Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race

IF 0.7 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Latino Studies Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4
Natasha Howard
{"title":"Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race","authors":"Natasha Howard","doi":"10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often live in transnational contexts with transnational identities. This article engages with those scholars who call for moving beyond the Black/White binary by asking how their arguments stimulate anti-Black discourse. Ultimately, LatCrit writers fail to engage with Black Latinx critical race theorists in both the United States and Latin America and, as a result, reproduce anti-Blackness. The call to move beyond a Black/White binary is really a call to make Latinx Blackness invisible. As such, it is not a step toward racial justice but another articulation of anti-Blackness presented as progressive racial thinking. Here I engage with Black Latinx and Black Latin American critical race scholars who challenge US LatCrit scholars to think about how anti-Blackness is part of Latinidad.</p>","PeriodicalId":45728,"journal":{"name":"Latino Studies","volume":"189 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latino Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often live in transnational contexts with transnational identities. This article engages with those scholars who call for moving beyond the Black/White binary by asking how their arguments stimulate anti-Black discourse. Ultimately, LatCrit writers fail to engage with Black Latinx critical race theorists in both the United States and Latin America and, as a result, reproduce anti-Blackness. The call to move beyond a Black/White binary is really a call to make Latinx Blackness invisible. As such, it is not a step toward racial justice but another articulation of anti-Blackness presented as progressive racial thinking. Here I engage with Black Latinx and Black Latin American critical race scholars who challenge US LatCrit scholars to think about how anti-Blackness is part of Latinidad.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越二元论:反黑人种族言论如何出现在关于种族的批判性讨论中
二十多年来,拉美裔批评理论(LatCrit)学者一直呼吁在种族问题对话中超越黑白二元论。支持者认为,通过强调黑人,我们忽视了拉丁裔和其他种族少数群体,他们既不是黑人也不是白人,而且往往生活在跨国环境中,具有跨国身份。本文与那些呼吁超越黑白二元论的学者进行了探讨,询问他们的论点是如何激发反黑人话语的。最终,LatCrit 的作者未能与美国和拉丁美洲的拉美黑人批判种族理论家进行交流,因此,再现了反黑人现象。呼吁超越黑人/白人二元论实际上是呼吁让拉美黑人隐形。因此,这不是迈向种族正义的一步,而是以进步种族思想为表述的反黑人的另一种表述。在此,我与拉美黑人和拉美黑人批判种族学者一起,挑战美国 LatCrit 学者思考反黑人如何成为拉美人的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Latino Studies
Latino Studies SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Latino Studies has established itself as the leading, international peer-reviewed journal for advancing interdisciplinary scholarship about the lived experience and struggles of Latinas and Latinos for equality, representation, and social justice. Sustaining the tradition of activist scholarship of the founders of Chicana and Chicano Studies and Puerto Rican Studies, the journal critically engages the study of the local, national, transnational, and hemispheric realities that continue to influence the Latina and Latino presence in the United States. It is committed to developing a new transnational research agenda that bridges the academic and non-academic worlds and fosters mutual learning and collaboration among all the Latino national groups. Latino Studies provides an intellectual forum for innovative explorations and theorization. We welcome submissions of original research articles of up to 8,000 words, from scholars and practitioners in the national and international research communities. In addition to scholarly articles, we also invite other type of submissions. Vivencias or ''reports from the field'' are short personal essays between 2000-3000 words that describe and analyze significant local issues, struggles and debates affecting the lives of Latinas/os in different regions of the country. We also welcome interviews with Latinas/os who are contributing in their local communities or nationwide (e.g. authors, artists, community activists, union leaders, etc.). Our aim in publishing the ''reports'' is to inform readers about events that are sometimes over-looked by the national and regional media.The Reflexiones Pedagógicas section includes short essays between 2000-3000 words that address issues of pedagogy and curriculum. This section contributes toward the development and institutionalization of our field in the academy. Páginas Recuperadas are short essays between 2000-3000 words that seek to recover archival documents. These essays make visible, historically significant achievements by individuals, and pivotal events in the experience of Latinas/os in the United States. El Foro is an occasional section that provides a space for essays of approximately 6000 words, addressing current events, in an effort to further engage our readers in a dialogue on the pressing issues affecting Latina/o communities today.Book and media reviews are devoted to scholarship/media on the experience of Latinas/os in the United States. Reviews are no more than 1000 words.
期刊最新文献
“Th’oppressor’s wrong,” or, what’s Hamlet to the Borderlands? Sonic border raids: The racial acousmatic and contemporary Latinx opera So-called essential but treated as disposable: Northern California farmworkers working under COVID-19 Visualizing imperial encounters: PLACA and US-Central American solidarity murals in San Francisco’s Mission District Seeing the unseen: abjection, social death, and neoliberal implication in Héctor Tobar’s The Tattooed Soldier
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1