Investigating predictors of protein intake in an adult population utilising the National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES) Survey in the United States

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Proceedings of the Nutrition Society Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1017/s0029665124004518
E. O’Bree, I. Soyiri, A. Johnstone
{"title":"Investigating predictors of protein intake in an adult population utilising the National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES) Survey in the United States","authors":"E. O’Bree, I. Soyiri, A. Johnstone","doi":"10.1017/s0029665124004518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely accepted that meeting recommended protein intake is protective of muscle mass<jats:sup>(1)</jats:sup>. Insufficient intake is related to accelerated sarcopenia and impaired physical function, contributing to increased mortality and morbidity. The recommended target set by the American dietary guidelines is 0.8 g of protein per kg of body weight, based on data collated by the National Academies published in 2005<jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup>. Currently approximately 50% of women and 30% of men do not meet these targets<jats:sup>(3)</jats:sup>. It is of public interest to analyse current patterns of intake to allow for improved strategy through awareness of factors that impact protein intake.To investigate the factors which determine an individual’s protein intake and how they can be used to predict daily intake.A secondary data analysis of longitudinal data collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and 2020 has been carried out<jats:sup>(4)</jats:sup>. Data was accessed from the public domain on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website. The study protocol received approval from the research ethics review board of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) of the CDC. Average protein intake has been calculated and participant demographics reported. STATA software has been used to carry out a bivariate regression of factors associated with protein intake, an adjusted multivariate regression analysis and a parsimonious model.19601 participants (52.4% women) aged 20 and over had valid protein data. Adjusted regression analysis generated three model fits, with the parsimonious model excluding BMI categories and household income had a statistically insignificant impact on protein intake. Men consumed 23.99g more protein per day compared to women (p&lt;0.001: 95% CI 23.09 to 24.89). Individuals over 65 consumed 13.92g less protein per day compared to those aged 20-35 years old (p&lt;0.001: 95% CI − 15.25 to −12.59). Mexican American individuals consumed 7.47g more protein than Non-Hispanic White individuals (p&lt;0.001: 95% CI 5.89 to 9.04) and Non-Hispanic White individuals consumed 2.95g more protein compared to non-Hispanic Black individuals (p&lt;0.001: 95% CI 4.13 to 1.77). Those with the lowest educational attainment consumed 10.77g less protein compared to individuals with a college degree (p&lt;0.001: 95% CI −12.79 to −8.74). From 2011 to 2020, there was a gradual decline in protein intake which is statistically significant when comparing 2011/12 with 2015/16 and 2017/2020.Protein intake can be predicted by an individual’s gender, age, ethnicity, level of education attainment and time period. This study informs policymakers that individuals aged 65 and above are at risk of insufficient protein intake and there has been a general decrease in protein consumption over time. This provides evidence to support initiatives focused on this age category to maximise change and reduce rates of sarcopenia.","PeriodicalId":20751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665124004518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely accepted that meeting recommended protein intake is protective of muscle mass(1). Insufficient intake is related to accelerated sarcopenia and impaired physical function, contributing to increased mortality and morbidity. The recommended target set by the American dietary guidelines is 0.8 g of protein per kg of body weight, based on data collated by the National Academies published in 2005(2). Currently approximately 50% of women and 30% of men do not meet these targets(3). It is of public interest to analyse current patterns of intake to allow for improved strategy through awareness of factors that impact protein intake.To investigate the factors which determine an individual’s protein intake and how they can be used to predict daily intake.A secondary data analysis of longitudinal data collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and 2020 has been carried out(4). Data was accessed from the public domain on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website. The study protocol received approval from the research ethics review board of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) of the CDC. Average protein intake has been calculated and participant demographics reported. STATA software has been used to carry out a bivariate regression of factors associated with protein intake, an adjusted multivariate regression analysis and a parsimonious model.19601 participants (52.4% women) aged 20 and over had valid protein data. Adjusted regression analysis generated three model fits, with the parsimonious model excluding BMI categories and household income had a statistically insignificant impact on protein intake. Men consumed 23.99g more protein per day compared to women (p<0.001: 95% CI 23.09 to 24.89). Individuals over 65 consumed 13.92g less protein per day compared to those aged 20-35 years old (p<0.001: 95% CI − 15.25 to −12.59). Mexican American individuals consumed 7.47g more protein than Non-Hispanic White individuals (p<0.001: 95% CI 5.89 to 9.04) and Non-Hispanic White individuals consumed 2.95g more protein compared to non-Hispanic Black individuals (p<0.001: 95% CI 4.13 to 1.77). Those with the lowest educational attainment consumed 10.77g less protein compared to individuals with a college degree (p<0.001: 95% CI −12.79 to −8.74). From 2011 to 2020, there was a gradual decline in protein intake which is statistically significant when comparing 2011/12 with 2015/16 and 2017/2020.Protein intake can be predicted by an individual’s gender, age, ethnicity, level of education attainment and time period. This study informs policymakers that individuals aged 65 and above are at risk of insufficient protein intake and there has been a general decrease in protein consumption over time. This provides evidence to support initiatives focused on this age category to maximise change and reduce rates of sarcopenia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)调查研究成人蛋白质摄入量的预测因素
人们普遍认为,达到推荐的蛋白质摄入量可保护肌肉质量(1)。蛋白质摄入不足会加速肌肉疏松症和损害身体机能,导致死亡率和发病率上升。根据美国国家科学院 2005 年发布的数据整理,美国膳食指南的建议目标是每公斤体重摄入 0.8 克蛋白质(2)。目前,约有 50% 的女性和 30% 的男性达不到这一目标(3)。对当前的摄入模式进行分析,以便通过了解影响蛋白质摄入量的因素来改进策略,这是一项关乎公众利益的工作。数据来自美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)网站的公共领域。研究方案获得了美国疾病预防控制中心国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)研究伦理审查委员会的批准。已计算出平均蛋白质摄入量,并报告了参与者的人口统计数据。研究人员使用 STATA 软件对蛋白质摄入量的相关因素进行了二元回归分析、调整后的多元回归分析和解析模型。调整回归分析产生了三个拟合模型,其中解析模型排除了体重指数(BMI)类别,家庭收入对蛋白质摄入量的影响在统计学上并不显著。与女性相比,男性每天多摄入 23.99 克蛋白质(p<0.001:95% CI 23.09 至 24.89)。与 20-35 岁的人相比,65 岁以上的人每天少摄入 13.92 克蛋白质(p<0.001:95% CI - 15.25 至 -12.59)。墨西哥裔美国人比非西班牙裔白人多摄入 7.47 克蛋白质(p<0.001:95% CI 5.89 至 9.04),非西班牙裔白人比非西班牙裔黑人多摄入 2.95 克蛋白质(p<0.001:95% CI 4.13 至 1.77)。教育程度最低的人与拥有大学学位的人相比,蛋白质摄入量要少 10.77 克(p<0.001:95% CI -12.79 至 -8.74)。从 2011 年到 2020 年,蛋白质摄入量逐渐下降,2011/12 年与 2015/16 年和 2017/2020 年相比,蛋白质摄入量下降具有统计学意义。这项研究告诉政策制定者,65 岁及以上人群面临蛋白质摄入不足的风险,而且随着时间的推移,蛋白质摄入量普遍下降。这为支持针对这一年龄段人群的措施提供了证据,以最大限度地改变和降低肌肉疏松症的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society publishes papers and abstracts presented by members and invited speakers at the scientific meetings of The Nutrition Society. The journal provides an invaluable record of the scientific research currently being undertaken, contributing to ''the scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health.'' The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and clinical practice workers in both human and animal nutrition and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Time-Restricted Eating on Body Composition, Biomarkers of Metabolism, Inflammation, Circadian System and Oxidative Stress in Overweight and Obesity: An Exploratory Review. Budgetary Tracking of Food and Nutrition Security Funding in selected Sahel and West Africa regions from 2017-2019. Chronotypical influence on eating behaviour and appetite control. The potential role of the Mediterranean Diet for the treatment and management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a review of the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical evidence. The relationship between dietary greenhouse gas emissions and demographic characteristics in high-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1