Efficacy and Safety of Re-Challenging PD-1 Inhibitors in Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Previously Treated with Chemotherapy and PD-1 Inhibitors

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.2147/cmar.s460716
Weixin Bei, Shuhui Dong, Guoying Liu, Lanfeng Lin, Yaofei Jiang, Nian Lu, Wangzhong Li, Hu Liang, Yanqun Xiang, Weixiong Xia
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Re-Challenging PD-1 Inhibitors in Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Previously Treated with Chemotherapy and PD-1 Inhibitors","authors":"Weixin Bei, Shuhui Dong, Guoying Liu, Lanfeng Lin, Yaofei Jiang, Nian Lu, Wangzhong Li, Hu Liang, Yanqun Xiang, Weixiong Xia","doi":"10.2147/cmar.s460716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who have progressed on prior anti-PD1 therapy.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> We enrolled patients with mNPC who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapy alone after prior progression of anti-PD1 therapy. The primary endpoint was progress-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR).<br/><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 96 patients were eligible between January 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-seven (38.5%) were in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group, while the remaining 59 patients (61.5%) were in the chemotherapy group. The ORR and DCR of PD-1 ICIs group and chemotherapy group were 37.8% vs 23.7% and 86.5% vs.74.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 21.1 months (IQR 16.1– 28.7), the log-rank analysis demonstrated a significantly improved PFS in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group compared to the chemotherapy group (8.4 months [95% CI 4.3– 14.0] vs 5.0 months [95% CI 2.8– 7.2], <em>P =</em> 0.03). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (28.3 vs 24.1 months, <em>P =</em> 0.09). The two groups had similar adverse reactions, but the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group (18.9% vs 3.4%, <em>P =</em> 0.025).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> mNPC patients who progressed from prior anti-PD1 therapy could benefit from the anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy. However, further validation is needed.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s460716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who have progressed on prior anti-PD1 therapy.
Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients with mNPC who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapy alone after prior progression of anti-PD1 therapy. The primary endpoint was progress-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR).
Results: A total of 96 patients were eligible between January 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-seven (38.5%) were in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group, while the remaining 59 patients (61.5%) were in the chemotherapy group. The ORR and DCR of PD-1 ICIs group and chemotherapy group were 37.8% vs 23.7% and 86.5% vs.74.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 21.1 months (IQR 16.1– 28.7), the log-rank analysis demonstrated a significantly improved PFS in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group compared to the chemotherapy group (8.4 months [95% CI 4.3– 14.0] vs 5.0 months [95% CI 2.8– 7.2], P = 0.03). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (28.3 vs 24.1 months, P = 0.09). The two groups had similar adverse reactions, but the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group (18.9% vs 3.4%, P = 0.025).
Conclusion: mNPC patients who progressed from prior anti-PD1 therapy could benefit from the anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy. However, further validation is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在既往接受过化疗和 PD-1 抑制剂治疗的转移性鼻咽癌的二线治疗中再次挑战 PD-1 抑制剂的有效性和安全性
研究背景我们旨在评估抗PD1再挑战联合化疗对既往抗PD1治疗进展的转移性鼻咽癌(mNPC)患者的疗效和安全性:我们招募了接受化疗联合PD-1免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)或单独化疗的mNPC患者。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、疾病控制率(DCR)和客观反应率(ORR):2015年1月至2020年12月期间,共有96名患者符合条件。PD-1 ICIs再挑战组有37人(38.5%),其余59人(61.5%)为化疗组。PD-1 ICIs组和化疗组的ORR和DCR分别为37.8% vs 23.7%和86.5% vs.74.5%。中位随访期为21.1个月(IQR 16.1- 28.7),对数秩分析显示,与化疗组相比,PD-1 ICIs再挑战组的PFS显著改善(8.4个月 [95% CI 4.3- 14.0] vs 5.0个月 [95% CI 2.8- 7.2],P = 0.03)。不过,两组患者的 OS 无明显差异(28.3 个月 vs 24.1 个月,P = 0.09)。两组患者的不良反应相似,但PD-1 ICIs再挑战组的3级或4级血小板减少发生率明显更高(18.9% vs 3.4%,P = 0.025)。然而,还需要进一步的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Sociodemographic Factors and Clinical Aspects on the Quality of Life of Surgically Treated Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Mixed Medullary-Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma with Mixed Lymph Node Metastases: a Case Report and Review of the Literature. Integrating PARP Inhibitors in mCRPC Therapy: Current Strategies and Emerging Trends Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Mortality in Female Breast Cancer Patients Considering Lifestyle Factors Ultrasound Diagnosis of Bilateral Primary Breast Burkitt Lymphoma in a 28-Year-Old Lactating Patient: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1