Continuity in Leibniz and Deleuze: A reading of Difference and Repetition and The Fold

IF 1.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s11007-024-09636-4
Hamed Movahedi
{"title":"Continuity in Leibniz and Deleuze: A reading of Difference and Repetition and The Fold","authors":"Hamed Movahedi","doi":"10.1007/s11007-024-09636-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The status of continuity in Deleuze’s metaphysics is a subject of debate. Deleuze calls the virtual, in <i>Difference and Repetition</i>, an <i>Ideal continuum</i>, and the differential relations that constitute the Ideal imply the <i>continuity</i> of this field. But, Deleuze does not hesitate to formulate the same field by the affirmation of divergence (incompossibility) that can be regarded as a form of <i>discontinuity</i>. It is, hence, unclear how these two ostensibly contradictory accounts might reconcile. This article attempts to reconstitute a Deleuzian theory of continuity through Leibniz, whose philosophy is equally subject to a tension between the law of continuity, prevalent in his mathematics and metaphysics, and the discontinuity or absolute individuality of monads. By reorienting <i>The Fold</i> around the motif of continuity a new conceptual space is opened for continuity qua heterogeneity-<i>and</i>-inseparability. Then, enfolding the conceptual personae of <i>The Fold</i> onto <i>Difference and Repetition</i> reveals the tacit though decisive presence of different types of continuity operational in Deleuze’s metaphysics that will be called divergent, intensive, torsional, and tenorsional continuities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45310,"journal":{"name":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-024-09636-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The status of continuity in Deleuze’s metaphysics is a subject of debate. Deleuze calls the virtual, in Difference and Repetition, an Ideal continuum, and the differential relations that constitute the Ideal imply the continuity of this field. But, Deleuze does not hesitate to formulate the same field by the affirmation of divergence (incompossibility) that can be regarded as a form of discontinuity. It is, hence, unclear how these two ostensibly contradictory accounts might reconcile. This article attempts to reconstitute a Deleuzian theory of continuity through Leibniz, whose philosophy is equally subject to a tension between the law of continuity, prevalent in his mathematics and metaphysics, and the discontinuity or absolute individuality of monads. By reorienting The Fold around the motif of continuity a new conceptual space is opened for continuity qua heterogeneity-and-inseparability. Then, enfolding the conceptual personae of The Fold onto Difference and Repetition reveals the tacit though decisive presence of different types of continuity operational in Deleuze’s metaphysics that will be called divergent, intensive, torsional, and tenorsional continuities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莱布尼茨和德勒兹的连续性:差异与重复》和《折叠》的解读
连续性在德勒兹形而上学中的地位是一个争论不休的话题。德勒兹在《差异与重复》中将虚拟称为理想的连续体,而构成理想的差异关系意味着这一领域的连续性。但是,德勒兹毫不犹豫地通过肯定分歧(不可能性)来表述同一场域,这可以被视为一种非连续性。因此,我们并不清楚这两种表面上相互矛盾的说法如何调和。本文试图通过莱布尼茨重构德勒兹的连续性理论,莱布尼茨的哲学同样受制于其数学和形而上学中盛行的连续性法则与单子的非连续性或绝对个体性之间的紧张关系。通过围绕连续性这一主题对《折叠》进行重新定位,为连续性即异质性和不可分性打开了一个新的概念空间。然后,将《折叠》中的概念角色折叠到《差异与重复》中,就会发现德勒兹的形而上学中存在着不同类型的连续性,它们将被称为发散连续性、密集连续性、扭转连续性和腱式连续性,尽管它们是决定性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The central purpose of Continental Philosophy Review is to foster a living dialogue within the international community on philosophical issues of mutual interest. It seeks to elicit, discussions of fundamental philosophical problems and original approaches to them. Broadly encompassing in its focus, the journal invites essays on both expressly theoretical topics and topics dealing with practical problems that extend to the wider domain of socio-political life. It encourages explorations in the domains of art, morality, science and religion as they relate to specific philosophical concerns. Although not an advocate of any one trend or school in philosophy, the journal is especially committed to keeping abreast of developments within phenomenology and contemporary continental philosophy and is interested in investigations that probe possible points of intersection between the continental European and the Anglo-American traditions. Continental Philosophy Review contains review articles of recent, original works in philosophy. It provides considerable space for such reviews, allowing critics to develop their comments and assessments at some length.
期刊最新文献
Cassirer’s functionalist account of physical truth: object, measurement and technology Natural sciences, technology and foresight: an approach based on Ernst Cassirer’s symbol theory Mathematical sciences as symbolic form: the objects and objectivity of science in Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy of science and culture Gerontological difference: Tracing the ontological generativity of aging after Heidegger From care to solidarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1