Esketamine use for primary intelligent analgesia in adults with severe burns: A double-blind randomized trial with effects on analgesic efficacy, gastrointestinal function and mental state
{"title":"Esketamine use for primary intelligent analgesia in adults with severe burns: A double-blind randomized trial with effects on analgesic efficacy, gastrointestinal function and mental state","authors":"Qiulan He, Qi Liu, Bing Liang, Xu Zhao, Wenqi Huang, Shaowei Gao, Caiyun Chen, Fei Zhou, Zhongxing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opioid consumption for analgesia in burn patients is enormous. Non-opioid analgesics for burn pain management may result in opioid sparing, reducing opioid-related adverse reactions and drug tolerance or addiction. A dual-center, randomized controlled trial assessed Esketamine for perioperative period in patients with severe [20–50 % total body surface area (TBSA)] and extensive ( 50 % TBSA) burns comparing analgesia with standard anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two arms. In the Treatment Arm, patients received intra-operative Esketamine and postoperative intravenous primary intelligent analgesia pump with Esketamine. Patients in the Control Arm received the same intervention as Treatment Arm without Esketamine. The primary endpoint was subjective analgesic efficacy (SAE) evaluated on Day 28 or the day before hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the postoperative Numeric Pain Rating (NPR) Scale at rest (NPRr) and during movement (NPRm) and opium consumption. Gastrointestinal dysfunction Scores (GIDS) and serum markers of intestinal injury [intestinal fatty acid-binding protein 2 (iFabp2) and apolipoproteinA2 (ApoA2)] were measured in the 1st and 4th post-injury weeks. Depression and sleep quality were assessed by relevant questionnaires. Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis. Esketamine-treated Arm recorded a better analgesic efficacy than the Control Arm (proportion of patients with Grade 1 or 2 SAE scores, 67.9 % vs. 40.7 %, 0.022). Esketamine-treated patients had lower NPRm values ( 0.033) and lower daily opioid consumption ( 0.033) when compared with Controls. Esketamine-treated patients showed comparable gastrointestinal recovery to those in the Control Arm. The overall sleep quality might be improved in the Treatment Arm. Esketamine use is safe for perioperative primary intelligent analgesia of severe burns, resulting in improved resting pain control and lower opioid requirements. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry () (ChiCTR2000034069).","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.06.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Opioid consumption for analgesia in burn patients is enormous. Non-opioid analgesics for burn pain management may result in opioid sparing, reducing opioid-related adverse reactions and drug tolerance or addiction. A dual-center, randomized controlled trial assessed Esketamine for perioperative period in patients with severe [20–50 % total body surface area (TBSA)] and extensive ( 50 % TBSA) burns comparing analgesia with standard anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two arms. In the Treatment Arm, patients received intra-operative Esketamine and postoperative intravenous primary intelligent analgesia pump with Esketamine. Patients in the Control Arm received the same intervention as Treatment Arm without Esketamine. The primary endpoint was subjective analgesic efficacy (SAE) evaluated on Day 28 or the day before hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the postoperative Numeric Pain Rating (NPR) Scale at rest (NPRr) and during movement (NPRm) and opium consumption. Gastrointestinal dysfunction Scores (GIDS) and serum markers of intestinal injury [intestinal fatty acid-binding protein 2 (iFabp2) and apolipoproteinA2 (ApoA2)] were measured in the 1st and 4th post-injury weeks. Depression and sleep quality were assessed by relevant questionnaires. Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis. Esketamine-treated Arm recorded a better analgesic efficacy than the Control Arm (proportion of patients with Grade 1 or 2 SAE scores, 67.9 % vs. 40.7 %, 0.022). Esketamine-treated patients had lower NPRm values ( 0.033) and lower daily opioid consumption ( 0.033) when compared with Controls. Esketamine-treated patients showed comparable gastrointestinal recovery to those in the Control Arm. The overall sleep quality might be improved in the Treatment Arm. Esketamine use is safe for perioperative primary intelligent analgesia of severe burns, resulting in improved resting pain control and lower opioid requirements. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry () (ChiCTR2000034069).
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.