{"title":"Secondary grammaticalization and subjectification: A case study of Korean conditional, concessive, and deontic modal eya","authors":"Minju Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using diachronic corpus data, this study investigates the developmental journey of the Korean connective <em>eya</em>, which denotes conditional, concessive, and deontic modal meanings. The study proposes that <em>eya</em> consists of the connective <em>e</em> ‘and (then)’, ‘after’ and the focus particle <em>ya</em>, which can be read as ‘only’ or ‘even’ depending on context. At first, focus <em>ya</em> with the meaning of ‘only’ was attached to connective <em>e</em> ‘after’ to emphasize the temporal meaning. Their combination <em>eya</em> ‘only after’, serving as temporal background for the following main clause, grammaticalized into conditional <em>eya</em> ‘only if’. Subsequently, conditional <em>eya</em> ‘only if’ developed into concessive conditional <em>eya</em> ‘even if’ by occurring with extreme values, and this eventually became concessive <em>eya</em> ‘even though’. In addition, this study offers counter-evidence to recent proposals that secondary grammaticalization does not involve subjectification or even leads to the loss of subjective or expressive meanings. As in the case of <em>eya</em>, concessive markers often emerge from existing grammatical markers, and their grammaticalization usually involves increased subjectivity (e.g., speaker's surprise at an event countering expectations), rather than its loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 86-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000219","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Using diachronic corpus data, this study investigates the developmental journey of the Korean connective eya, which denotes conditional, concessive, and deontic modal meanings. The study proposes that eya consists of the connective e ‘and (then)’, ‘after’ and the focus particle ya, which can be read as ‘only’ or ‘even’ depending on context. At first, focus ya with the meaning of ‘only’ was attached to connective e ‘after’ to emphasize the temporal meaning. Their combination eya ‘only after’, serving as temporal background for the following main clause, grammaticalized into conditional eya ‘only if’. Subsequently, conditional eya ‘only if’ developed into concessive conditional eya ‘even if’ by occurring with extreme values, and this eventually became concessive eya ‘even though’. In addition, this study offers counter-evidence to recent proposals that secondary grammaticalization does not involve subjectification or even leads to the loss of subjective or expressive meanings. As in the case of eya, concessive markers often emerge from existing grammatical markers, and their grammaticalization usually involves increased subjectivity (e.g., speaker's surprise at an event countering expectations), rather than its loss.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.