Comparison of Combined Virtual Reality Combined With Standing Balance Training Versus Standard Practice in Patients With Hemiplegia: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002590
Yan Xu, Jiajia Yao, Jiadong Ni, Yajing Yang, Lianhui Fu, Cong Xu
{"title":"Comparison of Combined Virtual Reality Combined With Standing Balance Training Versus Standard Practice in Patients With Hemiplegia: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yan Xu, Jiajia Yao, Jiadong Ni, Yajing Yang, Lianhui Fu, Cong Xu","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to determine whether virtual reality-based dynamic standing balance training improves three elements of sensory integration and investigate whether virtual reality-based dynamic standing balance training results in improved outcomes, especially regarding balance and gait, compared with the standard training method.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial involved 30 patients with hemiplegia. The experimental ( n = 15) and control ( n = 15) groups received virtual reality augmented-standing balance training or standard standing balance training, respectively, for 20 mins, 5 days a week, for 3 wks. The patients were assessed for primary (Sensory Organization Test and the Berg Balance Scale) and secondary (the functional reaching test and timed up-and-go test) outcomes before and after training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From preintervention to postintervention, the Berg Balance Scale score (F = 26.295, P < 0.05), timed up-and-go test score (F = 18.12, P < 0.05), mean score of conditions 2 (F = 4.36, P < 0.05) and 6 (F = 5.61, P < 0.05), and composite score of the Sensory Organization Test (F = 5.385, P < 0.05) in both groups were significantly improved. However, there was no significant difference between experimental group and control group (time*group P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Virtual reality combined with standing balance training improved sensory integration, postural control, balance, and gait ability in patients with hemiplegia, reducing fall risk. However, outcomes were comparable with general balance training regarding balance and gait.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"312-317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to determine whether virtual reality-based dynamic standing balance training improves three elements of sensory integration and investigate whether virtual reality-based dynamic standing balance training results in improved outcomes, especially regarding balance and gait, compared with the standard training method.

Design: This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial involved 30 patients with hemiplegia. The experimental ( n = 15) and control ( n = 15) groups received virtual reality augmented-standing balance training or standard standing balance training, respectively, for 20 mins, 5 days a week, for 3 wks. The patients were assessed for primary (Sensory Organization Test and the Berg Balance Scale) and secondary (the functional reaching test and timed up-and-go test) outcomes before and after training.

Results: From preintervention to postintervention, the Berg Balance Scale score (F = 26.295, P < 0.05), timed up-and-go test score (F = 18.12, P < 0.05), mean score of conditions 2 (F = 4.36, P < 0.05) and 6 (F = 5.61, P < 0.05), and composite score of the Sensory Organization Test (F = 5.385, P < 0.05) in both groups were significantly improved. However, there was no significant difference between experimental group and control group (time*group P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Virtual reality combined with standing balance training improved sensory integration, postural control, balance, and gait ability in patients with hemiplegia, reducing fall risk. However, outcomes were comparable with general balance training regarding balance and gait.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对偏瘫患者进行虚拟现实结合站立平衡训练与标准训练的比较:单盲随机对照试验。
目的确定基于虚拟现实(VR)的动态站立平衡训练是否能改善感觉统合的三个要素,并研究与标准训练方法相比,基于虚拟现实的动态站立平衡训练是否能改善疗效,尤其是在平衡和步态方面:这项单盲、随机对照试验涉及 30 名偏瘫患者。实验组(EG,n = 15)和对照组(CG,n = 15)分别接受 VR 增强站立平衡训练或标准站立平衡训练,每周 5 天,每次 20 分钟,为期 3 周。在训练前和训练后,对患者进行主要(感觉组织测试[SOT]和伯格平衡量表[BBS])和次要(功能性伸手测试和定时起立行走测试[TUG])结果评估:从干预前到干预后,两组的 BBS 得分(F = 26.295,P < 0.05)、TUG 得分(F = 18.12,P < 0.05)、条件 2 平均得分(F = 4.36,P < 0.05)和条件 6 平均得分(F = 5.61,P < 0.05)以及 SOT 综合得分(F = 5.385,P < 0.05)均有明显改善。结论:VR 结合站立平衡训练改善了患者的感觉能力:结论:虚拟现实结合站立平衡训练改善了偏瘫患者的感觉统合、姿势控制、平衡和步态能力,降低了跌倒风险。然而,在平衡和步态方面,其结果与普通平衡训练相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Supplementary Motor Area on Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-analysis. Comparing Prefabricated and 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses for the Management of Flat Foot Condition: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparison of Combined Virtual Reality Combined With Standing Balance Training Versus Standard Practice in Patients With Hemiplegia: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Axillary Nerve Improves Chronic Shoulder Pain and Dysfunction After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report. Comparative Study Between Aquatic Therapy and Land-Based Exercises in Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1