Can performance pressure hinder service recovery performance? The mediating role of shame and individual contingencies of work meaningfulness and proactivity

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Tourism Management Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104972
Xingyu Wang , Yitong Yu , Jingwen Yan , Aysin Pasamehmetoglu
{"title":"Can performance pressure hinder service recovery performance? The mediating role of shame and individual contingencies of work meaningfulness and proactivity","authors":"Xingyu Wang ,&nbsp;Yitong Yu ,&nbsp;Jingwen Yan ,&nbsp;Aysin Pasamehmetoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hospitality employees have long been experiencing high pressure at work, due to the strict performance requirements from organizations and excessive socioemotional demands from customers. Although “performing well under pressure” is often considered a prerequisite for competent employees, findings from organizational psychologists regarding employees' responses to perceived performance pressure are divergent. To further elucidate this relationship, drawing upon the social self-preservation theory, this research proposes that performance pressure can elicit frontline employees' emotional experience of shame, which in turn, hampers their service recovery performance. Furthermore, we propose two individual contingencies of work meaningfulness and proactivity that alter employees' reactions to performance pressure. In particular, the experience of shame is more salient when employees perceive lower levels of meaningfulness or possess lower levels of proactivity. A mixed-method approach, involving both scenario-based experiment and multi-wave survey, is adopted. The results support our hypotheses. The findings provide a more holistic understanding of hospitality employees’ responses to performance pressure by uncovering the rarely investigated emotional pathway following performance pressure and identifying two salient individual boundary conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48469,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Management","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104972"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517724000918/pdfft?md5=6cf63905f70e5824ef16c85d879d7a45&pid=1-s2.0-S0261517724000918-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517724000918","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospitality employees have long been experiencing high pressure at work, due to the strict performance requirements from organizations and excessive socioemotional demands from customers. Although “performing well under pressure” is often considered a prerequisite for competent employees, findings from organizational psychologists regarding employees' responses to perceived performance pressure are divergent. To further elucidate this relationship, drawing upon the social self-preservation theory, this research proposes that performance pressure can elicit frontline employees' emotional experience of shame, which in turn, hampers their service recovery performance. Furthermore, we propose two individual contingencies of work meaningfulness and proactivity that alter employees' reactions to performance pressure. In particular, the experience of shame is more salient when employees perceive lower levels of meaningfulness or possess lower levels of proactivity. A mixed-method approach, involving both scenario-based experiment and multi-wave survey, is adopted. The results support our hypotheses. The findings provide a more holistic understanding of hospitality employees’ responses to performance pressure by uncovering the rarely investigated emotional pathway following performance pressure and identifying two salient individual boundary conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绩效压力会阻碍服务恢复绩效吗?羞耻感的中介作用以及工作意义和主动性的个体偶然性
长期以来,由于组织对业绩的严格要求和顾客对社会情感的过度需求,酒店业员工一直承受着巨大的工作压力。虽然 "在压力下表现出色 "通常被认为是合格员工的必备条件,但组织心理学家对员工感知到的绩效压力的反应却有不同的研究结果。为了进一步阐明这种关系,本研究借鉴社会自我保护理论,提出绩效压力会引发一线员工的羞愧情绪体验,进而影响他们的服务恢复绩效。此外,我们还提出了工作意义和积极主动这两个改变员工对绩效压力反应的个体或然因素。特别是,当员工认为工作意义较小或工作积极性较低时,羞愧感会更加突出。研究采用了混合方法,包括情景实验和多波调查。结果支持我们的假设。研究结果揭示了绩效压力后很少被调查的情绪路径,并确定了两个突出的个体边界条件,从而为酒店业员工对绩效压力的反应提供了更全面的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tourism Management
Tourism Management Multiple-
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
190
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Tourism Management, the preeminent scholarly journal, concentrates on the comprehensive management aspects, encompassing planning and policy, within the realm of travel and tourism. Adopting an interdisciplinary perspective, the journal delves into international, national, and regional tourism, addressing various management challenges. Its content mirrors this integrative approach, featuring primary research articles, progress in tourism research, case studies, research notes, discussions on current issues, and book reviews. Emphasizing scholarly rigor, all published papers are expected to contribute to theoretical and/or methodological advancements while offering specific insights relevant to tourism management and policy.
期刊最新文献
To vote or not to vote? The impact of gratitude expression on helpfulness voting in peer-to-peer accommodation reviews AI-generated imagery in sustainable gastronomy tourism: A study from bottom-up to top-down processing Nature and adventure tourism rarely generate awe or pro-environmental behaviours: Conceptual and methodological rejoinder Digital nudging for sustainable tourist behavior in new media Construal level theory and online reviews: A search stage perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1