Perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on residency training in American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia programs in North America: a quantitative survey

IF 1.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.007
{"title":"Perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on residency training in American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia programs in North America: a quantitative survey","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To characterize the extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on aspects of the anesthesia residency experience from the perspective of American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia (ACVAA) mentors and trainees. This includes the residency interview process, didactic training and availability and variety of clinical cases for resident learning.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Cross-sectional, online, anonymous voluntary survey.</p></div><div><h3>Sample population</h3><p>A total of 58 respondents, representing 30 residency program mentors and 28 residents.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Surveys were distributed by email to 94 residency program mentors and 70 residents, representing programs and residents registered with the ACVAA during the years of 2019–2021. Anonymous links to an online survey were provided via a link embedded in the email. Questions included perceived impacts (–5 to +5 scale) on didactic and clinical training, case distribution, workload, residency application and selection process, and mental health<span>. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics [median (IQR) or mean ± SD].</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall survey response rate was 31.9% (30/94) and 40.0% (28/70) for resident program mentors and residents, respectively. There was a negative perceived impact on overall residency training reported: –1.0 (IQR –2.0 to 0) for program mentors and –1.5 ± 1.5 for residents. The reported perceived impact of travel limitations on case log completion was –2.0 (IQR –4.0 to –1.0) for program mentors and –2.4 ± 2.0 for residents. Program mentors and residents had incongruent feelings on the impact of the pandemic on work hours, with residents reporting a perceived increase in work hours [+2.1 ± 2.1 <em>versus</em> 0 (IQR –1.0 to 0)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Residency program mentors and residents generally agreed that the COVID-19 pandemic had negatively impacted multiple aspects of residency interview and training process. A broader, objective analysis of veterinary anesthesia training programs is required to fully elucidate the scale of the impact on veterinary anesthesia training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724001181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on aspects of the anesthesia residency experience from the perspective of American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia (ACVAA) mentors and trainees. This includes the residency interview process, didactic training and availability and variety of clinical cases for resident learning.

Study design

Cross-sectional, online, anonymous voluntary survey.

Sample population

A total of 58 respondents, representing 30 residency program mentors and 28 residents.

Methods

Surveys were distributed by email to 94 residency program mentors and 70 residents, representing programs and residents registered with the ACVAA during the years of 2019–2021. Anonymous links to an online survey were provided via a link embedded in the email. Questions included perceived impacts (–5 to +5 scale) on didactic and clinical training, case distribution, workload, residency application and selection process, and mental health. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics [median (IQR) or mean ± SD].

Results

The overall survey response rate was 31.9% (30/94) and 40.0% (28/70) for resident program mentors and residents, respectively. There was a negative perceived impact on overall residency training reported: –1.0 (IQR –2.0 to 0) for program mentors and –1.5 ± 1.5 for residents. The reported perceived impact of travel limitations on case log completion was –2.0 (IQR –4.0 to –1.0) for program mentors and –2.4 ± 2.0 for residents. Program mentors and residents had incongruent feelings on the impact of the pandemic on work hours, with residents reporting a perceived increase in work hours [+2.1 ± 2.1 versus 0 (IQR –1.0 to 0)].

Conclusions

Residency program mentors and residents generally agreed that the COVID-19 pandemic had negatively impacted multiple aspects of residency interview and training process. A broader, objective analysis of veterinary anesthesia training programs is required to fully elucidate the scale of the impact on veterinary anesthesia training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行对北美美国兽医麻醉与镇痛学院住院医师培训的影响:一项定量调查。
目的:从美国兽医麻醉与镇痛学院(American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia, ACVAA)导师和受训者的角度,描述 COVID-19 大流行对麻醉住院医师实习经历各方面的影响程度。研究设计:研究设计:横断面、在线、匿名自愿调查:共有 58 名受访者,分别代表 30 名住院医师培训项目导师和 28 名住院医师:通过电子邮件向 94 名住院医师培训项目导师和 70 名住院医师发放了调查问卷,他们代表了 2019-2021 年期间在 ACVAA 注册的项目和住院医师。电子邮件中嵌入了在线调查的匿名链接。问题包括对教学和临床培训、病例分配、工作量、住院医师申请和遴选过程以及心理健康的影响(-5 到 +5)。调查结果以描述性统计[中位数(IQR)或平均值±标准差]进行总结:住院医师项目导师和住院医师的总体调查回复率分别为 31.9%(30/94)和 40.0%(28/70)。据报告,住院医师培训总体上受到了负面影响:项目导师为-1.0(IQR -2.0至0),住院医师为-1.5 ± 1.5。据报告,项目导师认为旅行限制对病例记录完成的影响为-2.0(IQR -4.0至-1.0),住院医师为-2.4 ± 2.0。在大流行病对工作时间的影响方面,项目导师和住院医师的感受不一致,住院医师认为工作时间增加了[+2.1 ± 2.1 对 0 (IQR -1.0 to 0)]:住院医师项目导师和住院医师普遍认为,COVID-19大流行对住院医师面试和培训过程的多个方面产生了负面影响。需要对兽医麻醉培训项目进行更广泛、更客观的分析,以充分阐明对兽医麻醉培训的影响程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome: the basic sciences; pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management equipment intensive care chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals welfare issues associated with pain and distress education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.
期刊最新文献
Opioid-free management of postoperative sternotomy-related pain by continuous transversus thoracis plane block in a dog. Rectus sheath block for perioperative analgesia during umbilical herniorrhaphy in a calf. Comparative study between lateral versus latero-ventral quadratus lumborum block for perioperative analgesia in canine laparoscopic ovariectomy. Peripheral warming for prevention of hypothermia in small dogs during soft tissue surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Pharmacokinetics of methadone after intravenous and subcutaneous administration in domestic ferrets (Mustela putorius furo).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1