Geomechanical assessment of the Cenozoic stratigraphy of the Tui area, Taranaki Basin, offshore New Zealand – Implications for geological storage in the Paleocene and Eocene sandstones

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104194
Souvik Sen , Ahmed A. Radwan , Mahmoud Leila , Ahmed Abdelmaksoud , Moamen Ali
{"title":"Geomechanical assessment of the Cenozoic stratigraphy of the Tui area, Taranaki Basin, offshore New Zealand – Implications for geological storage in the Paleocene and Eocene sandstones","authors":"Souvik Sen ,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Radwan ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Leila ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdelmaksoud ,&nbsp;Moamen Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a geomechanical assessment of the 4km thick Paleocene-Pleistocene succession of the Tui field area from Taranaki Basin, offshore New Zealand. Based on the core measurements, suitable rock-mechanical models have been presented for static and dynamic elastic properties and rock strength. The Cenozoic stratigraphy is inferred to be normally compacted and devoid of any notable overpressure. Based on the C-quality stress indicators, we infer a 16.48 MPa/km minimum horizontal stress gradient, while the static elastic property-based model suggests a maximum horizontal stress gradient of around 21.15 MPa/km. The estimated in-situ stress magnitudes of the Paleocene-Miocene interval indicate a normal to strike-slip transitional stress regime (SHMax ∼Sv&gt; Shmin). The petrographic and routine core analysis reported medium to coarse-grained, macro-megaporous sub-arkose arenites within the Paleocene Farewell sandstone and Eocene Kaimiro sandstone, which were considered as suitable candidates for geological storage. We analysed the injection stress paths for these two storage units as a result of pore pressure build-up and consequent stress perturbations. The maximum sustainable injection threshold is determined to ensure storage integrity. The conventional approach exhibits a 5-6 MPa repressurization window, while a much higher build-up threshold has been inferred from the model by utilizing pore pressure-stress coupling effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a geomechanical assessment of the 4km thick Paleocene-Pleistocene succession of the Tui field area from Taranaki Basin, offshore New Zealand. Based on the core measurements, suitable rock-mechanical models have been presented for static and dynamic elastic properties and rock strength. The Cenozoic stratigraphy is inferred to be normally compacted and devoid of any notable overpressure. Based on the C-quality stress indicators, we infer a 16.48 MPa/km minimum horizontal stress gradient, while the static elastic property-based model suggests a maximum horizontal stress gradient of around 21.15 MPa/km. The estimated in-situ stress magnitudes of the Paleocene-Miocene interval indicate a normal to strike-slip transitional stress regime (SHMax ∼Sv> Shmin). The petrographic and routine core analysis reported medium to coarse-grained, macro-megaporous sub-arkose arenites within the Paleocene Farewell sandstone and Eocene Kaimiro sandstone, which were considered as suitable candidates for geological storage. We analysed the injection stress paths for these two storage units as a result of pore pressure build-up and consequent stress perturbations. The maximum sustainable injection threshold is determined to ensure storage integrity. The conventional approach exhibits a 5-6 MPa repressurization window, while a much higher build-up threshold has been inferred from the model by utilizing pore pressure-stress coupling effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰近海塔拉纳基盆地图伊地区新生代地层的地质力学评估--对古新世和始新世砂岩地质储存的影响
本研究对新西兰近海塔拉纳基盆地图伊油田区厚达 4 千米的古新世-早更新世演替进行了地质力学评估。在岩心测量的基础上,针对静态和动态弹性特性以及岩石强度提出了合适的岩石力学模型。据推断,新生代地层为正常密实地层,没有任何明显的超压。根据 C 级应力指标,我们推断最小水平应力梯度为 16.48 兆帕/千米,而基于静态弹性特性的模型则表明最大水平应力梯度约为 21.15 兆帕/千米。估算的古新世-中新世区间的原位应力幅值表明,这是一个从正向到走向滑动的过渡应力体系(SHMax ∼Sv> Shmin)。岩相和常规岩心分析表明,在古新世法雷威尔砂岩和始新世凯米洛砂岩中存在中粗粒、大孔隙次赤砂岩,被认为是地质储层的合适候选岩体。我们分析了这两个封存单元因孔隙压力增大和随之而来的应力扰动而产生的注入应力路径。我们确定了最大可持续注入阈值,以确保封存的完整性。传统方法显示了一个 5-6 兆帕的再增压窗口,而利用孔隙压力-应力耦合效应从模型中推断出了一个更高的增压阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Pre-screening of induced seismicity risks for CO2 injection at Trüllikon, Switzerland Numerical simulation of impurity-containing supercritical CO2 pipeline transport in CCUS Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in aquifers – workflows and practices A review of CO2-injection projects in the Brazilian Pre-Salt — Storage capacity and geomechanical constraints Oxyfuel combustion based carbon capture onboard ships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1