{"title":"Securing sufficient uptake and sequence progression – För att (‘because’)-prefaced self-continuations and gesture in Swedish talk-in-interaction","authors":"Sara Rönnqvist","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2024.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article scrutinizes how speakers in multi-party conversations on visual art use the Swedish connective <em>för att</em> ‘because’ in conjunction with their embodied behavior to elaborate on their prior contributions that have not received sufficient uptake by their recipients. The present multimodal interactional analysis demonstrates that the general interactional motivations for the use of turn-expanding practices with <em>för att</em> are to manage not fully affiliating responses or a complete lack of uptake. The connective <em>för att</em> operates discursively and marks the upcoming talk as an explanation of some sort. The <em>för att</em>-prefaced contribution serves as a justification and a warrant for a first action, as well as elaborating on or merely reformulating it. The speakers also signal with embodied cues that they are prepared to elaborate on their first contribution. After having deployed depicting or pointing gestures during their first contribution, the speakers do not retract to a full embodied rest position, but halt in an intermediate body position alongside or directly after the syntactic completion of the first contribution. Thus, the speakers treat the transition space multimodally as optional slots for further talk, depending on the recipiency that the initial contribution accomplishes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Pages 41-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001231","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article scrutinizes how speakers in multi-party conversations on visual art use the Swedish connective för att ‘because’ in conjunction with their embodied behavior to elaborate on their prior contributions that have not received sufficient uptake by their recipients. The present multimodal interactional analysis demonstrates that the general interactional motivations for the use of turn-expanding practices with för att are to manage not fully affiliating responses or a complete lack of uptake. The connective för att operates discursively and marks the upcoming talk as an explanation of some sort. The för att-prefaced contribution serves as a justification and a warrant for a first action, as well as elaborating on or merely reformulating it. The speakers also signal with embodied cues that they are prepared to elaborate on their first contribution. After having deployed depicting or pointing gestures during their first contribution, the speakers do not retract to a full embodied rest position, but halt in an intermediate body position alongside or directly after the syntactic completion of the first contribution. Thus, the speakers treat the transition space multimodally as optional slots for further talk, depending on the recipiency that the initial contribution accomplishes.
本文仔细研究了在关于视觉艺术的多方对话中,说话者如何将瑞典语连接词 för att "因为 "与他们的具身行为结合起来,以阐述他们之前的贡献,而这些贡献并未得到受话者的充分认可。本报告的多模态互动分析表明,使用 för att 来扩展回合的一般互动动机是为了处理不完全隶属的回应或完全不被接受的情况。连接词 för att 具有话语功能,标志着即将进行的谈话是某种解释。för att 前置词既是第一个行动的理由和依据,也是对第一个行动的阐述或仅仅是重新表述。说话者还会通过身体暗示来表示他们准备对第一次发言进行阐述。在第一次发言中使用了描绘或指向手势后,说话人并没有退回到完全的身体休息位置,而是在第一次发言的句法完成时或直接在句法完成后停在一个中间的身体位置上。因此,说话者以多种方式将过渡空间视为进一步谈话的可选位置,这取决于首次发言所达到的接受效果。
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.