Functional distribution, personal income inequality, and top shares of income: do social classes still matter?

Luca Giangregorio, Davide Villani
{"title":"Functional distribution, personal income inequality, and top shares of income: do social classes still matter?","authors":"Luca Giangregorio, Davide Villani","doi":"10.1007/s10888-024-09633-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper aims at providing new evidence about the link between personal and functional distribution and top-shares composition. We apply a novel class scheme based on two key features of contemporary capitalism i.e., individuals/households receiving multiple types of incomes, and the role of managers. The empirical application in Germany, Spain, and Italy over the period 2000–2017 reveals two main results. First, we observe a direct link between personal and functional distributions. A marginal increase in wages received by labourers would reduce inequality, whereas those received by capitalist households would increase it. Second, we find that a significant portion of labour income at the top of the income distribution corresponds to wages received by capitalist households. We conclude that although the linear correspondence between income source and class location is more blurred today than it was 200 years ago, a class divide is still clear and more prominent than what is often indicated in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":501277,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Economic Inequality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Economic Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-024-09633-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims at providing new evidence about the link between personal and functional distribution and top-shares composition. We apply a novel class scheme based on two key features of contemporary capitalism i.e., individuals/households receiving multiple types of incomes, and the role of managers. The empirical application in Germany, Spain, and Italy over the period 2000–2017 reveals two main results. First, we observe a direct link between personal and functional distributions. A marginal increase in wages received by labourers would reduce inequality, whereas those received by capitalist households would increase it. Second, we find that a significant portion of labour income at the top of the income distribution corresponds to wages received by capitalist households. We conclude that although the linear correspondence between income source and class location is more blurred today than it was 200 years ago, a class divide is still clear and more prominent than what is often indicated in the literature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能分配、个人收入不平等和最高收入份额:社会阶层是否仍然重要?
本文旨在为个人和职能分配与顶层股份构成之间的联系提供新的证据。我们根据当代资本主义的两个主要特征,即获得多种类型收入的个人/家庭以及经理人的作用,采用了一种新颖的分类方法。2000-2017 年间在德国、西班牙和意大利的实证应用揭示了两个主要结果。首先,我们观察到个人分配与职能分配之间存在直接联系。劳动者工资的边际增长会减少不平等,而资本家家庭的工资则会增加不平等。其次,我们发现在收入分配的顶端,劳动收入的很大一部分与资本家家庭获得的工资相对应。我们的结论是,尽管收入来源与阶级位置之间的线性对应关系在今天比 200 年前更加模糊,但阶级鸿沟依然明显,而且比文献中经常提到的更加突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social gradients in employment during and after the COVID-19 pandemic The long and the short of it: inheritance and wealth in Ireland When perception shapes reality: Effects of perceived income inequality and social mobility on affective polarization Central bank independence, income inequality and poverty: What do the data say? Wealth at birth and its effect on child academic achievement and behavioral problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1