Henry H. Mattingly, Keita Kamino, Jude Ong, Rafaela Kottou, Thierry Emonet, Benjamin B. Machta
{"title":"E. coli do not count single molecules","authors":"Henry H. Mattingly, Keita Kamino, Jude Ong, Rafaela Kottou, Thierry Emonet, Benjamin B. Machta","doi":"arxiv-2407.07264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organisms must perform sensory-motor behaviors to survive. What bounds or\nconstraints limit behavioral performance? Previously, we found that the\ngradient-climbing speed of a chemotaxing Escherichia coli is near a bound set\nby the limited information they acquire from their chemical environments. Here\nwe ask what limits their sensory accuracy. Past theoretical analyses have shown\nthat the stochasticity of single molecule arrivals sets a fundamental limit on\nthe precision of chemical sensing. Although it has been argued that bacteria\napproach this limit, direct evidence is lacking. Here, using information theory\nand quantitative experiments, we find that E. coli's chemosensing is not\nlimited by the physics of particle counting. First, we derive the physical\nlimit on the behaviorally-relevant information that any sensor can get about a\nchanging chemical concentration, assuming that every molecule arriving at the\nsensor is recorded. Then, we derive and measure how much information E. coli's\nsignaling pathway encodes during chemotaxis. We find that E. coli encode two\norders of magnitude less information than an ideal sensor limited only by shot\nnoise in particle arrivals. These results strongly suggest that constraints\nother than particle arrival noise limit E. coli's sensory fidelity.","PeriodicalId":501321,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.07264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Organisms must perform sensory-motor behaviors to survive. What bounds or
constraints limit behavioral performance? Previously, we found that the
gradient-climbing speed of a chemotaxing Escherichia coli is near a bound set
by the limited information they acquire from their chemical environments. Here
we ask what limits their sensory accuracy. Past theoretical analyses have shown
that the stochasticity of single molecule arrivals sets a fundamental limit on
the precision of chemical sensing. Although it has been argued that bacteria
approach this limit, direct evidence is lacking. Here, using information theory
and quantitative experiments, we find that E. coli's chemosensing is not
limited by the physics of particle counting. First, we derive the physical
limit on the behaviorally-relevant information that any sensor can get about a
changing chemical concentration, assuming that every molecule arriving at the
sensor is recorded. Then, we derive and measure how much information E. coli's
signaling pathway encodes during chemotaxis. We find that E. coli encode two
orders of magnitude less information than an ideal sensor limited only by shot
noise in particle arrivals. These results strongly suggest that constraints
other than particle arrival noise limit E. coli's sensory fidelity.