Assessment of Tracheostomy Tube Placement and Late Change Practices in an Academic Tertiary Care Center.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1776723
Christophe Abi Zeid Daou, Elsa Maria Chahine, Randa Barazi
{"title":"Assessment of Tracheostomy Tube Placement and Late Change Practices in an Academic Tertiary Care Center.","authors":"Christophe Abi Zeid Daou, Elsa Maria Chahine, Randa Barazi","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The optimal time for tracheostomy changes is unknown. Most surgeons opt to wait until five to seven days postoperatively, while more recent studies suggest that changes occurring as early as two to three days postoperatively are also safe. <b>Objective</b>  To evaluate the safety of changing the tracheostomy tube later than 14 days postoperatively. <b>Methods</b>  The charts of patients who underwent tracheostomy placement and change at a tertiary care center from 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed, and the subjects were divided into 2 cohorts (late and very late), depending on the time of the first tracheostomy change. <b>Results</b>  The study included 198 patients, 53 of whom aged between 0 and 18 years, and 145, aged > 18 years. The time until the first tracheostomy change was on average of 131.1 days. The most common indication for tracheostomy tube placement was prolonged intubation. Adverse events were observed in 30.8% of the cases (the most common being the formation of granulation tissue), a rate that does not differ much from the incidence reported in the literature (of 34% to 77%) when tracheostomy tubes are changed as early as 3 to 7 days postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between patients undergoing late and very late changes ( <i>p</i>  = 0.688), or between pediatric and adult subjects ( <i>p</i>  = 0.36). There were no significant correlations regarding the time of the first or second change and the incidence of complications (r = -0.014; <i>p</i>  = 0.84 for the first change; and r = -0.57; <i>p</i>  = 0.64 for the second change). <b>Conclusion</b>  The late first tracheostomy tube change was safe and could save resources and decrease the financial burden of frequent changes. It is always crucial to provide adequate information about home tracheostomy care for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"28 3","pages":"e407-e414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  The optimal time for tracheostomy changes is unknown. Most surgeons opt to wait until five to seven days postoperatively, while more recent studies suggest that changes occurring as early as two to three days postoperatively are also safe. Objective  To evaluate the safety of changing the tracheostomy tube later than 14 days postoperatively. Methods  The charts of patients who underwent tracheostomy placement and change at a tertiary care center from 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed, and the subjects were divided into 2 cohorts (late and very late), depending on the time of the first tracheostomy change. Results  The study included 198 patients, 53 of whom aged between 0 and 18 years, and 145, aged > 18 years. The time until the first tracheostomy change was on average of 131.1 days. The most common indication for tracheostomy tube placement was prolonged intubation. Adverse events were observed in 30.8% of the cases (the most common being the formation of granulation tissue), a rate that does not differ much from the incidence reported in the literature (of 34% to 77%) when tracheostomy tubes are changed as early as 3 to 7 days postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between patients undergoing late and very late changes ( p  = 0.688), or between pediatric and adult subjects ( p  = 0.36). There were no significant correlations regarding the time of the first or second change and the incidence of complications (r = -0.014; p  = 0.84 for the first change; and r = -0.57; p  = 0.64 for the second change). Conclusion  The late first tracheostomy tube change was safe and could save resources and decrease the financial burden of frequent changes. It is always crucial to provide adequate information about home tracheostomy care for patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估一家学术性三级护理中心的气管造口术置管和晚期更换实践。
导言:气管造口更换的最佳时间尚不清楚。大多数外科医生选择等到术后五到七天,而最近的研究表明,术后两到三天内更换气管造口管也是安全的。目的 评估术后 14 天后更换气管造口管的安全性。方法 回顾性审查 2015 年至 2019 年在一家三级医疗中心接受气管造口置入和更换的患者病历,并根据首次更换气管造口的时间将受试者分为 2 个队列(晚期和极晚期)。结果 研究共纳入 198 名患者,其中 53 人年龄在 0 至 18 岁之间,145 人年龄大于 18 岁。首次更换气管造口的时间平均为 131.1 天。放置气管造口管最常见的适应症是长时间插管。30.8%的病例出现了不良反应(最常见的是肉芽组织的形成),这一比例与文献中报道的术后3至7天就更换气管造口管的发生率(34%至77%)相差不大。晚换和极晚换气管造口管的患者并发症发生率无明显差异(P = 0.688),儿科和成人受试者的并发症发生率也无明显差异(P = 0.36)。第一次或第二次更换气管造口的时间与并发症的发生率无明显相关性(第一次更换气管造口的相关性为 r = -0.014;p = 0.84;第二次更换气管造口的相关性为 r = -0.57;p = 0.64)。结论 延迟首次气管造口管更换是安全的,可节省资源并减轻频繁更换的经济负担。为患者提供充分的家庭气管造口护理信息始终是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Audiological Characterization of Individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome. Do Anatomical Variations of Sphenoid Sinus Influence Sella Exposure and Residual Disease in Pituitary Surgery? - A Study in an Indian Population. Dysphagia: Focus in Diagnosis. Efficacy of Expansion Pharyngoplasty without Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy Screening in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Results of a New Treatment Protocol for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Betamethasone for Intratympanic Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1