Hippocampal activations obtained during language fMRI tasks: a complementary tool for predicting postoperative memory prognosis

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107405
Eve Salleles , Séverine Samson , Marisa Denos , Marie Mere , Stéphane Lehericy , Bastien Herlin , Sophie Dupont
{"title":"Hippocampal activations obtained during language fMRI tasks: a complementary tool for predicting postoperative memory prognosis","authors":"Eve Salleles ,&nbsp;Séverine Samson ,&nbsp;Marisa Denos ,&nbsp;Marie Mere ,&nbsp;Stéphane Lehericy ,&nbsp;Bastien Herlin ,&nbsp;Sophie Dupont","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), the benefits of surgery must be balanced against the risk of post-operative memory decline. Prediction of postoperative outcomes based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) tasks is increasingly common but remains uncertain. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether hippocampal activations elicited by fMRI language tasks could enhance or refine memory fMRI in MTLE patients candidates to surgery. Forty-six patients were included: 30 right and 16 left MTLE, mostly with hippocampal sclerosis. Preoperative assessment included neuropsychological tests and fMRI with language (syntactic verbal fluency) and memory tasks (encoding, delayed, and immediate recognition of images of objects). Thirty patients underwent surgery and had neuropsychological evaluations one year after surgery. Worsening was defined as a degradation of more than 10% in postoperative forgetting scores compared to preoperative scores in verbal, non-verbal and global memory. Memory fMRI had the best sensitivity with hippocampal activations obtained in 95% of patients, versus 65% with language fMRI. Considering the patients who elicited an hippocampal activation, language fMRI led to 80%, 65% and 85% of correct predictions for respectively global, verbal and non verbal memory (versus 71%, 64% and 68% with memory fMRI). Memory and language fMRI predictions outperformed those made by neuropsychological tests. In summary, language fMRI was less sensitive than memory fMRI to elicit hippocampal activations but when it did, the proportion of correct memory predictions was better. Moreover, it proved to be an independent predictive factor regardless of the side of the epileptic focus. Given the ease of setting up a language task in fMRI, we recommend the systematic combination of memory and language tasks to predict the post-operative memory outcome of MTLE patients undergoing epilepsy surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 107405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), the benefits of surgery must be balanced against the risk of post-operative memory decline. Prediction of postoperative outcomes based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) tasks is increasingly common but remains uncertain. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether hippocampal activations elicited by fMRI language tasks could enhance or refine memory fMRI in MTLE patients candidates to surgery. Forty-six patients were included: 30 right and 16 left MTLE, mostly with hippocampal sclerosis. Preoperative assessment included neuropsychological tests and fMRI with language (syntactic verbal fluency) and memory tasks (encoding, delayed, and immediate recognition of images of objects). Thirty patients underwent surgery and had neuropsychological evaluations one year after surgery. Worsening was defined as a degradation of more than 10% in postoperative forgetting scores compared to preoperative scores in verbal, non-verbal and global memory. Memory fMRI had the best sensitivity with hippocampal activations obtained in 95% of patients, versus 65% with language fMRI. Considering the patients who elicited an hippocampal activation, language fMRI led to 80%, 65% and 85% of correct predictions for respectively global, verbal and non verbal memory (versus 71%, 64% and 68% with memory fMRI). Memory and language fMRI predictions outperformed those made by neuropsychological tests. In summary, language fMRI was less sensitive than memory fMRI to elicit hippocampal activations but when it did, the proportion of correct memory predictions was better. Moreover, it proved to be an independent predictive factor regardless of the side of the epileptic focus. Given the ease of setting up a language task in fMRI, we recommend the systematic combination of memory and language tasks to predict the post-operative memory outcome of MTLE patients undergoing epilepsy surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言 fMRI 任务中获得的海马激活:预测术后记忆预后的辅助工具。
在内侧颞叶癫痫(MTLE)患者中,手术的益处必须与术后记忆力下降的风险相平衡。根据功能磁共振成像(fMRI)任务预测术后结果的做法越来越普遍,但仍不确定。这项回顾性研究旨在确定 fMRI 语言任务引起的海马激活是否能增强或完善 MTLE 患者的术后记忆 fMRI。研究共纳入 46 名患者:其中右侧 MTLE 患者 30 人,左侧 MTLE 患者 16 人,大部分患者患有海马硬化症。术前评估包括神经心理学测试以及语言(句法言语流畅性)和记忆任务(物体图像的编码、延迟和即时识别)的 fMRI。30 名患者接受了手术,并在术后一年接受了神经心理学评估。与术前相比,术后遗忘评分在言语、非言语和整体记忆方面的下降幅度超过 10% 即为病情恶化。记忆 fMRI 的灵敏度最高,95% 的患者获得了海马激活,而语言 fMRI 只有 65%。对于海马激活的患者,语言 fMRI 对全局记忆、言语记忆和非言语记忆的预测正确率分别为 80%、65% 和 85%(而记忆 fMRI 预测正确率分别为 71%、64% 和 68%)。记忆和语言 fMRI 预测结果优于神经心理测试结果。总之,语言 fMRI 对海马激活的敏感度低于记忆 fMRI,但当语言 fMRI 引起海马激活时,记忆预测的正确率更高。此外,无论癫痫灶位于哪一侧,语言 fMRI 都被证明是一个独立的预测因素。鉴于在 fMRI 中设置语言任务非常容易,我们建议系统地结合记忆和语言任务来预测接受癫痫手术的 MTLE 患者的术后记忆结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cannabis use, sleep and mood disturbances among persons with epilepsy – A clinical and polysomnography study from a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center Evaluating the late seizures of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion via monitoring using continuous electroencephalogram Validation of hemispherectomy outcome prediction scale in treatment of medically intractable epilepsy MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers of response to modified Atkins diet in treatment of adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1