Identifying, Rating, and Categorizing Elements of Systems Thinking in Chemistry Education

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01070
Tejas Gill, Brett McCollum
{"title":"Identifying, Rating, and Categorizing Elements of Systems Thinking in Chemistry Education","authors":"Tejas Gill, Brett McCollum","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chemistry education community has made considerable progress developing a foundation for chemistry educators to begin infusing a systems thinking approach into their course design. As researchers and practitioners seek to explore possibilities from systems thinking in chemistry education, an understanding of the range of strategies and motivations is needed. Herein, we report on a four-stage process for identifying and classifying elements of systems thinking in chemistry education. First: A systematic review of the literature on systems thinking in chemistry education was used to identify systems thinking elements in peer-reviewed published works. Second: We thematically clustered these elements. This resulted in three categories based on what system thinking techniques are being taught, how they are being taught, and why they are being taught. Third: We collected questionnaire responses from published scholars on systems thinking in chemistry education to assess how scholars rate the requirement of the elements. Fourth: We asked questionnaire participants to categorize the systems thinking elements using the framework that emerged from our thematic clustering. We found that 90% of participants agreed that 14 of the 34 elements are required for the effective implementation of a systems thinking approach in chemistry education. Notably, participants did not report a clear delineation between the “what”, “how”, and “why” for some elements. Together, the findings in this manuscript highlight areas of agreement and uncertainty for the implementation of systems thinking in chemistry education.","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chemistry education community has made considerable progress developing a foundation for chemistry educators to begin infusing a systems thinking approach into their course design. As researchers and practitioners seek to explore possibilities from systems thinking in chemistry education, an understanding of the range of strategies and motivations is needed. Herein, we report on a four-stage process for identifying and classifying elements of systems thinking in chemistry education. First: A systematic review of the literature on systems thinking in chemistry education was used to identify systems thinking elements in peer-reviewed published works. Second: We thematically clustered these elements. This resulted in three categories based on what system thinking techniques are being taught, how they are being taught, and why they are being taught. Third: We collected questionnaire responses from published scholars on systems thinking in chemistry education to assess how scholars rate the requirement of the elements. Fourth: We asked questionnaire participants to categorize the systems thinking elements using the framework that emerged from our thematic clustering. We found that 90% of participants agreed that 14 of the 34 elements are required for the effective implementation of a systems thinking approach in chemistry education. Notably, participants did not report a clear delineation between the “what”, “how”, and “why” for some elements. Together, the findings in this manuscript highlight areas of agreement and uncertainty for the implementation of systems thinking in chemistry education.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化学教育中系统思维要素的识别、评级和分类
化学教育界在为化学教育工作者在课程设计中渗透系统思维方法奠定基础方面取得 了长足的进步。随着研究者和实践者努力探索系统思维在化学教育中的可能性,我们需要了解各种策略和动机。在此,我们报告了在化学教育中识别和分类系统思维要素的四个阶段过程。第一阶段对有关化学教育中的系统思维的文献进行系统回顾,在同行评议的已发表作品中确定系统思维要素。其次:我们对这些要素进行了专题分组。根据系统思维技术的教学内容、教学方式和教学原因,我们将其分为三类。第三:我们收集了已发表的有关化学教育中的系统思维的学者的问卷答复,以评估学者们如何评价这些要素的要求。第四:我们要求问卷参与者使用我们的主题聚类产生的框架对系统思维要素进行分类。我们发现,90% 的参与者同意,在化学教育中有效实施系统思维方法需要具备 34 个要素中的 14 个。值得注意的是,对于某些要素,参与者并没有对 "是什么"、"怎么做 "和 "为什么 "进行明确划分。总之,本手稿中的研究结果突出了在化学教育中实施系统思维的共识和不确定领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
期刊最新文献
Transforming Student Interactions with Flipped Content from an Isolated, Passive Activity into a Collaborative and Engaging Endeavor A Digital and Interactive Tool to Learn 1H NMR Spectroscopy: The SpinDrops Learning Environment Evolution of a Biocatalysis CURE for Organic Chemistry Students Analyzing the Impact of Time Spent on Practice Questions on General Chemistry Students’ Problem-Solving Performance Metal-Free Ring-Opening Polymerization of Propylene Oxide: Synthesis and Characterization of Polyether in the Undergraduate Organic Chemistry Laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1