E. coli do not count single molecules

Henry H. Mattingly, Keita Kamino, Jude Ong, Rafaela Kottou, Thierry Emonet, Benjamin B. Machta
{"title":"E. coli do not count single molecules","authors":"Henry H. Mattingly, Keita Kamino, Jude Ong, Rafaela Kottou, Thierry Emonet, Benjamin B. Machta","doi":"arxiv-2407.07264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organisms must perform sensory-motor behaviors to survive. What bounds or\nconstraints limit behavioral performance? Previously, we found that the\ngradient-climbing speed of a chemotaxing Escherichia coli is near a bound set\nby the limited information they acquire from their chemical environments. Here\nwe ask what limits their sensory accuracy. Past theoretical analyses have shown\nthat the stochasticity of single molecule arrivals sets a fundamental limit on\nthe precision of chemical sensing. Although it has been argued that bacteria\napproach this limit, direct evidence is lacking. Here, using information theory\nand quantitative experiments, we find that E. coli's chemosensing is not\nlimited by the physics of particle counting. First, we derive the physical\nlimit on the behaviorally-relevant information that any sensor can get about a\nchanging chemical concentration, assuming that every molecule arriving at the\nsensor is recorded. Then, we derive and measure how much information E. coli's\nsignaling pathway encodes during chemotaxis. We find that E. coli encode two\norders of magnitude less information than an ideal sensor limited only by shot\nnoise in particle arrivals. These results strongly suggest that constraints\nother than particle arrival noise limit E. coli's sensory fidelity.","PeriodicalId":501321,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.07264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organisms must perform sensory-motor behaviors to survive. What bounds or constraints limit behavioral performance? Previously, we found that the gradient-climbing speed of a chemotaxing Escherichia coli is near a bound set by the limited information they acquire from their chemical environments. Here we ask what limits their sensory accuracy. Past theoretical analyses have shown that the stochasticity of single molecule arrivals sets a fundamental limit on the precision of chemical sensing. Although it has been argued that bacteria approach this limit, direct evidence is lacking. Here, using information theory and quantitative experiments, we find that E. coli's chemosensing is not limited by the physics of particle counting. First, we derive the physical limit on the behaviorally-relevant information that any sensor can get about a changing chemical concentration, assuming that every molecule arriving at the sensor is recorded. Then, we derive and measure how much information E. coli's signaling pathway encodes during chemotaxis. We find that E. coli encode two orders of magnitude less information than an ideal sensor limited only by shot noise in particle arrivals. These results strongly suggest that constraints other than particle arrival noise limit E. coli's sensory fidelity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大肠杆菌不计算单个分子
生物必须进行感官运动行为才能生存。是什么界限或约束限制了行为表现?之前,我们发现大肠杆菌的化学趋向爬行速度接近它们从化学环境中获取的有限信息所设定的界限。在此,我们想知道是什么限制了它们的感官准确性。过去的理论分析表明,单分子到达的随机性为化学感应的精确性设定了基本限制。尽管有人认为细菌已经接近了这一极限,但却缺乏直接证据。在这里,我们利用信息论和定量实验发现,大肠杆菌的化学传感不受粒子计数物理学的限制。首先,我们推导出了任何传感器所能获得的有关化学浓度变化的行为相关信息的物理极限,假设每一个到达传感器的分子都被记录下来。然后,我们推导并测量了大肠杆菌信号通路在趋化过程中编码的信息量。我们发现,与理想的传感器相比,大肠杆菌编码的信息量要少两个数量级,而理想的传感器只受到粒子到达时的镜头噪声的限制。这些结果有力地表明,除了粒子到达噪声之外,还有其他因素限制了大肠杆菌的感官保真度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Persistent pseudopod splitting is an effective chemotaxis strategy in shallow gradients Geometric Effects in Large Scale Intracellular Flows Motion Ordering in Cellular Polar-polar and Polar-nonpolar Interactions Modelling how lamellipodia-driven cells maintain persistent migration and interact with external barriers Synchronized Memory-Dependent Intracellular Oscillations for a Cell-Bulk ODE-PDE Model in $\mathbb{R}^2$
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1