When ideologies align: Progressive corporate activism and within‐firm ideological alignment

IF 6.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1002/smj.3632
Anna E. McKean, Brayden G. King
{"title":"When ideologies align: Progressive corporate activism and within‐firm ideological alignment","authors":"Anna E. McKean, Brayden G. King","doi":"10.1002/smj.3632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research SummaryThis article examines the association between ideology and firm participation in sociopolitical activism. In particular, it focuses on the ideological alignment between a firm's upper echelons and its general employees. We theorize that participation in progressive corporate activism reflects the ideological views of both the top management team and general employees. By examining firm participation in letter campaigns supporting progressive causes, our findings indicate that ideological alignment between a top management teams and general employees' liberal political leanings is associated with a firm's participation in progressive corporate activism. The CEO's own ideological preferences do not have an independent association with this kind of activism. This article concludes with a discussion of implications for our understanding of corporate political action and nonmarket strategy.Managerial SummaryThis article looks at the relationship between political ideology and firm participation in sociopolitical activism. Although some have argued that firms' activism reflects a CEO's ideological preferences or employee activism, we find that neither explanation fully accounts for the kinds of companies that engage in this kind of activism. We find that progressive corporate activism reflects the ideological views of both top management and general employees. Our findings suggest that companies that have ideological alignment on progressive issues are more likely to take public stands on those issues because the stands reinforce core values held by employees and the top management.","PeriodicalId":22023,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3632","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research SummaryThis article examines the association between ideology and firm participation in sociopolitical activism. In particular, it focuses on the ideological alignment between a firm's upper echelons and its general employees. We theorize that participation in progressive corporate activism reflects the ideological views of both the top management team and general employees. By examining firm participation in letter campaigns supporting progressive causes, our findings indicate that ideological alignment between a top management teams and general employees' liberal political leanings is associated with a firm's participation in progressive corporate activism. The CEO's own ideological preferences do not have an independent association with this kind of activism. This article concludes with a discussion of implications for our understanding of corporate political action and nonmarket strategy.Managerial SummaryThis article looks at the relationship between political ideology and firm participation in sociopolitical activism. Although some have argued that firms' activism reflects a CEO's ideological preferences or employee activism, we find that neither explanation fully accounts for the kinds of companies that engage in this kind of activism. We find that progressive corporate activism reflects the ideological views of both top management and general employees. Our findings suggest that companies that have ideological alignment on progressive issues are more likely to take public stands on those issues because the stands reinforce core values held by employees and the top management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当意识形态一致时:渐进式公司行动主义与公司内部意识形态一致
研究摘要 本文探讨了意识形态与企业参与社会政治活动之间的关联。文章尤其关注企业高层与普通员工在意识形态上的一致性。我们的理论是,参与进步企业活动反映了高层管理团队和普通员工的意识形态观点。通过研究企业参与支持进步事业的信函活动,我们的研究结果表明,企业高层管理团队与普通员工的自由政治倾向之间的意识形态一致性与企业参与进步企业活动有关。首席执行官本人的意识形态偏好与这种积极行动并无独立关联。本文最后讨论了对我们理解企业政治行动和非市场战略的启示。 本文探讨了政治意识形态与企业参与社会政治行动主义之间的关系。尽管有人认为企业的激进主义反映了首席执行官的意识形态偏好或员工的激进主义,但我们发现,这两种解释都不能完全解释参与此类激进主义的企业类型。我们发现,渐进式公司激进主义反映了高层管理人员和普通员工的意识形态观点。我们的研究结果表明,在进步问题上意识形态一致的公司更有可能在这些问题上采取公开立场,因为这些立场强化了员工和高层管理者的核心价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.40%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: At the Strategic Management Journal, we are committed to publishing top-tier research that addresses key questions in the field of strategic management and captivates scholars in this area. Our publication welcomes manuscripts covering a wide range of topics, perspectives, and research methodologies. As a result, our editorial decisions truly embrace the diversity inherent in the field.
期刊最新文献
More is (sometimes) merrier: Heterogeneity in demand spillovers and competition on a digital platform How do US firms grow? New evidence from a growth decomposition Strategic restraint: When do human‐capital‐intensive companies choose (not) to use noncompete agreements? Organizational adaptation in dynamic environments: Disentangling the effects of how much to explore versus where to explore Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta‐analytic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1