Secondary grammaticalization and subjectification: A case study of Korean conditional, concessive, and deontic modal eya

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.015
Minju Kim
{"title":"Secondary grammaticalization and subjectification: A case study of Korean conditional, concessive, and deontic modal eya","authors":"Minju Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using diachronic corpus data, this study investigates the developmental journey of the Korean connective <em>eya</em>, which denotes conditional, concessive, and deontic modal meanings. The study proposes that <em>eya</em> consists of the connective <em>e</em> ‘and (then)’, ‘after’ and the focus particle <em>ya</em>, which can be read as ‘only’ or ‘even’ depending on context. At first, focus <em>ya</em> with the meaning of ‘only’ was attached to connective <em>e</em> ‘after’ to emphasize the temporal meaning. Their combination <em>eya</em> ‘only after’, serving as temporal background for the following main clause, grammaticalized into conditional <em>eya</em> ‘only if’. Subsequently, conditional <em>eya</em> ‘only if’ developed into concessive conditional <em>eya</em> ‘even if’ by occurring with extreme values, and this eventually became concessive <em>eya</em> ‘even though’. In addition, this study offers counter-evidence to recent proposals that secondary grammaticalization does not involve subjectification or even leads to the loss of subjective or expressive meanings. As in the case of <em>eya</em>, concessive markers often emerge from existing grammatical markers, and their grammaticalization usually involves increased subjectivity (e.g., speaker's surprise at an event countering expectations), rather than its loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 86-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000219","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using diachronic corpus data, this study investigates the developmental journey of the Korean connective eya, which denotes conditional, concessive, and deontic modal meanings. The study proposes that eya consists of the connective e ‘and (then)’, ‘after’ and the focus particle ya, which can be read as ‘only’ or ‘even’ depending on context. At first, focus ya with the meaning of ‘only’ was attached to connective e ‘after’ to emphasize the temporal meaning. Their combination eya ‘only after’, serving as temporal background for the following main clause, grammaticalized into conditional eya ‘only if’. Subsequently, conditional eya ‘only if’ developed into concessive conditional eya ‘even if’ by occurring with extreme values, and this eventually became concessive eya ‘even though’. In addition, this study offers counter-evidence to recent proposals that secondary grammaticalization does not involve subjectification or even leads to the loss of subjective or expressive meanings. As in the case of eya, concessive markers often emerge from existing grammatical markers, and their grammaticalization usually involves increased subjectivity (e.g., speaker's surprise at an event countering expectations), rather than its loss.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
期刊最新文献
Can ChatGPT recognize impoliteness? An exploratory study of the pragmatic awareness of a large language model Secondary grammaticalization and subjectification: A case study of Korean conditional, concessive, and deontic modal eya (Re)categorizing lexical encapsulation: An experimental approach When is it legitimate to cancel a potential scalar implicature? The roles of the Question Under Discussion and optimal relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1