Kavita Mistry, Sagar Sadarangani, Daiana Moreno, Sherley M Mejia, Dennis G Moledina, Meghan E Sise
{"title":"Novel Biomarkers and Imaging Tests for AKI Diagnosis in Patients with Cancer.","authors":"Kavita Mistry, Sagar Sadarangani, Daiana Moreno, Sherley M Mejia, Dennis G Moledina, Meghan E Sise","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of non-invasive urine and blood-based biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cancer is an area of significant unmet clinical need. Traditional non-invasive diagnostic tools that are currently utilized in the clinic, such as creatinine and cystatin C-based eGFR measurements, urinalysis, urine sediment exam, urine protein quantification, and urine electrolyte measurement, lack the sensitivity and specificity to distinguish between the various underlying etiologies of AKI in patients with cancer. Imaging-based diagnostics can be helpful to rule out urinary obstruction, but also lack sensitivity and specificity to diagnose the etiology of AKI. Kidney biopsy is often required for definitive diagnosis. As our scientific understanding of the biological pathways that are dysregulated in AKI has advanced, there has been considerable interest in developing new biomarkers for AKI. For example, the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), which can occur in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), promises to be revolutionized by the incorporation of urinary testing for inflammatory biomarkers such as C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin 9 (IL-9). In the case of cisplatin administration, biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) may improve prognostication, differentiating between persistent AKI resulting from acute tubular injury versus pre-renal azotemia. The development and validation of blood, urine and imaging biomarkers into widely utilized diagnostic tests will require a concerted effort, but could improve diagnosis, management and prognostication for a growing group of patients who are at high risk of developing AKI during the course of their illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The lack of non-invasive urine and blood-based biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cancer is an area of significant unmet clinical need. Traditional non-invasive diagnostic tools that are currently utilized in the clinic, such as creatinine and cystatin C-based eGFR measurements, urinalysis, urine sediment exam, urine protein quantification, and urine electrolyte measurement, lack the sensitivity and specificity to distinguish between the various underlying etiologies of AKI in patients with cancer. Imaging-based diagnostics can be helpful to rule out urinary obstruction, but also lack sensitivity and specificity to diagnose the etiology of AKI. Kidney biopsy is often required for definitive diagnosis. As our scientific understanding of the biological pathways that are dysregulated in AKI has advanced, there has been considerable interest in developing new biomarkers for AKI. For example, the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), which can occur in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), promises to be revolutionized by the incorporation of urinary testing for inflammatory biomarkers such as C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin 9 (IL-9). In the case of cisplatin administration, biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) may improve prognostication, differentiating between persistent AKI resulting from acute tubular injury versus pre-renal azotemia. The development and validation of blood, urine and imaging biomarkers into widely utilized diagnostic tests will require a concerted effort, but could improve diagnosis, management and prognostication for a growing group of patients who are at high risk of developing AKI during the course of their illness.
缺乏诊断癌症患者急性肾损伤(AKI)的非侵入性尿液和血液生物标记物,这是一个尚未得到满足的重大临床需求领域。目前临床上使用的传统无创诊断工具,如基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的 eGFR 测量、尿液分析、尿沉渣检查、尿蛋白定量和尿电解质测量等,都缺乏敏感性和特异性,无法区分癌症患者 AKI 的各种潜在病因。影像诊断有助于排除尿路梗阻,但也缺乏诊断 AKI 病因的敏感性和特异性。通常需要进行肾活检才能明确诊断。随着我们对 AKI 中失调的生物通路的科学理解不断深入,人们对开发 AKI 的新生物标志物产生了浓厚的兴趣。例如,急性间质性肾炎(AIN)可能发生在接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的患者身上,通过对尿液中的炎症生物标记物(如 C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9)、肿瘤坏死因子α (TNF-α) 和白细胞介素 9 (IL-9))进行检测,有望彻底改变对这种疾病的诊断。在顺铂给药的情况下,中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质体(NGAL)和肾损伤分子 1(KIM-1)等生物标记物可改善预后,区分急性肾小管损伤导致的持续性 AKI 与肾前性氮质血症。将血液、尿液和成像生物标记物开发成广泛使用的诊断测试并进行验证需要多方共同努力,但对于越来越多在病程中极易发生 AKI 的患者来说,这可以改善诊断、管理和预后。