Rectus sheath block results in greater cranial-caudal spread whereas transversus abdominis plane block results in greater lateral spread as assessed by computed tomography in dogs.
William Emmett Swanton, Neil Christensen, Carrie Schroeder
{"title":"Rectus sheath block results in greater cranial-caudal spread whereas transversus abdominis plane block results in greater lateral spread as assessed by computed tomography in dogs.","authors":"William Emmett Swanton, Neil Christensen, Carrie Schroeder","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.04.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the in vivo spread of iodinated contrast following injections in the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath in anesthetized dogs via computed tomography. Secondarily, the time of performing each block was compared.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>6 adult, purpose-bred Beagles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective crossover study, dogs were administered injections either in the rectus sheath or transversus abdominis fascial plane in the same manner as a rectus sheath block (RSB) or TAP block using dilute iodinated contrast. Computed tomography scans were performed immediately following injection (time [T]-0) and at 3, 9, 18, and 30 minutes postinjection. Data regarding the spread in the cranial-caudal and lateral directions and time to perform the injections were compared between the 2 techniques using paired or 2-sample t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significantly greater spread in the cranial-caudal direction in the RSB group (62.9 ± 6.4 mm vs 54.8 ± 6.8 mm at T30; P = .009), whereas spread in the lateral direction was greater in the TAP group (37.3 ± 3.0 mm vs 48.6 ± 6.1 mm at T30; P < .0001). The RSB injection was performed in a more time-efficient manner than TAP injection (48.2 ± 3.2 seconds vs 82.3 ± 8.7 seconds; P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In living subjects, RSB injections resulted in greater cranial-caudal spread while TAP injections resulted in greater lateral spread. Rectus sheath block injections were performed in a more time efficient manner compared to a single point TAP injection in anesthetized dogs.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The RSB was performed in a more time-efficient manner and would likely result in greater coverage of the ventral midline. The TAP block would likely result in more significant regional anesthetic coverage of the lateral abdominal wall. Further studies are required to determine the degree of the clinical significance of these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.04.0106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the in vivo spread of iodinated contrast following injections in the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath in anesthetized dogs via computed tomography. Secondarily, the time of performing each block was compared.
Animals: 6 adult, purpose-bred Beagles.
Methods: In a prospective crossover study, dogs were administered injections either in the rectus sheath or transversus abdominis fascial plane in the same manner as a rectus sheath block (RSB) or TAP block using dilute iodinated contrast. Computed tomography scans were performed immediately following injection (time [T]-0) and at 3, 9, 18, and 30 minutes postinjection. Data regarding the spread in the cranial-caudal and lateral directions and time to perform the injections were compared between the 2 techniques using paired or 2-sample t tests.
Results: There was significantly greater spread in the cranial-caudal direction in the RSB group (62.9 ± 6.4 mm vs 54.8 ± 6.8 mm at T30; P = .009), whereas spread in the lateral direction was greater in the TAP group (37.3 ± 3.0 mm vs 48.6 ± 6.1 mm at T30; P < .0001). The RSB injection was performed in a more time-efficient manner than TAP injection (48.2 ± 3.2 seconds vs 82.3 ± 8.7 seconds; P = .03).
Conclusions: In living subjects, RSB injections resulted in greater cranial-caudal spread while TAP injections resulted in greater lateral spread. Rectus sheath block injections were performed in a more time efficient manner compared to a single point TAP injection in anesthetized dogs.
Clinical relevance: The RSB was performed in a more time-efficient manner and would likely result in greater coverage of the ventral midline. The TAP block would likely result in more significant regional anesthetic coverage of the lateral abdominal wall. Further studies are required to determine the degree of the clinical significance of these results.
期刊介绍：
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
