{"title":"Feeders and Expellers, Two Types of Animalcules With Outboard Cilia, Have Distinct Surface Interactions","authors":"Praneet Prakash, Marco Vona, Raymond E. Goldstein","doi":"arxiv-2407.00439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within biological fluid dynamics, it is conventional to distinguish between\n\"puller\" and \"pusher\" microswimmers on the basis of the forward or aft location\nof the flagella relative to the cell body: typically, bacteria are pushers and\nalgae are pullers. Here we note that since many pullers have \"outboard\" cilia\nor flagella displaced laterally from the cell centerline on both sides of the\norganism, there are two important subclasses whose far-field is that of a\nstresslet, but whose near field is qualitatively more complex. The ciliary beat\ncreates not only a propulsive force but also swirling flows that can be\nrepresented by paired rotlets with two possible senses of rotation, either\n\"feeders\" that sweep fluid toward the cell apex, or \"expellers\" that push fluid\naway. Experimental studies of the rotifer $Brachionus~plicatilis$ in\ncombination with earlier work on the green algae $Chlamydomonas~reinhardtii$\nshow that the two classes have markedly different interactions with surfaces.\nWhen swimming near a surface, expellers such as $C.~reinhardtii$ scatter from\nthe wall, whereas a feeder like $B.~plicatilis$ stably attaches. This results\nin a stochastic \"run-and-stick\" locomotion, with periods of ballistic motion\nparallel to the surface interrupted by trapping at the surface.","PeriodicalId":501321,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.00439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Within biological fluid dynamics, it is conventional to distinguish between
"puller" and "pusher" microswimmers on the basis of the forward or aft location
of the flagella relative to the cell body: typically, bacteria are pushers and
algae are pullers. Here we note that since many pullers have "outboard" cilia
or flagella displaced laterally from the cell centerline on both sides of the
organism, there are two important subclasses whose far-field is that of a
stresslet, but whose near field is qualitatively more complex. The ciliary beat
creates not only a propulsive force but also swirling flows that can be
represented by paired rotlets with two possible senses of rotation, either
"feeders" that sweep fluid toward the cell apex, or "expellers" that push fluid
away. Experimental studies of the rotifer $Brachionus~plicatilis$ in
combination with earlier work on the green algae $Chlamydomonas~reinhardtii$
show that the two classes have markedly different interactions with surfaces.
When swimming near a surface, expellers such as $C.~reinhardtii$ scatter from
the wall, whereas a feeder like $B.~plicatilis$ stably attaches. This results
in a stochastic "run-and-stick" locomotion, with periods of ballistic motion
parallel to the surface interrupted by trapping at the surface.