Improved Estimates of Sub-Regional Groundwater Storage Anomaly Using Coordinated Forward Modeling

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water Resources Research Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1029/2023wr036105
Yalin Ma, Yun Pan, Chong Zhang, Pat J.-F. Yeh, Li Xu, Zhiyong Huang, Huili Gong
{"title":"Improved Estimates of Sub-Regional Groundwater Storage Anomaly Using Coordinated Forward Modeling","authors":"Yalin Ma, Yun Pan, Chong Zhang, Pat J.-F. Yeh, Li Xu, Zhiyong Huang, Huili Gong","doi":"10.1029/2023wr036105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Groundwater storage anomaly (GWSA) can be estimated either at the large scale from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) or at the local scale based on in situ observed groundwater level (GWL) and aquifer storage parameters. Yet, the accuracy of GRACE-based estimate is affected by leakage errors, while that of local GWL-based estimate requires the reliable specific yield (Sy) data that are usually not available. Here, we developed a novel approach, the coordinated forward modeling (CoFM), based on the iterative forward modeling to improve GWSA estimation at the sub-regional scale smaller than the typical GRACE footprint. It is achieved by solving Sy through iterative comparisons between GRACE-based and observation-based GWSA at 0.5° grid scale, and then re-calculating GWSA using the updated Sy and observed GWL. The utility of CoFM is explored by using the hypothetical experiments and a real case study in the Piedmont Plain (PP, ∼54,000 km<sup>2</sup>) and East-central Plain (ECP, ∼86,000 km<sup>2</sup>) of North China Plain. Results show that CoFM can detect GWSA at 0.5° grid scale in the hypothetical experiments given the large spatial variability of GWL. While in the real case study, the CoFM distinguishes between the divergent unconfined GWSA trends (2005–2016) in PP (−41.80 ± 0.55 mm/yr) and ECP (−7.57 ± 0.60 mm/yr) caused by the differences in hydrogeological conditions and groundwater use. The improvement made by CoFM can be attributed to the use of the distributed GWL information to constrain GRACE leakage errors. This study highlights a practical important solution for improving sub-regional GWSA estimation through the joint use of large-scale GRACE data and local-scale well observations.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater storage anomaly (GWSA) can be estimated either at the large scale from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) or at the local scale based on in situ observed groundwater level (GWL) and aquifer storage parameters. Yet, the accuracy of GRACE-based estimate is affected by leakage errors, while that of local GWL-based estimate requires the reliable specific yield (Sy) data that are usually not available. Here, we developed a novel approach, the coordinated forward modeling (CoFM), based on the iterative forward modeling to improve GWSA estimation at the sub-regional scale smaller than the typical GRACE footprint. It is achieved by solving Sy through iterative comparisons between GRACE-based and observation-based GWSA at 0.5° grid scale, and then re-calculating GWSA using the updated Sy and observed GWL. The utility of CoFM is explored by using the hypothetical experiments and a real case study in the Piedmont Plain (PP, ∼54,000 km2) and East-central Plain (ECP, ∼86,000 km2) of North China Plain. Results show that CoFM can detect GWSA at 0.5° grid scale in the hypothetical experiments given the large spatial variability of GWL. While in the real case study, the CoFM distinguishes between the divergent unconfined GWSA trends (2005–2016) in PP (−41.80 ± 0.55 mm/yr) and ECP (−7.57 ± 0.60 mm/yr) caused by the differences in hydrogeological conditions and groundwater use. The improvement made by CoFM can be attributed to the use of the distributed GWL information to constrain GRACE leakage errors. This study highlights a practical important solution for improving sub-regional GWSA estimation through the joint use of large-scale GRACE data and local-scale well observations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用协调前向建模改进对次区域地下水存储异常的估算
地下水储量异常(GWSA)既可以通过重力恢复与气候实验(GRACE)进行大尺度估算,也可以根据现场观测的地下水位(GWL)和含水层储量参数进行局部估算。然而,基于全球重力恢复与气候实验(GRACE)的估算精度会受到渗漏误差的影响,而基于当地 GWL 的估算精度则需要可靠的特定产量(Sy)数据,但这些数据通常无法获得。在此,我们在迭代前向建模的基础上开发了一种新方法--协调前向建模(CoFM),以改进小于典型 GRACE 尺度的次区域尺度的 GWSA 估计。其方法是通过迭代比较基于 GRACE 的 GWSA 和基于观测的 0.5°网格尺度的 GWSA 来求解 Sy,然后使用更新的 Sy 和观测的 GWL 重新计算 GWSA。通过在华北平原的皮德蒙特平原(PP,∼54,000 平方公里)和中东部平原(ECP,∼86,000 平方公里)进行假设实验和实际案例研究,探讨了 CoFM 的实用性。结果表明,在假设实验中,由于 GWL 的空间变率较大,CoFM 可以在 0.5°网格尺度上探测到 GWSA。而在实际案例研究中,由于水文地质条件和地下水利用的不同,CoFM 能够区分 PP(-41.80 ± 0.55 mm/yr)和 ECP(-7.57 ± 0.60 mm/yr)地区不同的无约束 GWSA 趋势(2005-2016 年)。CoFM 的改进可归因于使用分布式 GWL 信息来限制 GRACE 的渗漏误差。本研究强调了通过联合使用大尺度 GRACE 数据和地方尺度水井观测来改进次区域 GWSA 估算的一个实用的重要解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
期刊最新文献
Scale-Dependent Inter-Catchment Groundwater Flow in Forested Catchments: Analysis of Multi-Catchment Water Balance Observations in Japan Exploring the Mechanisms of the Soil Moisture-Air Temperature Hypersensitive Coupling Regime Improved Estimates of Sub-Regional Groundwater Storage Anomaly Using Coordinated Forward Modeling Mechanisms of Suprapermafrost Groundwater Recharge Streamflow in Alpine Permafrost Regions: Insights From Young Water Fraction Analysis Hydraulic Properties Within the Complete Moisture Range of Hydric Soil on the Tibetan Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1