Systematic evaluation supports the use of ELISA for quantification of calprotectin in equine feces, a first step toward noninvasive quantification of intestinal inflammation in horses.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.04.0110
Rebecca C Bishop, Sarah M Graham, Sara L Connolly, Pamela A Wilkins, Annette M McCoy
{"title":"Systematic evaluation supports the use of ELISA for quantification of calprotectin in equine feces, a first step toward noninvasive quantification of intestinal inflammation in horses.","authors":"Rebecca C Bishop, Sarah M Graham, Sara L Connolly, Pamela A Wilkins, Annette M McCoy","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.04.0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To optimize and evaluate methods for the detection of the inflammatory biomarkers myeloperoxidase (MPO) and calprotectin (CP) in equine feces by ELISA.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Healthy horses (n = 28) and horses with intestinal inflammation (n = 10).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Feces were suspended in buffer to create fecal supernatant. Serum and fecal supernatant were analyzed using ELISA kits validated for the detection of MPO and CP in equine serum. Assay validation steps included intra- and interassay variability (coefficient of variation [CV]), dilution linearity, spike recovery, and sample type correlation. Variations in sample handling protocols (centrifugation speed, extraction buffer, and filtration) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 paired fecal and serum samples were used for initial analysis (10 healthy horses, 7 colitis). Previously reported sample handling protocols resulted in detectable MPO and CP but poor CV, linearity, and spike recovery. There was a linear correlation between serum and fecal samples for CP but not MPO. There was a significant difference between the concentration and CV of alternative sample handling protocols for CP and MPO, with improved CV for CP (2.1% to 18.6%) but not MPO (14.4% to 53.4%). Processing fresh feces with a fecal extraction buffer and filtration of supernatant resulted in the best CV (0.5% to 3.8%) and recovery (45% to 64%) for CP. Detection of MPO was inconsistent regardless of method.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>There are few reliable diagnostic modalities for inflammation of the equine large colon. Findings support quantification of CP in equine feces using the described ELISA kit and protocol. With additional study to establish reference interval and clinical utility, the fecal inflammatory biomarker CP may allow for noninvasive quantification of intestinal inflammation in horses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.04.0110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To optimize and evaluate methods for the detection of the inflammatory biomarkers myeloperoxidase (MPO) and calprotectin (CP) in equine feces by ELISA.

Animals: Healthy horses (n = 28) and horses with intestinal inflammation (n = 10).

Methods: Feces were suspended in buffer to create fecal supernatant. Serum and fecal supernatant were analyzed using ELISA kits validated for the detection of MPO and CP in equine serum. Assay validation steps included intra- and interassay variability (coefficient of variation [CV]), dilution linearity, spike recovery, and sample type correlation. Variations in sample handling protocols (centrifugation speed, extraction buffer, and filtration) were evaluated.

Results: 17 paired fecal and serum samples were used for initial analysis (10 healthy horses, 7 colitis). Previously reported sample handling protocols resulted in detectable MPO and CP but poor CV, linearity, and spike recovery. There was a linear correlation between serum and fecal samples for CP but not MPO. There was a significant difference between the concentration and CV of alternative sample handling protocols for CP and MPO, with improved CV for CP (2.1% to 18.6%) but not MPO (14.4% to 53.4%). Processing fresh feces with a fecal extraction buffer and filtration of supernatant resulted in the best CV (0.5% to 3.8%) and recovery (45% to 64%) for CP. Detection of MPO was inconsistent regardless of method.

Clinical relevance: There are few reliable diagnostic modalities for inflammation of the equine large colon. Findings support quantification of CP in equine feces using the described ELISA kit and protocol. With additional study to establish reference interval and clinical utility, the fecal inflammatory biomarker CP may allow for noninvasive quantification of intestinal inflammation in horses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统评估支持使用酶联免疫吸附法对马粪便中的钙粘蛋白进行定量,这是对马肠道炎症进行无创定量的第一步。
目的动物: 健康马(n = 28)和患有肠道炎症的马(n = 10):方法:将粪便悬浮在缓冲液中,制成粪便上清液。使用经过验证的 ELISA 试剂盒分析血清和粪便上清液,以检测马血清中的 MPO 和 CP。测定验证步骤包括测定内和测定间变异性(变异系数 [CV])、稀释线性、加标回收率和样品类型相关性。对样品处理方案(离心速度、提取缓冲液和过滤)的变化进行了评估:初步分析使用了 17 份成对的粪便和血清样本(10 份健康马,7 份结肠炎马)。之前报告的样本处理方案可检测到 MPO 和 CP,但 CV、线性度和峰值回收率较差。血清样本和粪便样本中的氯化石蜡呈线性相关,但 MPO 不相关。其他样本处理方案在氯化石蜡和 MPO 的浓度和 CV 方面存在明显差异,氯化石蜡的 CV 有所提高(从 2.1% 到 18.6%),而 MPO 的 CV 则没有提高(从 14.4% 到 53.4%)。用粪便提取缓冲液处理新鲜粪便并过滤上清液可使 CP 的 CV 值(0.5%-3.8%)和回收率(45%-64%)达到最佳。无论采用哪种方法,MPO 的检测结果都不一致:临床意义:马大肠炎症几乎没有可靠的诊断方法。研究结果支持使用所述 ELISA 试剂盒和方案对马粪便中的 CP 进行定量检测。通过进一步研究以确定参考区间和临床实用性,粪便炎症生物标志物 CP 可以对马的肠道炎症进行无创量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Effect of repeated steam sterilizations on insertional torque, torque to failure, and axial pullout strength of 3.5-mm and 2.0-mm cortical bone screws. Mineralization of equine proximal sesamoid bones precedes articular cartilage and fibrocartilaginous enthesis maturation in early postgestational development. Echocardiographic evaluation in koi carp (Cyprinus carpio) under manual restraint compared to anesthesia with isoeugenol. Rectus sheath block results in greater cranial-caudal spread whereas transversus abdominis plane block results in greater lateral spread as assessed by computed tomography in dogs. A review of the current standing of microRNA expression in canine urothelial carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1