AI Shaming: The Silent Stigma among Academic Writers and Researchers

IF 3 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Annals of Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s10439-024-03582-1
Louie Giray
{"title":"AI Shaming: The Silent Stigma among Academic Writers and Researchers","authors":"Louie Giray","doi":"10.1007/s10439-024-03582-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>AI shaming refers to the practice of criticizing or looking down on individuals or organizations for using AI to generate content or perform tasks. AI shaming has emerged as a recent phenomenon in academia. This paper examines the characteristics, causes, and effects of AI shaming on academic writers and researchers. AI shaming often involves dismissing the validity or authenticity of AI-assisted work, suggesting that using AI is deceitful, lazy, or less valuable than human-only efforts. The paper identifies various profiles of individuals who engage in AI shaming, including traditionalists, technophobes, and elitists, and explores their motivations. The effects of AI shaming are multifaceted, ranging from inhibited technology adoption and stifled innovation to increased stress among researchers and missed opportunities for efficiency. These consequences may hinder academic progress and limit the potential benefits of AI in research and scholarship. Despite these challenges, the paper argues that academic writers and researchers should not be ashamed of using AI when done responsibly and ethically. By embracing AI as a tool to augment human capabilities and by being transparent about its use, academic writers and researchers can lead the way in demonstrating responsible AI integration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-024-03582-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI shaming refers to the practice of criticizing or looking down on individuals or organizations for using AI to generate content or perform tasks. AI shaming has emerged as a recent phenomenon in academia. This paper examines the characteristics, causes, and effects of AI shaming on academic writers and researchers. AI shaming often involves dismissing the validity or authenticity of AI-assisted work, suggesting that using AI is deceitful, lazy, or less valuable than human-only efforts. The paper identifies various profiles of individuals who engage in AI shaming, including traditionalists, technophobes, and elitists, and explores their motivations. The effects of AI shaming are multifaceted, ranging from inhibited technology adoption and stifled innovation to increased stress among researchers and missed opportunities for efficiency. These consequences may hinder academic progress and limit the potential benefits of AI in research and scholarship. Despite these challenges, the paper argues that academic writers and researchers should not be ashamed of using AI when done responsibly and ethically. By embracing AI as a tool to augment human capabilities and by being transparent about its use, academic writers and researchers can lead the way in demonstrating responsible AI integration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI 耻辱:学术作家和研究人员中无声的耻辱。
人工智能羞辱指的是批评或看不起使用人工智能生成内容或执行任务的个人或组织的做法。人工智能羞辱是最近学术界出现的一种现象。本文探讨了人工智能羞辱的特点、原因以及对学术作家和研究人员的影响。人工智能羞辱通常涉及否定人工智能辅助工作的有效性或真实性,暗示使用人工智能是欺骗、懒惰或不如纯人工工作有价值。本文指出了参与人工智能羞辱的各种人的特征,包括传统主义者、技术恐惧者和精英主义者,并探讨了他们的动机。人工智能羞辱的影响是多方面的,从抑制技术应用和扼杀创新,到增加研究人员的压力和错失提高效率的机会,不一而足。这些后果可能会阻碍学术进步,限制人工智能在研究和学术方面的潜在效益。尽管存在这些挑战,本文认为,学术写作者和研究人员不应该为使用人工智能而感到羞耻,只要以负责任和合乎道德的方式使用人工智能。通过将人工智能作为增强人类能力的工具,并对其使用保持透明,学术作家和研究人员可以带头展示负责任的人工智能整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Sound Analysis to Reveal Hemodynamic Conditions of Arteriovenous Fistulae for Hemodialysis. Active Machine Learning for Pre-procedural Prediction of Time-Varying Boundary Condition After Fontan Procedure Using Generative Adversarial Networks. Simulating Pelvis Kinematics from Belt and Seat Loading in Frontal Car Crash Scenarios: Important Boundary Conditions that Influence the Outcome. Lumbar Spine Orientation Affects Compressive Fracture Outcome. An In vivo Pilot Study to Estimate the Swelling of the Aneurysm Wall Rabbit Model Generated with Pulsed Fluid Against the Aneurysm Wall.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1