Climate and biodiversity impact of beef and lamb production – A case study in Sweden

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104047
Serina Ahlgren , Stefan Wirsenius , Per Toräng , Annelie Carlsson , Anett Seeman , Danira Behaderovic , Olle Kvarnbäck , Nargish Parvin , Anna Hessle
{"title":"Climate and biodiversity impact of beef and lamb production – A case study in Sweden","authors":"Serina Ahlgren ,&nbsp;Stefan Wirsenius ,&nbsp;Per Toräng ,&nbsp;Annelie Carlsson ,&nbsp;Anett Seeman ,&nbsp;Danira Behaderovic ,&nbsp;Olle Kvarnbäck ,&nbsp;Nargish Parvin ,&nbsp;Anna Hessle","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>The climate impact of meat production is a hotly debated topic. What is less often highlighted is that grazing ruminants can have positive impacts on biodiversity.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>The aim of this study was to use a life cycle perspective to assess both the climate and biodiversity impact of different beef and lamb production systems in Sweden.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Applying a life cycle perspective, a quantitative method to assess biodiversity was used, with a scoring system based on land use. For the climate impact calculations, the ClimAg biophysical systems model was used, including emissions from drained organic soils and carbon sequestration in mineral soils. The functional unit was 1 kg carcass weight.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>The results indicated large differences in biodiversity and climate impact between the production systems studied. Dairy bulls had relative low emissions of greenhouse gases, but also a low biodiversity score (a high score indicates higher level of biodiversity). Beef breed steers and heifers had higher emissions of greenhouse gases but a higher biodiversity score, suggesting a trade-off between climate and biodiversity impact. Also for lamb meat, greenhouse gas emissions vary among production systems. A system with winter born lambs slaughtered in spring, closely followed by spring born lambs slaughtered in autumn, had the lowest emissions, while spring born lambs slaughtered in winter had the highest emissions. Winter lambs on the other hand, had a relatively high biodiversity score, due to a long rearing period and an extensive land use with a high proportion of semi-natural grasslands.</p><p>Climate impact was in all systems related to methane from enteric fermentation, emissions from manure storage, and emissions from organic soils. With the assumptions made in this study, soil carbon sequestration is suggested to reduce the climate impact by 5–7% of the total emissions. Biodiversity impact was in all systems positively related to the amount of grazing in permanent grasslands, in particular semi-natural grasslands. Because semi-natural grasslands are among the most species rich terrestrial ecosystems in Europe, a large surface area grazed resulted in high biodiversity scores in the present model.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>This study used a novel approach for biodiversity assessment, where the positive contribution of semi-natural grasslands to biodiversity was quantified and put in relation to the modelled climate impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24001975/pdfft?md5=c9e101e51d9d4f1534484ffacb1adb69&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24001975-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24001975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

The climate impact of meat production is a hotly debated topic. What is less often highlighted is that grazing ruminants can have positive impacts on biodiversity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to use a life cycle perspective to assess both the climate and biodiversity impact of different beef and lamb production systems in Sweden.

METHODS

Applying a life cycle perspective, a quantitative method to assess biodiversity was used, with a scoring system based on land use. For the climate impact calculations, the ClimAg biophysical systems model was used, including emissions from drained organic soils and carbon sequestration in mineral soils. The functional unit was 1 kg carcass weight.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated large differences in biodiversity and climate impact between the production systems studied. Dairy bulls had relative low emissions of greenhouse gases, but also a low biodiversity score (a high score indicates higher level of biodiversity). Beef breed steers and heifers had higher emissions of greenhouse gases but a higher biodiversity score, suggesting a trade-off between climate and biodiversity impact. Also for lamb meat, greenhouse gas emissions vary among production systems. A system with winter born lambs slaughtered in spring, closely followed by spring born lambs slaughtered in autumn, had the lowest emissions, while spring born lambs slaughtered in winter had the highest emissions. Winter lambs on the other hand, had a relatively high biodiversity score, due to a long rearing period and an extensive land use with a high proportion of semi-natural grasslands.

Climate impact was in all systems related to methane from enteric fermentation, emissions from manure storage, and emissions from organic soils. With the assumptions made in this study, soil carbon sequestration is suggested to reduce the climate impact by 5–7% of the total emissions. Biodiversity impact was in all systems positively related to the amount of grazing in permanent grasslands, in particular semi-natural grasslands. Because semi-natural grasslands are among the most species rich terrestrial ecosystems in Europe, a large surface area grazed resulted in high biodiversity scores in the present model.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study used a novel approach for biodiversity assessment, where the positive contribution of semi-natural grasslands to biodiversity was quantified and put in relation to the modelled climate impact.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛羊肉生产对气候和生物多样性的影响 - 瑞典案例研究
背景肉类生产对气候的影响是一个备受争议的话题。本研究的目的是采用生命周期视角评估瑞典不同牛羊肉生产系统对气候和生物多样性的影响。方法采用生命周期视角,使用定量方法评估生物多样性,并根据土地利用情况建立评分系统。气候影响计算采用 ClimAg 生物物理系统模型,包括排水有机土壤的排放和矿质土壤的固碳。结果和结论结果表明,所研究的生产系统之间在生物多样性和气候影响方面存在巨大差异。奶牛的温室气体排放量相对较低,但生物多样性得分也较低(得分高表示生物多样性水平较高)。肉牛种公牛和母牛的温室气体排放量较高,但生物多样性得分较高,这表明气候和生物多样性影响之间存在权衡。羔羊肉的温室气体排放量也因生产系统而异。冬天出生的羔羊在春天屠宰,紧随其后的是春天出生的羔羊在秋天屠宰,这种生产系统的排放量最低,而春天出生的羔羊在冬天屠宰,排放量最高。另一方面,冬季羔羊的生物多样性得分相对较高,原因是饲养时间较长,且土地利用广泛,半天然草地比例较高。气候影响在所有系统中都与肠道发酵产生的甲烷、粪便储存产生的排放物以及有机土壤产生的排放物有关。根据本研究的假设,土壤固碳可将气候影响减少总排放量的 5-7%。在所有系统中,生物多样性影响都与永久性草地的放牧量呈正相关,尤其是半天然草地。由于半天然草地是欧洲物种最丰富的陆地生态系统之一,因此在本模型中,大面积放牧会导致较高的生物多样性得分。 意义本研究采用了一种新颖的生物多样性评估方法,量化了半天然草地对生物多样性的积极贡献,并将其与模拟的气候影响联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Regional-scale trade-offs among beef production, emissions and land use impacts: A cattle diet composition perspective Perceived resilience of community supported agriculture in Germany Integrating production, ecology and livelihood confers an efficiency-driven farming system based on the sustainable farmland framework Eco-efficiency in the agricultural landscape of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany Developing a sustainable assessment framework for identifying industrial water suitability: Perspective on the water-energy-food nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1