Comparison of Combined Virtual Reality Combined With Standing Balance Training Versus Standard Practice in Patients With Hemiplegia: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.
{"title":"Comparison of Combined Virtual Reality Combined With Standing Balance Training Versus Standard Practice in Patients With Hemiplegia: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yan Xu, Jiajia Yao, Jiadong Ni, Yajing Yang, Lianhui Fu, Cong Xu","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to determine whether virtual reality-based dynamic standing balance training improves three elements of sensory integration and investigate whether virtual reality-based dynamic standing balance training results in improved outcomes, especially regarding balance and gait, compared with the standard training method.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial involved 30 patients with hemiplegia. The experimental ( n = 15) and control ( n = 15) groups received virtual reality augmented-standing balance training or standard standing balance training, respectively, for 20 mins, 5 days a week, for 3 wks. The patients were assessed for primary (Sensory Organization Test and the Berg Balance Scale) and secondary (the functional reaching test and timed up-and-go test) outcomes before and after training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From preintervention to postintervention, the Berg Balance Scale score (F = 26.295, P < 0.05), timed up-and-go test score (F = 18.12, P < 0.05), mean score of conditions 2 (F = 4.36, P < 0.05) and 6 (F = 5.61, P < 0.05), and composite score of the Sensory Organization Test (F = 5.385, P < 0.05) in both groups were significantly improved. However, there was no significant difference between experimental group and control group (time*group P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Virtual reality combined with standing balance training improved sensory integration, postural control, balance, and gait ability in patients with hemiplegia, reducing fall risk. However, outcomes were comparable with general balance training regarding balance and gait.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"312-317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study is to determine whether virtual reality-based dynamic standing balance training improves three elements of sensory integration and investigate whether virtual reality-based dynamic standing balance training results in improved outcomes, especially regarding balance and gait, compared with the standard training method.
Design: This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial involved 30 patients with hemiplegia. The experimental ( n = 15) and control ( n = 15) groups received virtual reality augmented-standing balance training or standard standing balance training, respectively, for 20 mins, 5 days a week, for 3 wks. The patients were assessed for primary (Sensory Organization Test and the Berg Balance Scale) and secondary (the functional reaching test and timed up-and-go test) outcomes before and after training.
Results: From preintervention to postintervention, the Berg Balance Scale score (F = 26.295, P < 0.05), timed up-and-go test score (F = 18.12, P < 0.05), mean score of conditions 2 (F = 4.36, P < 0.05) and 6 (F = 5.61, P < 0.05), and composite score of the Sensory Organization Test (F = 5.385, P < 0.05) in both groups were significantly improved. However, there was no significant difference between experimental group and control group (time*group P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Virtual reality combined with standing balance training improved sensory integration, postural control, balance, and gait ability in patients with hemiplegia, reducing fall risk. However, outcomes were comparable with general balance training regarding balance and gait.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).