Future changes in the vertical structure of severe convective storm environments over the U.S. central Great Plains

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Climate Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1175/jcli-d-23-0141.1
Isaac Davis, Funing Li, Daniel R. Chavas
{"title":"Future changes in the vertical structure of severe convective storm environments over the U.S. central Great Plains","authors":"Isaac Davis, Funing Li, Daniel R. Chavas","doi":"10.1175/jcli-d-23-0141.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The effect of warming on severe convective storm potential is commonly explained in terms of changes in vertically-integrated (“bulk”) environmental parameters, such as CAPE and 0–6-km shear. However, such events are known to depend on details of the vertical structure of the thermodynamic and kinematic environment that can change independently of these bulk parameters. This work examines how warming may affect the complete vertical structure of these environments for fixed ranges of values of high CAPE and bulk shear, using data over the central Great Plains from two high-performing climate models (CNRM and MPI). To first order, projected changes in the vertical sounding structure is consistent between the two models: the environment warms approximately uniformly with height at constant relative humidity and the shear profile remains relatively constant. The boundary layer becomes slightly drier (−2–6% relative humidity) while the free troposphere becomes slightly moister (+1–3%), with a slight increase in moist static energy deficit aloft with stronger magnitude in CNRM. CNRM indicates enhanced low-level shear and storm-relative helicity associated with stronger hodograph curvature in the lowest 2 km, whereas MPI shows near zero change. Both models strongly underestimate shear below 1 km compared to ERA5, indicating large uncertainty in projecting subtle changes in the low-level flow structure in climate models. Evaluation of the net effect of these modest thermodynamic and kinematic changes on severe convective storm outcomes cannot be ascertained here but could be explored in simulation experiments.","PeriodicalId":15472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Climate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Climate","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-23-0141.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The effect of warming on severe convective storm potential is commonly explained in terms of changes in vertically-integrated (“bulk”) environmental parameters, such as CAPE and 0–6-km shear. However, such events are known to depend on details of the vertical structure of the thermodynamic and kinematic environment that can change independently of these bulk parameters. This work examines how warming may affect the complete vertical structure of these environments for fixed ranges of values of high CAPE and bulk shear, using data over the central Great Plains from two high-performing climate models (CNRM and MPI). To first order, projected changes in the vertical sounding structure is consistent between the two models: the environment warms approximately uniformly with height at constant relative humidity and the shear profile remains relatively constant. The boundary layer becomes slightly drier (−2–6% relative humidity) while the free troposphere becomes slightly moister (+1–3%), with a slight increase in moist static energy deficit aloft with stronger magnitude in CNRM. CNRM indicates enhanced low-level shear and storm-relative helicity associated with stronger hodograph curvature in the lowest 2 km, whereas MPI shows near zero change. Both models strongly underestimate shear below 1 km compared to ERA5, indicating large uncertainty in projecting subtle changes in the low-level flow structure in climate models. Evaluation of the net effect of these modest thermodynamic and kinematic changes on severe convective storm outcomes cannot be ascertained here but could be explored in simulation experiments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国中部大平原强对流风暴环境垂直结构的未来变化
摘要 暖化对强对流风暴潜势的影响通常用垂直整合("总体")环境参数的变化来解释,例如 CAPE 和 0-6 公里切变。然而,众所周知,此类事件取决于热力学和运动学环境垂直结构的细节,而这些细节的变化可能与这些总体参数无关。这项工作利用两个高性能气候模式(CNRM 和 MPI)在大平原中部的数据,研究了在高 CAPE 和体切变的固定值范围内,气候变暖会如何影响这些环境的完整垂直结构。首先,两个模式对垂直探测结构变化的预测是一致的:在相对湿度不变的情况下,环境随着高度的增加而变暖,切变剖面保持相对不变。边界层略微变干(相对湿度-2-6%),而自由对流层略微变湿(+1-3%),高空湿静态能量不足略有增加,在中国气象局模式下幅度更大。CNRM 显示低空切变和风暴相关卷流增强,与最低 2 公里处更强的霍多图曲率有关,而 MPI 显示变化几乎为零。与ERA5相比,两个模式都严重低估了1公里以下的切变,这表明气候模式预测低空气流结构的微妙变化存在很大的不确定性。这里无法确定这些适度的热力学和运动学变化对强对流风暴结果的净影响,但可以在模拟实验中进行探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
490
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Climate (JCLI) (ISSN: 0894-8755; eISSN: 1520-0442) publishes research that advances basic understanding of the dynamics and physics of the climate system on large spatial scales, including variability of the atmosphere, oceans, land surface, and cryosphere; past, present, and projected future changes in the climate system; and climate simulation and prediction.
期刊最新文献
Changes of the SST seasonal cycle in a warmer North Pacific without ocean dynamical feedbacks Cross-time scale analysis of year-round atmospheric circulation patterns and their impacts on rainfall and temperatures in the Iberian Peninsula Clusters of Regional Precipitation Seasonality Change in the Community Earth System Model version 2 Reduced Indian Ocean Dipole Asymmetry and Increased Extreme Negative Events under Future Greenhouse Warming Multidecadal variability from ocean to atmosphere in the North Atlantic: Perturbation potential energy as the bridge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1