Updating Swedish hunting harvest estimates of open season game based on new methods and documented data

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY European Journal of Wildlife Research Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s10344-024-01820-4
Tom Lindström, Paula Jonsson, Felicia Skorsdal, Göran Bergqvist
{"title":"Updating Swedish hunting harvest estimates of open season game based on new methods and documented data","authors":"Tom Lindström, Paula Jonsson, Felicia Skorsdal, Göran Bergqvist","doi":"10.1007/s10344-024-01820-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reliable hunting bag statistics are central for informed wildlife management. In the absence of complete reporting, hunting harvest must be estimated based on partial data, which requires reliable data and appropriate statistical methods. In the Swedish system, hunting teams, whose positions are known to the level of Hunting Management Precincts (HMPs), report their harvest of open season game and the size of the land on which they hunt, and the harvest on the non-reported area is estimated based on the reports. In this study, we improved data quality by solving several identified issues in the spatial data and provided temporally consistent estimates of huntable land (EHL) based on documented assumptions. We applied a recently developed method, the Bayesian Hierarchical and Autoregressive Estimation of Hunting Harvest (BaHAREHH), to harvest reports of 34 species from 2003–2021, using both previous and updated EHL, and compared harvest estimates to previously available estimates using naïve linear extrapolation (LE), which has been used as Sweden’s official harvest statistics. We found that updating EHL had a minor effect on harvest estimates at the national level but sometimes had a large impact at the level of individual HMPs. At the national level, previous LE estimates were similar to updated BaHAREHH estimates for species harvested at large numbers, but discrepancies were observed for species harvested at low rates. Time series of harvest estimated with LE had exaggerated temporal trends, higher coefficient of variation, and lower autcorrelation. At the level of counties and HMPs, there were substantial differences for all species, with some harvest estimates differing by several orders of magnitude. We conclude that the previously available LE estimates are sensitive to individual reports that add variability to the estimates and are, for some species, unreliable, especially at the level of county and HMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":51044,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01820-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable hunting bag statistics are central for informed wildlife management. In the absence of complete reporting, hunting harvest must be estimated based on partial data, which requires reliable data and appropriate statistical methods. In the Swedish system, hunting teams, whose positions are known to the level of Hunting Management Precincts (HMPs), report their harvest of open season game and the size of the land on which they hunt, and the harvest on the non-reported area is estimated based on the reports. In this study, we improved data quality by solving several identified issues in the spatial data and provided temporally consistent estimates of huntable land (EHL) based on documented assumptions. We applied a recently developed method, the Bayesian Hierarchical and Autoregressive Estimation of Hunting Harvest (BaHAREHH), to harvest reports of 34 species from 2003–2021, using both previous and updated EHL, and compared harvest estimates to previously available estimates using naïve linear extrapolation (LE), which has been used as Sweden’s official harvest statistics. We found that updating EHL had a minor effect on harvest estimates at the national level but sometimes had a large impact at the level of individual HMPs. At the national level, previous LE estimates were similar to updated BaHAREHH estimates for species harvested at large numbers, but discrepancies were observed for species harvested at low rates. Time series of harvest estimated with LE had exaggerated temporal trends, higher coefficient of variation, and lower autcorrelation. At the level of counties and HMPs, there were substantial differences for all species, with some harvest estimates differing by several orders of magnitude. We conclude that the previously available LE estimates are sensitive to individual reports that add variability to the estimates and are, for some species, unreliable, especially at the level of county and HMP.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据新方法和有记录的数据更新瑞典开放季节猎物的狩猎收成估计值
可靠的狩猎袋统计数据是进行知情野生动物管理的核心。在没有完整报告的情况下,必须根据部分数据来估算狩猎收获量,这就需要可靠的数据和适当的统计方法。在瑞典的系统中,狩猎队(其位置在狩猎管理分区(HMP)一级是已知的)会报告他们在开放季节狩猎的收获量和狩猎地的面积,而未报告区域的收获量则根据报告进行估算。在这项研究中,我们通过解决空间数据中发现的几个问题提高了数据质量,并根据记录的假设提供了时间上一致的可猎捕土地(EHL)估算值。我们将最近开发的贝叶斯分层和自回归狩猎收获量估算(BaHAREHH)方法应用于 2003-2021 年间 34 个物种的收获量报告,同时使用以前的和更新的 EHL,并将收获量估算值与以前使用天真线性外推法(LE)获得的估算值进行比较,后者一直被用作瑞典的官方收获量统计数据。我们发现,在国家层面,更新 EHL 对采伐量估计值的影响较小,但有时对单个 HMP 的影响较大。在国家层面,对于大量捕获的物种,以前的 LE 估计值与更新的 BaHAREH 估计值相似,但对于低捕获率的物种,则存在差异。用 LE 估算的收获量时间序列具有夸大的时间趋势、较高的变异系数和较低的自相关性。在县和 HMP 层面上,所有物种都存在巨大差异,有些物种的捕获量估计值相差几个数量级。我们的结论是,以前可用的 LE 估计值对个体报告很敏感,增加了估计值的变异性,而且对某些物种来说不可靠,特别是在县和 HMP 层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wildlife Research focuses on all aspects of wildlife biology. Main areas are: applied wildlife ecology; diseases affecting wildlife population dynamics, conservation, economy or public health; ecotoxicology; management for conservation, hunting or pest control; population genetics; and the sustainable use of wildlife as a natural resource. Contributions to socio-cultural aspects of human-wildlife relationships and to the history and sociology of hunting will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Hunting bag statistics of wild mammals in Portugal (1989–2022): on the need to improve data report and compilation Observation of threatened pinyon jays Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus in the EU pet market as a potential additional threat Dietary differences in males and females of a strongly sexually dimorphic ungulate Understanding the patterns and predictors of human-elephant conflict in Tamil Nadu, India Two neotropical spotted felids in the Nevado de Toluca Volcano? The highest altitude records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1