Transcriptome- and DNA methylation-based cell-type deconvolutions produce similar estimates of differential gene expression and differential methylation.

IF 4 3区 生物学 Q1 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Biodata Mining Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1186/s13040-024-00374-0
Emily R Hannon, Carmen J Marsit, Arlene E Dent, Paula Embury, Sidney Ogolla, David Midem, Scott M Williams, James W Kazura
{"title":"Transcriptome- and DNA methylation-based cell-type deconvolutions produce similar estimates of differential gene expression and differential methylation.","authors":"Emily R Hannon, Carmen J Marsit, Arlene E Dent, Paula Embury, Sidney Ogolla, David Midem, Scott M Williams, James W Kazura","doi":"10.1186/s13040-024-00374-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Changing cell-type proportions can confound studies of differential gene expression or DNA methylation (DNAm) from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). We examined how cell-type proportions derived from the transcriptome versus the methylome (DNAm) influence estimates of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially methylated positions (DMPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transcriptome and DNAm data were obtained from PBMC RNA and DNA of Kenyan children (n = 8) before, during, and 6 weeks following uncomplicated malaria. DEGs and DMPs between time points were detected using cell-type adjusted modeling with Cibersortx or IDOL, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most major cell types and principal components had moderate to high correlation between the two deconvolution methods (r = 0.60-0.96). Estimates of cell-type proportions and DEGs or DMPs were largely unaffected by the method, with the greatest discrepancy in the estimation of neutrophils.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Variation in cell-type proportions is captured similarly by both transcriptomic and methylome deconvolution methods for most major cell types.</p>","PeriodicalId":48947,"journal":{"name":"Biodata Mining","volume":"17 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11241886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodata Mining","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-024-00374-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Changing cell-type proportions can confound studies of differential gene expression or DNA methylation (DNAm) from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). We examined how cell-type proportions derived from the transcriptome versus the methylome (DNAm) influence estimates of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially methylated positions (DMPs).

Methods: Transcriptome and DNAm data were obtained from PBMC RNA and DNA of Kenyan children (n = 8) before, during, and 6 weeks following uncomplicated malaria. DEGs and DMPs between time points were detected using cell-type adjusted modeling with Cibersortx or IDOL, respectively.

Results: Most major cell types and principal components had moderate to high correlation between the two deconvolution methods (r = 0.60-0.96). Estimates of cell-type proportions and DEGs or DMPs were largely unaffected by the method, with the greatest discrepancy in the estimation of neutrophils.

Conclusion: Variation in cell-type proportions is captured similarly by both transcriptomic and methylome deconvolution methods for most major cell types.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转录组和基于 DNA 甲基化的细胞类型解旋对差异基因表达和差异甲基化的估计结果相似。
背景:细胞类型比例的改变可能会混淆外周血单核细胞(PBMCs)差异基因表达或DNA甲基化(DNAm)的研究。我们研究了来自转录组与甲基组(DNAm)的细胞类型比例如何影响差异表达基因(DEGs)和差异甲基化位置(DMPs)的估计值:转录组和 DNAm 数据来自无并发症疟疾发生前、发生期间和发生后 6 周的肯尼亚儿童(n = 8)的 PBMC RNA 和 DNA。利用Cibersortx或IDOL的细胞类型调整模型分别检测时间点之间的DEGs和DMPs:大多数主要细胞类型和主成分在两种解卷积方法之间具有中度到高度的相关性(r = 0.60-0.96)。细胞类型比例和 DEG 或 DMP 的估计值基本不受方法的影响,中性粒细胞的估计值差异最大:结论:对于大多数主要细胞类型,转录组学和甲基组学解旋方法都能相似地捕捉到细胞类型比例的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biodata Mining
Biodata Mining MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: BioData Mining is an open access, open peer-reviewed journal encompassing research on all aspects of data mining applied to high-dimensional biological and biomedical data, focusing on computational aspects of knowledge discovery from large-scale genetic, transcriptomic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Development, evaluation, and application of novel data mining and machine learning algorithms. -Adaptation, evaluation, and application of traditional data mining and machine learning algorithms. -Open-source software for the application of data mining and machine learning algorithms. -Design, development and integration of databases, software and web services for the storage, management, retrieval, and analysis of data from large scale studies. -Pre-processing, post-processing, modeling, and interpretation of data mining and machine learning results for biological interpretation and knowledge discovery.
期刊最新文献
AI as an accelerator for defining new problems that transcends boundaries. Machine learning models for reinjury risk prediction using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data: optimizing athlete recovery. Feature graphs for interpretable unsupervised tree ensembles: centrality, interaction, and application in disease subtyping. Agenda setting for health equity assessment through the lenses of social determinants of health using machine learning approach: a framework and preliminary pilot study. Immune cell profiles and predictive modeling in osteoporotic vertebral fractures using XGBoost machine learning algorithms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1