{"title":"Predator odour recognition in Eurasian kestrels","authors":"José Carrillo-Hidalgo, Enrique González-Dávila","doi":"10.1007/s00049-024-00406-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Semiochemicals released by predators (i.e. “kairomones”) may be useful for prey species. Knowledge on functional use of olfaction to detect kairomones and the consequent antipredator behaviour remains scant in birds, especially in raptors. The study population of Eurasian kestrels <i>Falco tinnunculus canariensis</i> inhabits the island of Tenerife, and man is one of its main predators, destroying clutches and stealing nestlings. Man and kestrels have evolved in sympatry or, at least, have been sharing the habitat for a long time. Parent kestrels were exposed to chemical cues: human fresh urine (predator), cologne (odorous control), or water (odourless control) in the nest when provisioning for nestlings. They did not display clear signs of aggressive antipredator behaviour when in contact with kairomones released by a non-present human predator. With human urine, they visited less, arrived earlier the first time in the trial, but their refusal percentage dropped significantly, and they spent more time inside the nest than those containing cologne or water. Females, especially, visited those nests highest above the ground less times regardless of substance. Interactions among some environmental (e.g. nest height, variations in human urine odour) and behavioural factors (e.g. neophobic response) could influence kestrel behaviour regarding kairomones. Kestrels would exhibit commensurate responses according to the magnitude of predation risk faced. We suggest kestrels do not ultimately react through behavioural defence mechanisms based on chemical cues from human predators, although it remains unclear if they respond to these chemical cues in other ways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":515,"journal":{"name":"Chemoecology","volume":"34 3","pages":"115 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemoecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00049-024-00406-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Semiochemicals released by predators (i.e. “kairomones”) may be useful for prey species. Knowledge on functional use of olfaction to detect kairomones and the consequent antipredator behaviour remains scant in birds, especially in raptors. The study population of Eurasian kestrels Falco tinnunculus canariensis inhabits the island of Tenerife, and man is one of its main predators, destroying clutches and stealing nestlings. Man and kestrels have evolved in sympatry or, at least, have been sharing the habitat for a long time. Parent kestrels were exposed to chemical cues: human fresh urine (predator), cologne (odorous control), or water (odourless control) in the nest when provisioning for nestlings. They did not display clear signs of aggressive antipredator behaviour when in contact with kairomones released by a non-present human predator. With human urine, they visited less, arrived earlier the first time in the trial, but their refusal percentage dropped significantly, and they spent more time inside the nest than those containing cologne or water. Females, especially, visited those nests highest above the ground less times regardless of substance. Interactions among some environmental (e.g. nest height, variations in human urine odour) and behavioural factors (e.g. neophobic response) could influence kestrel behaviour regarding kairomones. Kestrels would exhibit commensurate responses according to the magnitude of predation risk faced. We suggest kestrels do not ultimately react through behavioural defence mechanisms based on chemical cues from human predators, although it remains unclear if they respond to these chemical cues in other ways.
期刊介绍:
It is the aim of Chemoecology to promote and stimulate basic science in the field of chemical ecology by publishing research papers that integrate evolution and/or ecology and chemistry in an attempt to increase our understanding of the biological significance of natural products. Its scopes cover the evolutionary biology, mechanisms and chemistry of biotic interactions and the evolution and synthesis of the underlying natural products. Manuscripts on the evolution and ecology of trophic relationships, intra- and interspecific communication, competition, and other kinds of chemical communication in all types of organismic interactions will be considered suitable for publication. Ecological studies of trophic interactions will be considered also if they are based on the information of the transmission of natural products (e.g. fatty acids) through the food-chain. Chemoecology further publishes papers that relate to the evolution and ecology of interactions mediated by non-volatile compounds (e.g. adhesive secretions). Mechanistic approaches may include the identification, biosynthesis and metabolism of substances that carry information and the elucidation of receptor- and transduction systems using physiological, biochemical and molecular techniques. Papers describing the structure and functional morphology of organs involved in chemical communication will also be considered.