Opening Access but Concealing Contact: A First Study of Over-The-Counter Hearing Aid Consumer-Facing Communications.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2375146
Sara Champlin, Sharon Miller, Abigail Griffith, Ariel Hatley, Candice Reed, Erin Schafer
{"title":"Opening Access but Concealing Contact: A First Study of Over-The-Counter Hearing Aid Consumer-Facing Communications.","authors":"Sara Champlin, Sharon Miller, Abigail Griffith, Ariel Hatley, Candice Reed, Erin Schafer","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2375146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing loss is a prevalent chronic health condition with approximately 40 million Americans living with mild to moderate hearing loss. Yet, only about 20% will ever pursue hearing interventions. To broaden uptake the FDA approved over the counter (OTC) hearing aid (HA) options in October 2022. A stigmatized health topic, it is both necessary and well-timed to explore how HAs are depicted in consumer-facing communications, which has not been formally studied to date. The present study examines social media posts across a one-year time frame (six months prior and six months following the FDA announcement) from the three most-followed OTC HA brands. With the shift to OTC, HA companies are responsible for communicating directly with consumers. Through the lens of Contact Theory, we explore three mechanisms by which these messages enact stigma, through contact with (1) people, (2) HA products, and (3) a larger brand community. Overall, only 22% of posts discussed OTC in any capacity. Contact was similarly limited, with only 9% of posts showing a person wearing an HA. However, following the FDA announcement, the number of posts depicting people or social relationships doubled (23% to 58% and 13% to 36%, respectively). To overcome stigma and increase uptake of these essential health products, it is important to promote contact with hearing aids and those who wear them. Timely implications for health communication research and practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2375146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hearing loss is a prevalent chronic health condition with approximately 40 million Americans living with mild to moderate hearing loss. Yet, only about 20% will ever pursue hearing interventions. To broaden uptake the FDA approved over the counter (OTC) hearing aid (HA) options in October 2022. A stigmatized health topic, it is both necessary and well-timed to explore how HAs are depicted in consumer-facing communications, which has not been formally studied to date. The present study examines social media posts across a one-year time frame (six months prior and six months following the FDA announcement) from the three most-followed OTC HA brands. With the shift to OTC, HA companies are responsible for communicating directly with consumers. Through the lens of Contact Theory, we explore three mechanisms by which these messages enact stigma, through contact with (1) people, (2) HA products, and (3) a larger brand community. Overall, only 22% of posts discussed OTC in any capacity. Contact was similarly limited, with only 9% of posts showing a person wearing an HA. However, following the FDA announcement, the number of posts depicting people or social relationships doubled (23% to 58% and 13% to 36%, respectively). To overcome stigma and increase uptake of these essential health products, it is important to promote contact with hearing aids and those who wear them. Timely implications for health communication research and practice are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打开通道,隐藏接触:首次研究面向消费者的非处方助听器传播。
听力损失是一种普遍存在的慢性健康问题,约有 4000 万美国人患有轻度至中度听力损失。然而,只有约 20% 的人愿意接受听力干预。为了扩大听力损失的治疗范围,美国食品和药物管理局于 2022 年 10 月批准了非处方(OTC)助听器(HA)的选择。助听器是一个被污名化的健康话题,因此探讨如何在面向消费者的传播中描述助听器既有必要,也恰逢其时。本研究对三个最受关注的非处方药 HA 品牌在社交媒体上发布的帖子进行了为期一年(FDA 公告发布前六个月和发布后六个月)的研究。随着向非处方药的转变,HA 公司有责任直接与消费者沟通。通过 "接触理论"(Contact Theory)的视角,我们探讨了这些信息通过与(1)人、(2)HA 产品和(3)更大的品牌社区接触而形成污名的三种机制。总体而言,只有 22% 的帖子以任何形式讨论了非处方药。接触也同样有限,只有 9% 的帖子展示了佩戴 HA 的人。然而,在食品及药物管理局发布公告后,描述人物或社会关系的帖子数量翻了一番(分别从 23% 增加到 58%,从 13% 增加到 36%)。为了克服耻辱感并提高这些基本保健产品的使用率,促进人们接触助听器和佩戴助听器的人非常重要。本文讨论了健康传播研究和实践的适时意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
When Fears Come True: An Experimental Approximation of Patient Comprehension During Initial Cancer Diagnoses. Mobile Patient-Provider Communication and Lifestyle Improvement: Examining the Role of Mobile Technology Identity and Health Empowerment. The Effect of Social Media Influencer Warranting Cues on Intentions to Use Non-Hormonal Contraception. Health-Related Communication of Social Media Influencers: A Scoping Review. Discourse Analysis in End-of-Life Communication: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1