Can interaction with generative artificial intelligence enhance learning autonomy? A longitudinal study from comparative perspectives of virtual companionship and knowledge acquisition preferences
{"title":"Can interaction with generative artificial intelligence enhance learning autonomy? A longitudinal study from comparative perspectives of virtual companionship and knowledge acquisition preferences","authors":"Zehang Xie, Xinzhu Wu, Yunxiang Xie","doi":"10.1111/jcal.13032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>With the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, generative AI has been widely used in the field of education and represents a groundbreaking shift in overcoming the constraints of time and space within educational activities. However, previous literature has not paid enough attention to AI-involved teaching patterns, and it is necessary to evaluate the effects of this learning pattern.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective<b>s</b></h3>\n \n <p>Based on the social presence theory and the community of inquiry model, the main purpose of this study is to evaluate whether and how interaction frequency with chatbots (IFC) affects people's learning autonomy (LA) under two preferences: knowledge acquisition and virtual companionship, and whether social presence (SP) plays a mediating role.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The 1-year longitudinal study was designed to be conducted from May 2022 to May 2023 and included three rounds of surveys of 1155 undergraduate students on their use of robots for learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>For learners preferring virtual companionship, no direct correlation was found between IFC and LA. However, SP acted as a mediating factor, enhancing LA through increased chatbot interactions. This suggests that while direct interactions may not directly influence LA, the resulting SP can foster it. Conversely, for learners favouring knowledge acquisition, higher IFC negatively impacted both SP and LA. Despite this, a strong sense of SP consistently correlated positively with LA, indicating it could offset some negative effects of frequent chatbot use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"40 5","pages":"2369-2384"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
With the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, generative AI has been widely used in the field of education and represents a groundbreaking shift in overcoming the constraints of time and space within educational activities. However, previous literature has not paid enough attention to AI-involved teaching patterns, and it is necessary to evaluate the effects of this learning pattern.
Objectives
Based on the social presence theory and the community of inquiry model, the main purpose of this study is to evaluate whether and how interaction frequency with chatbots (IFC) affects people's learning autonomy (LA) under two preferences: knowledge acquisition and virtual companionship, and whether social presence (SP) plays a mediating role.
Methods
The 1-year longitudinal study was designed to be conducted from May 2022 to May 2023 and included three rounds of surveys of 1155 undergraduate students on their use of robots for learning.
Results and Conclusions
For learners preferring virtual companionship, no direct correlation was found between IFC and LA. However, SP acted as a mediating factor, enhancing LA through increased chatbot interactions. This suggests that while direct interactions may not directly influence LA, the resulting SP can foster it. Conversely, for learners favouring knowledge acquisition, higher IFC negatively impacted both SP and LA. Despite this, a strong sense of SP consistently correlated positively with LA, indicating it could offset some negative effects of frequent chatbot use.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
