A simplified vine copula-based probabilistic method for quantifying multi-dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap: take a three-dimensional case as an example

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Ecological Statistics Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s10651-024-00622-w
Qi Zhou, Shaoqian Huang
{"title":"A simplified vine copula-based probabilistic method for quantifying multi-dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap: take a three-dimensional case as an example","authors":"Qi Zhou, Shaoqian Huang","doi":"10.1007/s10651-024-00622-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For quantifying <i>m</i>-dimensional (<span>\\(m \\ge 3\\)</span>) niche regions and niche overlaps using a copula-based approach, commonly used copulas, including Archimedean and elliptical copula families, are unsatisfactory alternatives in characterizing a complex dependence structure among multiple variables, especially when bi-variate copulas characterizing dependency structures of two-dimensional sub-variables differ. To solve the problem, we improve the copula-based niche space modeling approach using simplified vine copulas, a powerful tool containing various bi-variate dependence structures in one multivariate copula. Using four simulated data sets, we then check the performance of simplified vine copula approximation when the simplifying assumption is invalid. Finally, we apply the improved copula-based approach to quantifying a three-dimensional niche space of a real case of Swanson et al. (Ecology 96(2):318–324, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0235.1) and discover that among various simplified vine and other flexible multi-dimensional copulas, non-parametric simplified vine copula approximation performs best in fitting the data set. In the discussion, to analyze differences in calculating niche overlaps caused by using different copulas, we compare non-parametric simplified vine copula approximation with non-parametric and parametric simplified vine copula approximation, elliptical copula, Hierarchical Archimedean copula estimation, and empirical beta copula and give some comments on the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50519,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00622-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For quantifying m-dimensional (\(m \ge 3\)) niche regions and niche overlaps using a copula-based approach, commonly used copulas, including Archimedean and elliptical copula families, are unsatisfactory alternatives in characterizing a complex dependence structure among multiple variables, especially when bi-variate copulas characterizing dependency structures of two-dimensional sub-variables differ. To solve the problem, we improve the copula-based niche space modeling approach using simplified vine copulas, a powerful tool containing various bi-variate dependence structures in one multivariate copula. Using four simulated data sets, we then check the performance of simplified vine copula approximation when the simplifying assumption is invalid. Finally, we apply the improved copula-based approach to quantifying a three-dimensional niche space of a real case of Swanson et al. (Ecology 96(2):318–324, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0235.1) and discover that among various simplified vine and other flexible multi-dimensional copulas, non-parametric simplified vine copula approximation performs best in fitting the data set. In the discussion, to analyze differences in calculating niche overlaps caused by using different copulas, we compare non-parametric simplified vine copula approximation with non-parametric and parametric simplified vine copula approximation, elliptical copula, Hierarchical Archimedean copula estimation, and empirical beta copula and give some comments on the results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化多维生态位和生态位重叠的基于藤本协约的简化概率方法:以三维案例为例
对于使用基于共轭的方法量化m维((m \ge 3\))利基区域和利基重叠,常用的共轭(包括阿基米德共轭和椭圆共轭族)在表征多个变量之间复杂的依赖结构时并不令人满意,特别是当表征二维子变量依赖结构的双变量共轭不同时。为了解决这个问题,我们使用简化的藤蔓共线方程改进了基于共线方程的利基空间建模方法,这是一种将各种双变量依赖结构包含在一个多变量共线方程中的强大工具。然后,我们利用四个模拟数据集,检验了简化假设无效时简化藤蔓共轭近似的性能。最后,我们将改进的基于 copula 的方法用于量化 Swanson 等人的一个真实案例的三维生态位空间(Ecology 96(2):318-324, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0235.1),发现在各种简化藤蔓和其他灵活的多维 copula 中,非参数简化藤蔓 copula 近似在拟合数据集方面表现最佳。在讨论中,为了分析使用不同共线方程计算生态位重叠的差异,我们将非参数简化藤蔓共线方程近似与非参数和参数简化藤蔓共线方程近似、椭圆共线方程、层次阿基米德共线方程估计和经验贝塔共线方程进行了比较,并对结果给出了一些评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
Environmental and Ecological Statistics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Ecological Statistics publishes papers on practical applications of statistics and related quantitative methods to environmental science addressing contemporary issues. Emphasis is on applied mathematical statistics, statistical methodology, and data interpretation and improvement for future use, with a view to advance statistics for environment, ecology and environmental health, and to advance environmental theory and practice using valid statistics. Besides clarity of exposition, a single most important criterion for publication is the appropriateness of the statistical method to the particular environmental problem. The Journal covers all aspects of the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of environmental data for research, policy and regulation. The Journal is cross-disciplinary within the context of contemporary environmental issues and the associated statistical tools, concepts and methods. The Journal broadly covers theory and methods, case studies and applications, environmental change and statistical ecology, environmental health statistics and stochastics, and related areas. Special features include invited discussion papers; research communications; technical notes and consultation corner; mini-reviews; letters to the Editor; news, views and announcements; hardware and software reviews; data management etc.
期刊最新文献
Identifying key drivers of extinction for Chitala populations: data-driven insights from an intraguild predation model using a Bayesian framework Health effects of noise and application of machine learning techniques as prediction tools in noise induced health issues: a systematic review Multivariate Bayesian models with flexible shared interactions for analyzing spatio-temporal patterns of rare cancers A novel hybrid approach based on outlier and error correction methods to predict river discharge using meteorological variables Bayesian design methods for improving the effectiveness of ecosystem monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1