{"title":"Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race","authors":"Natasha Howard","doi":"10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often live in transnational contexts with transnational identities. This article engages with those scholars who call for moving beyond the Black/White binary by asking how their arguments stimulate anti-Black discourse. Ultimately, LatCrit writers fail to engage with Black Latinx critical race theorists in both the United States and Latin America and, as a result, reproduce anti-Blackness. The call to move beyond a Black/White binary is really a call to make Latinx Blackness invisible. As such, it is not a step toward racial justice but another articulation of anti-Blackness presented as progressive racial thinking. Here I engage with Black Latinx and Black Latin American critical race scholars who challenge US LatCrit scholars to think about how anti-Blackness is part of Latinidad.</p>","PeriodicalId":45728,"journal":{"name":"Latino Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latino Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often live in transnational contexts with transnational identities. This article engages with those scholars who call for moving beyond the Black/White binary by asking how their arguments stimulate anti-Black discourse. Ultimately, LatCrit writers fail to engage with Black Latinx critical race theorists in both the United States and Latin America and, as a result, reproduce anti-Blackness. The call to move beyond a Black/White binary is really a call to make Latinx Blackness invisible. As such, it is not a step toward racial justice but another articulation of anti-Blackness presented as progressive racial thinking. Here I engage with Black Latinx and Black Latin American critical race scholars who challenge US LatCrit scholars to think about how anti-Blackness is part of Latinidad.
期刊介绍:
Latino Studies has established itself as the leading, international peer-reviewed journal for advancing interdisciplinary scholarship about the lived experience and struggles of Latinas and Latinos for equality, representation, and social justice. Sustaining the tradition of activist scholarship of the founders of Chicana and Chicano Studies and Puerto Rican Studies, the journal critically engages the study of the local, national, transnational, and hemispheric realities that continue to influence the Latina and Latino presence in the United States. It is committed to developing a new transnational research agenda that bridges the academic and non-academic worlds and fosters mutual learning and collaboration among all the Latino national groups.
Latino Studies provides an intellectual forum for innovative explorations and theorization. We welcome submissions of original research articles of up to 8,000 words, from scholars and practitioners in the national and international research communities.
In addition to scholarly articles, we also invite other type of submissions. Vivencias or ''reports from the field'' are short personal essays between 2000-3000 words that describe and analyze significant local issues, struggles and debates affecting the lives of Latinas/os in different regions of the country. We also welcome interviews with Latinas/os who are contributing in their local communities or nationwide (e.g. authors, artists, community activists, union leaders, etc.). Our aim in publishing the ''reports'' is to inform readers about events that are sometimes over-looked by the national and regional media.The Reflexiones Pedagógicas section includes short essays between 2000-3000 words that address issues of pedagogy and curriculum. This section contributes toward the development and institutionalization of our field in the academy. Páginas Recuperadas are short essays between 2000-3000 words that seek to recover archival documents. These essays make visible, historically significant achievements by individuals, and pivotal events in the experience of Latinas/os in the United States. El Foro is an occasional section that provides a space for essays of approximately 6000 words, addressing current events, in an effort to further engage our readers in a dialogue on the pressing issues affecting Latina/o communities today.Book and media reviews are devoted to scholarship/media on the experience of Latinas/os in the United States. Reviews are no more than 1000 words.