Pharmacological Enhancement of Dopamine Neurotransmission Does Not Affect Illusory Pattern Perception.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES eNeuro Pub Date : 2024-07-23 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0465-23.2024
Elke Smith, Simon Michalski, Kilian Knauth, Deniz Tuzsus, Hendrik Theis, Thilo van Eimeren, Jan Peters
{"title":"Pharmacological Enhancement of Dopamine Neurotransmission Does Not Affect Illusory Pattern Perception.","authors":"Elke Smith, Simon Michalski, Kilian Knauth, Deniz Tuzsus, Hendrik Theis, Thilo van Eimeren, Jan Peters","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0465-23.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychotic symptoms and delusional beliefs have been linked to dopamine transmission in both healthy and clinical samples and are assumed to result at least in part from perceiving illusory patterns in noise. However, the existing literature on the role of dopamine in detecting patterns in noise is inconclusive. To address this issue, we assessed the effect of manipulating dopaminergic neurotransmission on illusory pattern perception in healthy individuals (<i>n </i>= 48, <i>n </i>= 19 female) in a double-blind placebo-controlled within-subjects design (see preregistration at https://osf.io/a4k9j/). We predicted individuals on versus off ʟ-DOPA to be more likely to perceive illusory patterns, specifically objects in images containing only noise. Using a signal detection model, however, we found no credible evidence that ʟ-DOPA compared with placebo increased false alarm rates. Further, ʟ-DOPA did not reliably modulate measures of accuracy, discrimination sensitivity, and response bias. In all cases, Bayesian statistics revealed strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. The task design followed previous work on illusory pattern perception and comprised a limited number of items per condition. The results therefore need to be interpreted with caution, as power was limited. Future studies should address illusory pattern perception using more items and take into account potential dose-dependent effects and differential effects in healthy versus clinical samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0465-23.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychotic symptoms and delusional beliefs have been linked to dopamine transmission in both healthy and clinical samples and are assumed to result at least in part from perceiving illusory patterns in noise. However, the existing literature on the role of dopamine in detecting patterns in noise is inconclusive. To address this issue, we assessed the effect of manipulating dopaminergic neurotransmission on illusory pattern perception in healthy individuals (n = 48, n = 19 female) in a double-blind placebo-controlled within-subjects design (see preregistration at https://osf.io/a4k9j/). We predicted individuals on versus off ʟ-DOPA to be more likely to perceive illusory patterns, specifically objects in images containing only noise. Using a signal detection model, however, we found no credible evidence that ʟ-DOPA compared with placebo increased false alarm rates. Further, ʟ-DOPA did not reliably modulate measures of accuracy, discrimination sensitivity, and response bias. In all cases, Bayesian statistics revealed strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. The task design followed previous work on illusory pattern perception and comprised a limited number of items per condition. The results therefore need to be interpreted with caution, as power was limited. Future studies should address illusory pattern perception using more items and take into account potential dose-dependent effects and differential effects in healthy versus clinical samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物增强多巴胺神经传递不会影响幻觉模式感知。
在健康和临床样本中,精神病症状和妄想信念都与多巴胺传递有关,并被认为至少部分是由于感知到噪音中的虚幻模式所致。然而,关于多巴胺在检测噪音模式中的作用的现有文献尚无定论。为了解决这个问题,我们在双盲安慰剂对照的受试者内设计中,评估了操纵多巴胺能神经递质对健康人(48 人,19 名女性)幻觉模式感知的影响(见 https://osf.io/a4k9j/ 上的预先登记)。我们预测,服用 L-DOPA 与未服用 L-DOPA 的个体更容易感知到虚幻模式,特别是仅包含噪声的图像中的物体。然而,通过使用信号检测模型,我们没有发现可信的证据表明 L-DOPA 与安慰剂相比会增加误报率。此外,L-DOPA 对准确性、辨别灵敏度和反应偏差的测量也没有可靠的调节作用。在所有情况下,贝叶斯统计都显示出支持零假设的有力证据。任务设计沿用了以往有关幻觉模式感知的研究成果,每个条件下的项目数量有限。因此,由于功率有限,在解释结果时需要谨慎。未来的研究应该使用更多的项目来研究虚幻模式感知,并考虑到潜在的剂量依赖效应以及健康样本与临床样本的不同效应。然而,关于多巴胺在检测虚幻模式中的作用的研究结果尚无定论。为了解决这个问题,我们评估了增强多巴胺传递对健康人幻觉模式感知的影响。我们的假设是,增强多巴胺传递会提高参与者感知噪声中虚幻图案的倾向,但这一假设并未得到证实。这种无效效应表明,之前的研究结果可能没有之前认为的那么可靠,多巴胺与幻觉模式感知之间的关系可能受剂量依赖效应的影响,而且在健康样本与临床样本中可能存在不同的效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Dependent Changes in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neuron Voltage-Gated Potassium Currents in a Mouse Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Bilateral Alignment of Receptive Fields in the Olfactory Cortex. Peripheral CaV2.2 channels in skin regulate prolonged heat hypersensitivity during neuroinflammation. The Neural Correlates of Spontaneous Beat Processing and Its Relationship with Music-Related Characteristics of the Individual. The Orbitofrontal Cortex Is Required for Learned Modulation of Innate Olfactory Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1