Effectiveness of a Structured Disaster Management Training Program on Nurses’ Disaster Readiness for Response to Emergencies and Disasters: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-07-07 DOI:10.1155/2024/5551894
Chia-Huei Lin, Wen-Chii Tzeng, Li-Chi Chiang, Min-Chin Lu, Meei-Shyuan Lee, Shang-Lin Chiang
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Structured Disaster Management Training Program on Nurses’ Disaster Readiness for Response to Emergencies and Disasters: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Chia-Huei Lin,&nbsp;Wen-Chii Tzeng,&nbsp;Li-Chi Chiang,&nbsp;Min-Chin Lu,&nbsp;Meei-Shyuan Lee,&nbsp;Shang-Lin Chiang","doi":"10.1155/2024/5551894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Most frontline nurses lack sufficient readiness for effective disaster response. Therefore, designing a disaster management training program (DMTP) to promote nurses’ readiness for disaster response is imperative. <i>Aim</i>. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured DMTP on nurses’ readiness for response to disasters. <i>Methods</i>. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. One hundred eligible nurses, recruited using convenience sampling from a medical centre in northern Taiwan, were randomly assigned to either the experimental (EG, <i>n</i> = 50) or control (CG, <i>n</i> = 50) group. Both groups received regular continuous nursing education. The EG received an extra two-day (16 h) structured DMTP delivered by transdisciplinary collaborations through multiple teaching strategies (lectures, simulations, problem-solving lessons, demonstrations, tabletop exercises, discussions, group presentations, and reflections). Readiness for disaster response, consisting of four subscales (emergency response, clinical management, self-protection, and personal preparation), was assessed at baseline and 12 weeks after the intervention. Generalized estimating equations were used as the primary method of data analyses to evaluate the intervention effects. <i>Results</i>. Ninety-four nurses (94%) completed the study, and 100 nurses were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. While participants in the EG had increased readiness for disaster response after training and at the 12-week follow-up, those in the CG exhibited no differences between baseline and 12-week follow-up. When the group × time interaction was examined, the EG had a greater increase in readiness for disaster response and its four domains, including emergency response, clinical management, self-protection, and personal preparedness after 12 weeks, than the CG. <i>Conclusion</i>. A two-day structured DMTP utilizing multiple teaching strategies through transdisciplinary collaborations is recommended to enhance hospital nurses’ readiness for disaster response. <i>Implications for Nursing Management</i>. Nursing leaders should consider incorporating such a structured DMTP into ongoing nursing training as a critical component of professional development programs, thereby strengthening nurses’ disaster readiness in hospital settings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5551894","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5551894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Most frontline nurses lack sufficient readiness for effective disaster response. Therefore, designing a disaster management training program (DMTP) to promote nurses’ readiness for disaster response is imperative. Aim. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured DMTP on nurses’ readiness for response to disasters. Methods. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. One hundred eligible nurses, recruited using convenience sampling from a medical centre in northern Taiwan, were randomly assigned to either the experimental (EG, n = 50) or control (CG, n = 50) group. Both groups received regular continuous nursing education. The EG received an extra two-day (16 h) structured DMTP delivered by transdisciplinary collaborations through multiple teaching strategies (lectures, simulations, problem-solving lessons, demonstrations, tabletop exercises, discussions, group presentations, and reflections). Readiness for disaster response, consisting of four subscales (emergency response, clinical management, self-protection, and personal preparation), was assessed at baseline and 12 weeks after the intervention. Generalized estimating equations were used as the primary method of data analyses to evaluate the intervention effects. Results. Ninety-four nurses (94%) completed the study, and 100 nurses were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. While participants in the EG had increased readiness for disaster response after training and at the 12-week follow-up, those in the CG exhibited no differences between baseline and 12-week follow-up. When the group × time interaction was examined, the EG had a greater increase in readiness for disaster response and its four domains, including emergency response, clinical management, self-protection, and personal preparedness after 12 weeks, than the CG. Conclusion. A two-day structured DMTP utilizing multiple teaching strategies through transdisciplinary collaborations is recommended to enhance hospital nurses’ readiness for disaster response. Implications for Nursing Management. Nursing leaders should consider incorporating such a structured DMTP into ongoing nursing training as a critical component of professional development programs, thereby strengthening nurses’ disaster readiness in hospital settings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构化灾难管理培训课程对护士应对紧急情况和灾难的灾难准备的效果:随机对照试验
背景。大多数一线护士缺乏有效救灾的充分准备。因此,设计一项灾害管理培训计划(DMTP)以促进护士做好应对灾害的准备势在必行。研究目的本研究旨在评估结构化 DMTP 对护士做好灾害响应准备的有效性。方法:随机对照试验。进行了一项随机对照试验。从台湾北部的一家医疗中心以便利抽样的方式招募了 100 名符合条件的护士,并将其随机分配到实验组(EG,n = 50)或对照组(CG,n = 50)。两组均接受常规的持续护理教育。实验组接受为期两天(16 小时)的结构化 DMTP,由跨学科合作通过多种教学策略(讲座、模拟、问题解决课程、演示、桌面练习、讨论、小组展示和反思)进行授课。灾难应对准备情况包括四个分量表(应急反应、临床管理、自我保护和个人准备),分别在基线和干预 12 周后进行评估。数据分析的主要方法是使用广义估计方程来评估干预效果。结果94 名护士(94%)完成了研究,100 名护士被纳入意向治疗分析。EG 组的参与者在培训后和 12 周的随访中提高了灾难应对准备度,而 CG 组的参与者在基线和 12 周的随访中没有表现出差异。当研究组×时间交互作用时,12 周后,EG 比 CG 在灾难应对准备及其四个领域(包括应急响应、临床管理、自我保护和个人准备)的提高幅度更大。结论建议通过跨学科合作,利用多种教学策略开展为期两天的结构化 DMTP,以提高医院护士的灾难应对准备水平。对护理管理的启示。护理领导者应考虑将这种结构化的 DMTP 纳入持续的护理培训中,作为专业发展计划的重要组成部分,从而加强医院护士的灾难应对准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: An Interprofessional Approach With Undergraduate Medicine and Nursing Students Using Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES)—A Qualitative Study Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support, Work Well-Being, and Medical Narrative Ability Among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire to Assess Attitudes Towards Invisible Gender-Based Violence (Q-AIGV) Advanced Clinical Practitioners’ Resilience and Emotional and Spiritual Well-Being During COVID-19 Educational Advices for New-Graduate Nurse on Social Media in China: A Grounded Theory Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1