Ultrafiltration Patterns during Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Findings and Insights to Peritoneal Physiology.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000000000506
Osama El Shamy, Nicole Wyatt, Sagar Patel, Naief Abudaff, Robert Greevy, Andrew Guide, Ankur D Shah, Juan Pablo Arroyo, Thomas A Golper
{"title":"Ultrafiltration Patterns during Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Findings and Insights to Peritoneal Physiology.","authors":"Osama El Shamy, Nicole Wyatt, Sagar Patel, Naief Abudaff, Robert Greevy, Andrew Guide, Ankur D Shah, Juan Pablo Arroyo, Thomas A Golper","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000000000506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the growing use of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), it is important to improve our knowledge of the clinical patterns and physiology of APD treatment sessions. The ultrafiltration (UF) achieved during each cycle of an APD treatment is assumed to be relatively linear if the delivered prescription is the same. We set out to determine if that is indeed the case.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, cross-sectional study of prevalent PD patients. All adult APD patients (> 18 years of age), who had been on PD for >3 months, and >3 months on APD were included. Continuous ambulatory PD patients or those with peritonitis within 3 months of the consent date were excluded. Individual treatment data from 7 consecutive APD treatment sessions with consistent dialysate composition for each cycler exchange were collected for each subject.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine subjects met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The probability of yielding a positive UF was 48.9% for cycle 1, rising to 90.5% by cycle 6. Adjusting for average dextrose concentration, dwell time, fill volume, solute transfer rate, and number of cycles, we observed that cycles 2 through 6 achieved progressively higher UF volumes than cycle 1 (p < 0.001). The first and last cycles demonstrated significantly different cycle UF volumes compared to a middle cycle (-230 ml and 277 ml, respectively, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed a consistent increase in UF volumes achieved per cycle over the course of an APD treatment session with numerous clinical and physiologic implications. This provides the foundation for future studies investigating peritoneal inter-cycle variations and membrane physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000000000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the growing use of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), it is important to improve our knowledge of the clinical patterns and physiology of APD treatment sessions. The ultrafiltration (UF) achieved during each cycle of an APD treatment is assumed to be relatively linear if the delivered prescription is the same. We set out to determine if that is indeed the case.

Methods: Single-center, cross-sectional study of prevalent PD patients. All adult APD patients (> 18 years of age), who had been on PD for >3 months, and >3 months on APD were included. Continuous ambulatory PD patients or those with peritonitis within 3 months of the consent date were excluded. Individual treatment data from 7 consecutive APD treatment sessions with consistent dialysate composition for each cycler exchange were collected for each subject.

Results: Thirty-nine subjects met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The probability of yielding a positive UF was 48.9% for cycle 1, rising to 90.5% by cycle 6. Adjusting for average dextrose concentration, dwell time, fill volume, solute transfer rate, and number of cycles, we observed that cycles 2 through 6 achieved progressively higher UF volumes than cycle 1 (p < 0.001). The first and last cycles demonstrated significantly different cycle UF volumes compared to a middle cycle (-230 ml and 277 ml, respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: We observed a consistent increase in UF volumes achieved per cycle over the course of an APD treatment session with numerous clinical and physiologic implications. This provides the foundation for future studies investigating peritoneal inter-cycle variations and membrane physiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动腹膜透析过程中的超滤模式:腹膜生理学的发现与启示。
背景:随着自动腹膜透析(APD)的应用日益广泛,我们有必要进一步了解 APD 治疗疗程的临床模式和生理学知识。如果提供的处方相同,则在 APD 治疗的每个周期中实现的超滤 (UF) 会相对线性。我们试图确定情况是否确实如此:单中心、横断面研究,针对流行性肺结核患者。所有服用帕金森病药超过 3 个月和服用 APD 超过 3 个月的成年 APD 患者(年龄大于 18 岁)均被纳入研究范围。不包括连续卧床的腹膜透析患者或在同意日期后 3 个月内患有腹膜炎的患者。收集每个受试者连续 7 次 APD 治疗的个人治疗数据,每次循环器交换的透析液成分保持一致:结果:39 名受试者符合纳入标准并被纳入。在第 1 个周期中,UF 呈阳性的概率为 48.9%,到第 6 个周期时上升到 90.5%。根据平均葡萄糖浓度、停留时间、填充量、溶质转移率和循环次数进行调整后,我们发现第 2 至第 6 个循环的超滤量逐渐高于第 1 个循环(p < 0.001)。与中间循环相比,第一和最后一个循环的超滤量有显著差异(分别为-230 毫升和 277 毫升,p < 0.001):我们观察到,在 APD 治疗过程中,每个周期获得的 UF 量持续增加,这对临床和生理学有许多影响。这为今后研究腹膜周期间变化和膜生理学奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Association of Heart Failure and Edema Events between Patients Initiating SZC or Patiromer. Changes in 24-hour Urine Chemistry in Patients with Nephrolithiasis during Weight Loss with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Based Therapies. A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Identify Causes of Sex Differences in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation Process. Renal Disease and Kidney Transplantation in Hispanic American Persons. Global Perspective of Acute Kidney Injury: Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1