Influence of multiple risk factor control level on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae056
Xinyi Peng, Miaomiao Zhuang, Qirui Song, Jingjing Bai, Jun Cai
{"title":"Influence of multiple risk factor control level on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.","authors":"Xinyi Peng, Miaomiao Zhuang, Qirui Song, Jingjing Bai, Jun Cai","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The relationship between the level of baseline risk factor control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure intervention is not well understood. It is also unclear whether the level of baseline risk factor control is persuasively associated with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure lowering strategy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed an analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Participants without complete baseline risk factor data were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and estimate association between risk factor control levels (≥6, 5, 4, and ≤ 3) and cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8337 participants were involved in the analysis and the median follow-up period was 3.19 years. Each additional risk factor uncontrolled was associated with a 24% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37). Compared with participants with optimal risk factor control, those with ≤ 3 factors control exhibited 95% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.37-2.77). The corresponding protective effects of multiple risk factor modification were not influenced by intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment (P for interaction = 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A stepwise association was observed between cardiovascular risk and the number of risk factor control in hypertensive patients. The more risk factor was modified, the less cardiovascular risk was observed, irrespective of different blood pressure lowering strategies. Comprehensive risk factor control strategies are warranted to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients. Trial registration STEP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311. Registered 2 January 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The relationship between the level of baseline risk factor control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure intervention is not well understood. It is also unclear whether the level of baseline risk factor control is persuasively associated with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure lowering strategy.

Method: We performed an analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Participants without complete baseline risk factor data were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and estimate association between risk factor control levels (≥6, 5, 4, and ≤ 3) and cardiovascular outcomes.

Results: A total of 8337 participants were involved in the analysis and the median follow-up period was 3.19 years. Each additional risk factor uncontrolled was associated with a 24% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37). Compared with participants with optimal risk factor control, those with ≤ 3 factors control exhibited 95% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.37-2.77). The corresponding protective effects of multiple risk factor modification were not influenced by intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment (P for interaction = 0.71).

Conclusions: A stepwise association was observed between cardiovascular risk and the number of risk factor control in hypertensive patients. The more risk factor was modified, the less cardiovascular risk was observed, irrespective of different blood pressure lowering strategies. Comprehensive risk factor control strategies are warranted to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients. Trial registration STEP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311. Registered 2 January 2017.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重危险因素控制水平对高血压患者心血管预后的影响。
目的:对高血压患者进行血压干预时,基线危险因素控制水平与心血管预后之间的关系尚不十分清楚。基线危险因素控制水平与高血压患者接受降压干预后的心血管预后是否有说服力也不清楚:我们对老年高血压患者血压干预策略(STEP)试验进行了分析。没有完整基线危险因素数据的参与者被排除在外。主要结果是心血管事件和全因死亡率的复合结果。Cox比例危险模型用于计算危险比(HR)和估计危险因素控制水平(≥6、5、4和≤3)与心血管结局之间的关系:共有 8337 人参与了分析,中位随访时间为 3.19 年。未控制的风险因素每增加一个,心血管风险就会增加24%(HR 1.24,95% CI 1.11-1.37)。与最佳控制风险因素的参与者相比,控制了≤3个风险因素的参与者心血管风险高出95%(HR 1.95,95% CI 1.37-2.77)。多种风险因素调整的相应保护作用不受强化或标准降压治疗的影响(交互作用的 P = 0.71):结论:高血压患者的心血管风险与控制危险因素的数量之间存在逐步关联。无论采用何种降压策略,改变的危险因素越多,心血管风险就越低。要降低高血压患者的心血管疾病风险,必须采取全面的风险因素控制策略。试验注册 STEP ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03015311。2017年1月2日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Should we routinely measure patient quality of life after acute coronary syndrome? National health expenditure per capita is associated with CRT implantation practice: findings from the ESC CRT Survey II with 11 088 patients. Impact of intravascular ultrasound for coronary bifurcations treated with last generations stents: insights from the BIFURCAT-ULTRA registry. Treatment with PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies is associated with discontinuation of oral lipid lowering therapy. Quality indicators for improved cardiovascular care: learnings from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1