{"title":"I like it: Comparing children’s ratings of their own and others’ food acceptance","authors":"Micah Hoggatt, Beatrice Perry, Simone P. Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores children’s food acceptance, liking of single foods, with a focus on whether children expect that people share similar food likes considering the evolutionary, biological, and social underpinnings of this domain. In this study, 41 children (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 8.26 years; 37 % female, 56 % male, 7 % nonbinary; 85.4 % White, 7.2 % Bi/Multiracial, 4.8 % Asian, 2.4 % Black) were asked about their own liking and to predict others’ liking of two food product categories: ice cream and broccoli. The results reveal that children report stronger food liking for themselves than others (Cohen’s <em>d</em>’s > 0.50), but only for ice cream, not broccoli (Cohen’s <em>d</em>’s > 0.40). These results begin to suggest that children recognize that their food acceptance can vary from others’, which has potential implications across diverse fields (e.g., psychology, consumer science, education, and dietetics). For example, the findings can inform food product development by enabling tailored designs for children’s distinct food likes. Moreover, understanding children’s food likes can be used to promote healthful eating and influence food purchases as children become consumers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 105262"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001642","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores children’s food acceptance, liking of single foods, with a focus on whether children expect that people share similar food likes considering the evolutionary, biological, and social underpinnings of this domain. In this study, 41 children (Mage = 8.26 years; 37 % female, 56 % male, 7 % nonbinary; 85.4 % White, 7.2 % Bi/Multiracial, 4.8 % Asian, 2.4 % Black) were asked about their own liking and to predict others’ liking of two food product categories: ice cream and broccoli. The results reveal that children report stronger food liking for themselves than others (Cohen’s d’s > 0.50), but only for ice cream, not broccoli (Cohen’s d’s > 0.40). These results begin to suggest that children recognize that their food acceptance can vary from others’, which has potential implications across diverse fields (e.g., psychology, consumer science, education, and dietetics). For example, the findings can inform food product development by enabling tailored designs for children’s distinct food likes. Moreover, understanding children’s food likes can be used to promote healthful eating and influence food purchases as children become consumers.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.