The use of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal ultrasound: a systematic review of the literature.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiologia Medica Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1007/s11547-024-01856-1
Jonas M Getzmann, Giulia Zantonelli, Carmelo Messina, Domenico Albano, Francesca Serpi, Salvatore Gitto, Luca Maria Sconfienza
{"title":"The use of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal ultrasound: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Jonas M Getzmann, Giulia Zantonelli, Carmelo Messina, Domenico Albano, Francesca Serpi, Salvatore Gitto, Luca Maria Sconfienza","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01856-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To systematically review the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound (US) with an emphasis on AI algorithm categories and validation strategies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An electronic literature search was conducted for articles published up to January 2024. Inclusion criteria were the use of AI in MSK US, involvement of humans, English language, and ethics committee approval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 269 identified papers, 16 studies published between 2020 and 2023 were included. The research was aimed at predicting diagnosis and/or segmentation in a total of 11 (69%) out of 16 studies. A total of 11 (69%) studies used deep learning (DL)-based algorithms, three (19%) studies employed conventional machine learning (ML)-based algorithms, and two (12%) studies employed both conventional ML- and DL-based algorithms. Six (38%) studies used cross-validation techniques with K-fold cross-validation being the most frequently employed (n = 4, 25%). Clinical validation with separate internal test datasets was reported in nine (56%) papers. No external clinical validation was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI is a topic of increasing interest in MSK US research. In future studies, attention should be paid to the use of validation strategies, particularly regarding independent clinical validation performed on external datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":"1405-1411"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01856-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically review the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound (US) with an emphasis on AI algorithm categories and validation strategies.

Material and methods: An electronic literature search was conducted for articles published up to January 2024. Inclusion criteria were the use of AI in MSK US, involvement of humans, English language, and ethics committee approval.

Results: Out of 269 identified papers, 16 studies published between 2020 and 2023 were included. The research was aimed at predicting diagnosis and/or segmentation in a total of 11 (69%) out of 16 studies. A total of 11 (69%) studies used deep learning (DL)-based algorithms, three (19%) studies employed conventional machine learning (ML)-based algorithms, and two (12%) studies employed both conventional ML- and DL-based algorithms. Six (38%) studies used cross-validation techniques with K-fold cross-validation being the most frequently employed (n = 4, 25%). Clinical validation with separate internal test datasets was reported in nine (56%) papers. No external clinical validation was reported.

Conclusion: AI is a topic of increasing interest in MSK US research. In future studies, attention should be paid to the use of validation strategies, particularly regarding independent clinical validation performed on external datasets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在肌肉骨骼超声中的应用:系统性文献综述。
目的:系统回顾人工智能(AI)在肌肉骨骼(MSK)超声(US)中的应用,重点关注人工智能算法类别和验证策略:对截至 2024 年 1 月发表的文章进行电子文献检索。纳入标准是在 MSK US 中使用人工智能、涉及人类、英语和伦理委员会批准:在269篇已确定的论文中,有16篇发表于2020年至2023年的研究被纳入其中。在 16 项研究中,共有 11 项(69%)的研究旨在预测诊断和/或分割。共有 11 项(69%)研究采用了基于深度学习(DL)的算法,3 项(19%)研究采用了基于传统机器学习(ML)的算法,2 项(12%)研究同时采用了基于传统机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)的算法。六项(38%)研究使用了交叉验证技术,其中最常使用的是 K 折交叉验证(n = 4,25%)。9篇(56%)论文报告了使用单独的内部测试数据集进行临床验证的情况。没有外部临床验证的报道:结论:人工智能是美国 MSK 研究中一个越来越受关注的话题。在未来的研究中,应注意验证策略的使用,尤其是在外部数据集上进行的独立临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
期刊最新文献
Radiomics based on brain-to-tumor interface enables prediction of metastatic tumor type of brain metastasis: a proof-of-concept study. Impact of body fat composition on liver iron overload severity in hemochromatosis: a retrospective MRI analysis. A multi-center, multi-organ, multi-omic prediction model for treatment-induced severe oral mucositis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Advancing precision in CT-guided bone biopsies: exploring the potential of dual-energy CT imaging. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the role of CBCT in rectal cancer radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1