Contingencies of a leadership symmetric dyad cooperation: the case of the co-CEOs

IF 4.2 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Leadership & Organization Development Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1108/lodj-04-2023-0188
Moshe Banai, Philip Tulimieri
{"title":"Contingencies of a leadership symmetric dyad cooperation: the case of the co-CEOs","authors":"Moshe Banai, Philip Tulimieri","doi":"10.1108/lodj-04-2023-0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study uses social exchange theory to describe, explain and propose the influence of dyad partners' leadership position structure, which includes the roles they play and their existing and prospective common experience, on their commitment to their dyad and their cooperation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study uses the case of equally empowered co-CEOs in a family business, who play the roles of family member, owner and executive; co-CEOs in a startup firm, who play the roles of owner and executive; and co-CEOs in a merger and acquisition (M&amp;A), who play the role of executive. Co-CEOs in family businesses benefit from longer existing and longer prospective dyad longevity than co-CEOs in startups, who, in turn, benefit from longer existing and longer prospective dyad longevity than co-CEOs in M&amp;As.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study proposes that the roles the partners play in the dyads, and the existing and prospective longevity of their relationship, positively influence the partners' commitment to the dyad and their level of cooperation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study offers a model that has the potential to direct scholars at the formulation of the theory of top management symmetric formal power dyads dynamics and assist family business owners, startup partners, board of directors and co-CEOs in formulating and implementing upper echelons leadership plans to enhance cooperation and coordination between equal partners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48033,"journal":{"name":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-04-2023-0188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study uses social exchange theory to describe, explain and propose the influence of dyad partners' leadership position structure, which includes the roles they play and their existing and prospective common experience, on their commitment to their dyad and their cooperation.

Design/methodology/approach

The study uses the case of equally empowered co-CEOs in a family business, who play the roles of family member, owner and executive; co-CEOs in a startup firm, who play the roles of owner and executive; and co-CEOs in a merger and acquisition (M&A), who play the role of executive. Co-CEOs in family businesses benefit from longer existing and longer prospective dyad longevity than co-CEOs in startups, who, in turn, benefit from longer existing and longer prospective dyad longevity than co-CEOs in M&As.

Findings

The study proposes that the roles the partners play in the dyads, and the existing and prospective longevity of their relationship, positively influence the partners' commitment to the dyad and their level of cooperation.

Originality/value

The study offers a model that has the potential to direct scholars at the formulation of the theory of top management symmetric formal power dyads dynamics and assist family business owners, startup partners, board of directors and co-CEOs in formulating and implementing upper echelons leadership plans to enhance cooperation and coordination between equal partners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领导层对称二元合作的权宜之计:联合首席执行官的案例
研究目的本研究运用社会交换理论来描述、解释并提出合作关系伙伴的领导职位结构(包括他们所扮演的角色以及他们现有的和未来的共同经验)对他们对合作关系的承诺和合作的影响。设计/方法/途径 本研究以家族企业中拥有同等权力的联合首席执行官为案例,他们分别扮演着家族成员、所有者和高管的角色;以创业公司中的联合首席执行官为案例,他们分别扮演着所有者和高管的角色;以并购(M&A)中的联合首席执行官为案例,他们分别扮演着高管的角色。与初创企业的联合首席执行官相比,家族企业的联合首席执行官受益于现有和未来更长的合作关系寿命,而与并购企业的联合首席执行官相比,家族企业的联合首席执行官受益于现有和未来更长的合作关系寿命。原创性/价值本研究提供了一个模型,有可能指导学者们制定高层管理对称正式权力二元动态理论,并帮助家族企业所有者、创业合伙人、董事会和联合首席执行官制定和实施高层领导计划,以加强平等伙伴之间的合作与协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The journal addresses a broad range of topics which are relevant to organizations and reflective of societal developments. Public and private sector organizations alike face ongoing pressure to streamline activities, improve efficiency and achieve demanding organizational objectives. In this context, the ability of senior managers to understand the culture and dynamics of organizations and to deliver strong leadership during periods of change, could be the difference between organizational failure and success.
期刊最新文献
Leader generosity and employee knowledge sharing: an episodic perspective of generalized reciprocity Organizational citizenship behavior to the environment at medical device firms: the intersection of leadership characteristics, organizational factors and employee behaviors Workplace diversity and positive leadership style: impacts on employee well-being in Australian businesses Interplay of paradoxical virtual leadership and psychological contract violation – impact on organizational citizenship behavior Intuiting or rationalising self-other agreement in leadership?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1