Economic evidence for the control of meatborne parasites in Europe: A scoping review

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Control Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110659
N. Dadios , P.H. Imazaki , C. Millins , L.F. Thomas
{"title":"Economic evidence for the control of meatborne parasites in Europe: A scoping review","authors":"N. Dadios ,&nbsp;P.H. Imazaki ,&nbsp;C. Millins ,&nbsp;L.F. Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Meatborne parasites pose significant public health concerns and lead to substantial economic losses. Decisions regarding the introduction of risk-based control strategies to manage these parasites depend on the availability of robust and comparable economic data. To understand the current economic evidence available on meatborne parasite control, a scoping study was conducted to provide recommendations on optimal investment. This study is a part of the COST Action CA18105 (Risk-based Meat Inspection and Integrated Meat Safety Assurance [RIBMINS]), which supports the development and implementation of risk-based meat inspection programs across the EU and partner countries. This study synthesized available evidence published between January 1, 1980, and April 1, 2022, on interventions for controlling four meatborne parasites (<em>Taenia saginata</em>, <em>Taenia solium, T. gondii,</em> and <em>Trichinella spiralis</em>) where economic analyses had been conducted in COST Action CA18105-affiliated countries. We considered interventions conducted at any node within meat value chains, including those undertaken by health systems targeting consumers. Twelve relevant articles related to eleven distinct studies were identified. The outcomes of economic analyses were recorded, and a critical appraisal of these studies was carried out. The economic data identified have been summarized narratively, and this scoping review has revealed a scarcity of economic data on which to base decisions regarding meatborne parasite control and a lack of standardization in the approaches used for economic analysis. We recommend consensus building among researchers working in the food safety assurance space to standardize the methods and reporting of economic analysis of interventions, similar to efforts that have been made in the health economics space.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":319,"journal":{"name":"Food Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524003761/pdfft?md5=5504873c1238f769b15518133e6e1990&pid=1-s2.0-S0956713524003761-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Control","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524003761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meatborne parasites pose significant public health concerns and lead to substantial economic losses. Decisions regarding the introduction of risk-based control strategies to manage these parasites depend on the availability of robust and comparable economic data. To understand the current economic evidence available on meatborne parasite control, a scoping study was conducted to provide recommendations on optimal investment. This study is a part of the COST Action CA18105 (Risk-based Meat Inspection and Integrated Meat Safety Assurance [RIBMINS]), which supports the development and implementation of risk-based meat inspection programs across the EU and partner countries. This study synthesized available evidence published between January 1, 1980, and April 1, 2022, on interventions for controlling four meatborne parasites (Taenia saginata, Taenia solium, T. gondii, and Trichinella spiralis) where economic analyses had been conducted in COST Action CA18105-affiliated countries. We considered interventions conducted at any node within meat value chains, including those undertaken by health systems targeting consumers. Twelve relevant articles related to eleven distinct studies were identified. The outcomes of economic analyses were recorded, and a critical appraisal of these studies was carried out. The economic data identified have been summarized narratively, and this scoping review has revealed a scarcity of economic data on which to base decisions regarding meatborne parasite control and a lack of standardization in the approaches used for economic analysis. We recommend consensus building among researchers working in the food safety assurance space to standardize the methods and reporting of economic analysis of interventions, similar to efforts that have been made in the health economics space.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲肉类寄生虫控制的经济证据:范围审查
肉源性寄生虫对公众健康造成了严重的影响,并导致了巨大的经济损失。是否采用基于风险的控制策略来管理这些寄生虫,取决于是否有可靠的、可比较的经济数据。为了了解目前有关肉载寄生虫控制的经济证据,我们开展了一项范围界定研究,以提供有关最佳投资的建议。这项研究是 COST 行动 CA18105(基于风险的肉类检查和肉类安全综合保障 [RIBMINS])的一部分,该行动支持在欧盟及其伙伴国家制定和实施基于风险的肉类检查计划。本研究综合了1980年1月1日至2022年4月1日期间发表的关于控制四种肉传播寄生虫(矢状洮蛲虫、梭状洮蛲虫、淋球菌和螺旋体旋毛虫)的干预措施的现有证据,其中COST行动CA18105的附属国家进行了经济分析。我们考虑了在肉类价值链的任何节点进行的干预,包括卫生系统针对消费者进行的干预。确定了 11 项不同研究的 12 篇相关文章。我们记录了经济分析的结果,并对这些研究进行了批判性评估。我们对已确定的经济数据进行了叙述性总结,此次范围界定审查显示,可作为肉载寄生虫控制决策依据的经济数据非常稀缺,而且经济分析所用方法缺乏标准化。我们建议在食品安全保障领域开展工作的研究人员之间达成共识,使干预措施经济分析的方法和报告标准化,类似于在卫生经济学领域所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Control
Food Control 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Food Control is an international journal that provides essential information for those involved in food safety and process control. Food Control covers the below areas that relate to food process control or to food safety of human foods: • Microbial food safety and antimicrobial systems • Mycotoxins • Hazard analysis, HACCP and food safety objectives • Risk assessment, including microbial and chemical hazards • Quality assurance • Good manufacturing practices • Food process systems design and control • Food Packaging technology and materials in contact with foods • Rapid methods of analysis and detection, including sensor technology • Codes of practice, legislation and international harmonization • Consumer issues • Education, training and research needs. The scope of Food Control is comprehensive and includes original research papers, authoritative reviews, short communications, comment articles that report on new developments in food control, and position papers.
期刊最新文献
Volatile compound analysis in mezcal based on multiple extraction/concentration methods, deconvolution software, and multivariate analysis Isolation and characterization of a novel phage ST BD for the biological control of Salmonella in dairy food matrices Spillover effects of an information intervention on food handling behavior and the stimulus of survey in rural China Preparation and characterization of β-glucan/polyvinyl alcohol/clove essential oil film and its application in the preservation of fresh broad bean pods Antimicrobial pullulan packaging materials embedded with starch/thymol nanoemulsion via dynamic high-pressure micro-fluidization for strawberry preservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1