{"title":"Pressure space: The key subsurface commodity for CCS","authors":"Alexander P. Bump, Susan D. Hovorka","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Storage resource estimates are part of the foundation for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) policy, project development and pipeline routing. Multiple generations of such estimates have found that hundreds and even thousands of gigatons of storage are available in basins around the world. However, these estimates have largely been based on basin-scale static capacity calculations that assume pore space is accessible to CO<sub>2</sub>, because basins have open boundaries that allow water to be displaced and avoid pressure build-up. However, as we now consider large-scale injection that stresses the system capacity, limitations to the flow of CO<sub>2</sub> and displaced brine must be considered. These limits include pressure interactions among multiple projects, physical lateral discontinuities such as faults and facies changes, overpressure, juxtaposition with impermeable basement, and regulatory requirements that require protection of freshwater. We present here a simple algorithm to estimate the total pressure-limited storage resource. Applying it to the example of the Texas coastal Miocene results in a significantly lower storage resource over our previous static capacity estimates (assuming no water production). Based on this assessment, we find that CCS is still unlikely to be capacity-limited, but effective regulation, land valuation and project development will require recalibration and consideration of all projects in pressure communication. We conclude that depth-dependent and geomechanically-limited pressure space, not pore space, is the key subsurface commodity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 104174"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Storage resource estimates are part of the foundation for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) policy, project development and pipeline routing. Multiple generations of such estimates have found that hundreds and even thousands of gigatons of storage are available in basins around the world. However, these estimates have largely been based on basin-scale static capacity calculations that assume pore space is accessible to CO2, because basins have open boundaries that allow water to be displaced and avoid pressure build-up. However, as we now consider large-scale injection that stresses the system capacity, limitations to the flow of CO2 and displaced brine must be considered. These limits include pressure interactions among multiple projects, physical lateral discontinuities such as faults and facies changes, overpressure, juxtaposition with impermeable basement, and regulatory requirements that require protection of freshwater. We present here a simple algorithm to estimate the total pressure-limited storage resource. Applying it to the example of the Texas coastal Miocene results in a significantly lower storage resource over our previous static capacity estimates (assuming no water production). Based on this assessment, we find that CCS is still unlikely to be capacity-limited, but effective regulation, land valuation and project development will require recalibration and consideration of all projects in pressure communication. We conclude that depth-dependent and geomechanically-limited pressure space, not pore space, is the key subsurface commodity.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.