Weight censorial score: estimation of the weight loss during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients by image features predicts prognosis.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiologia Medica Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s11547-025-01953-9
Jiachen Sun, Sai Kit Edmond Lam, Jiang Zhang, Xinzhi Teng, Francis Kar-Ho Lee, Celia Wai-Yi Yip, James Chung Hang Chow, Victor Ho Fun Lee, Ying Sun, Jing Cai
{"title":"Weight censorial score: estimation of the weight loss during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients by image features predicts prognosis.","authors":"Jiachen Sun, Sai Kit Edmond Lam, Jiang Zhang, Xinzhi Teng, Francis Kar-Ho Lee, Celia Wai-Yi Yip, James Chung Hang Chow, Victor Ho Fun Lee, Ying Sun, Jing Cai","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-01953-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bodyweight loss is commonly found in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma patients during Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) and has implications for treatment decisions. However, the prognostic value of this weight loss remains uncertain. We addressed it by proposing a novel index Weight Censorial Score (WCS) that characterizes the patient-specific CCRT response on actual to estimated weight loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study included 315 patients from two independent hospitals. An Estimated WCS (eWCS) was obtained through linear regression of image and dosimetry features. The eWCS was converted to an estimated net weight loss (nWL), with its accuracy evaluated. The Determined WCS (dWCS) was calculated by centering and scaling the post-RT actual nWL with patient's pre-RT body information. The ratio of dWCS to eWCS (WCS ratio) reflected the actual to estimated weight loss of a patient. The prognostic ability of WCS ratio dichotomized at 1 was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean absolute error of estimated to actual nWL was 1.84 kg. Patients who had their actual WL larger than estimated WL were found to have significantly worse OS (p = 0.005, HR = 3.35[1.45-7.73]), PFS (p = 0.038, HR = 1.86[1.03-3.35]), and DMFS (p = 0.050, HR = 2.20[1.00-4.85]), respectively, in multivariable cox analysis. They were also found not to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.572), whereas the adjuvant chemotherapy provided significant PFS benefit in patients with actual WL smaller than estimated WL (p = 0.036, HR = 0.53[0.29-0.96]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nWL of patient during CCRT can be reasonably estimated by dosimetry factors at pre-RT stage. The prognostic value of the actual to expected weight loss holds promise for highlighting vulnerable patients after CCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":"381-396"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-01953-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bodyweight loss is commonly found in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma patients during Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) and has implications for treatment decisions. However, the prognostic value of this weight loss remains uncertain. We addressed it by proposing a novel index Weight Censorial Score (WCS) that characterizes the patient-specific CCRT response on actual to estimated weight loss.

Methods: A retrospective study included 315 patients from two independent hospitals. An Estimated WCS (eWCS) was obtained through linear regression of image and dosimetry features. The eWCS was converted to an estimated net weight loss (nWL), with its accuracy evaluated. The Determined WCS (dWCS) was calculated by centering and scaling the post-RT actual nWL with patient's pre-RT body information. The ratio of dWCS to eWCS (WCS ratio) reflected the actual to estimated weight loss of a patient. The prognostic ability of WCS ratio dichotomized at 1 was evaluated.

Results: The mean absolute error of estimated to actual nWL was 1.84 kg. Patients who had their actual WL larger than estimated WL were found to have significantly worse OS (p = 0.005, HR = 3.35[1.45-7.73]), PFS (p = 0.038, HR = 1.86[1.03-3.35]), and DMFS (p = 0.050, HR = 2.20[1.00-4.85]), respectively, in multivariable cox analysis. They were also found not to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.572), whereas the adjuvant chemotherapy provided significant PFS benefit in patients with actual WL smaller than estimated WL (p = 0.036, HR = 0.53[0.29-0.96]).

Conclusion: The nWL of patient during CCRT can be reasonably estimated by dosimetry factors at pre-RT stage. The prognostic value of the actual to expected weight loss holds promise for highlighting vulnerable patients after CCRT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重检查评分:通过影像特征估计鼻咽癌患者同步放化疗期间体重减轻情况预测预后。
目的:体重减轻是鼻咽癌患者在同步放化疗(CCRT)期间的常见现象,并对治疗决策有影响。然而,这种体重减轻的预后价值仍然不确定。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个新的体重监测评分(WCS)指标,该指标描述了患者特异性CCRT对实际体重减轻和估计体重减轻的反应。方法:对来自两家独立医院的315例患者进行回顾性研究。通过图像与剂量学特征的线性回归得到估计WCS (eWCS)。eWCS被转换为估计的净减重(nWL),并评估其准确性。确定的WCS (dWCS)是通过将放疗后的实际nWL与患者放疗前的身体信息居中并缩放来计算的。dWCS与eWCS的比值(WCS ratio)反映了患者实际与估计的体重减轻。评估WCS二分率为1的预后能力。结果:估算与实际nWL的平均绝对误差为1.84 kg。在多变量cox分析中,实际WL大于估计WL的患者的OS (p = 0.005, HR = 3.35[1.45-7.73])、PFS (p = 0.038, HR = 1.86[1.03-3.35])和DMFS (p = 0.050, HR = 2.20[1.00-4.85])均明显较差。他们也没有从辅助化疗中获益(p = 0.572),而辅助化疗在实际WL小于估计WL的患者中提供了显著的PFS获益(p = 0.036, HR = 0.53[0.29-0.96])。结论:放疗前剂量学因子可合理估计患者在CCRT中的nWL。实际体重减轻与预期体重减轻的预后价值为CCRT后的弱势患者带来了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
期刊最新文献
AI-assessed sarcopenia as an independent predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. High-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy for treatment of recurrent high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Inter-rater reliability of MRI Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) in the follow-up of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Environmental impact of percutaneous core-needle breast biopsy in 101 Senonetwork Italian breast cancer centers. Tackling external validation challenges: experience with normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for head and neck cancer radiotherapy toxicities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1