The mediating role of systemic inflammation and moderating role of racialization in disparities in incident dementia

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Communications medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1038/s43856-024-00569-w
César Higgins Tejera, Erin B. Ware, Margaret T. Hicken, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Herong Wang, Freida Blostein, Matthew Zawistowski, Bhramar Mukherjee, Kelly M. Bakulski
{"title":"The mediating role of systemic inflammation and moderating role of racialization in disparities in incident dementia","authors":"César Higgins Tejera, Erin B. Ware, Margaret T. Hicken, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Herong Wang, Freida Blostein, Matthew Zawistowski, Bhramar Mukherjee, Kelly M. Bakulski","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00569-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exposure to systemic racism is linked to increased dementia burden. To assess systemic inflammation as a potential pathway linking exposure to racism and dementia disparities, we investigated the mediating role of C-reactive protein (CRP), a systemic inflammation marker, and the moderating role of the racialization process in incident dementia. In the US Health and Retirement Study (n = 6,908), serum CRP was measured at baseline (2006, 2008 waves). Incident dementia was classified by cognitive tests over a six-year follow-up. Self-reported racialized categories were a proxy for exposure to the racialization process. We decomposed racialized disparities in dementia incidence (non-Hispanic Black and/or Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic white) into 1) the mediated effect of CRP, 2) the moderated portion attributable to the interaction between racialized group membership and CRP, and 3) the controlled direct effect (other pathways through which racism operates). The 6-year cumulative incidence of dementia is 12%. Among minoritized participants (i.e., non-Hispanic Black and/or Hispanic), high CRP levels ( ≥ 75th percentile or 4.73μg/mL) are associated with 1.26 (95%CI: 0.98, 1.62) times greater risk of incident dementia than low CRP ( < 4.73μg/mL). Decomposition analysis comparing minoritized versus non-Hispanic white participants shows that the mediating effect of CRP accounts for 3% (95% CI: 0%, 6%) of the racial disparity, while the interaction effect between minoritized group status and high CRP accounts for 14% (95% CI: 1%, 27%) of the disparity. Findings are robust to potential violations of causal mediation assumptions. Minoritized group membership modifies the relationship between systemic inflammation and incident dementia. Higher levels of inflammation in blood are linked to greater dementia risk in older adults. Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Americans have higher inflammation levels compared to non-Hispanic white Americans. We conducted a study to examine whether high levels of inflammation could explain differences in dementia risk among these racial groups. We found that differences in inflammation levels in non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic adults modestly explain their higher risk of dementia compared to non-Hispanic white adults. These findings suggest that interventions aimed at reducing high levels of inflammation in minoritized US adults could ameliorate racial differences in dementia risk. Higgins Tejera et al. employ mediation-interaction decomposition analyses in a large population study to demonstrate how the racialization process and systemic inflammation interact to explain racial disparities in dementia risk. They propose a causal framework to integrate biological pathways in the study of racial disparities in health.","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00569-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to systemic racism is linked to increased dementia burden. To assess systemic inflammation as a potential pathway linking exposure to racism and dementia disparities, we investigated the mediating role of C-reactive protein (CRP), a systemic inflammation marker, and the moderating role of the racialization process in incident dementia. In the US Health and Retirement Study (n = 6,908), serum CRP was measured at baseline (2006, 2008 waves). Incident dementia was classified by cognitive tests over a six-year follow-up. Self-reported racialized categories were a proxy for exposure to the racialization process. We decomposed racialized disparities in dementia incidence (non-Hispanic Black and/or Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic white) into 1) the mediated effect of CRP, 2) the moderated portion attributable to the interaction between racialized group membership and CRP, and 3) the controlled direct effect (other pathways through which racism operates). The 6-year cumulative incidence of dementia is 12%. Among minoritized participants (i.e., non-Hispanic Black and/or Hispanic), high CRP levels ( ≥ 75th percentile or 4.73μg/mL) are associated with 1.26 (95%CI: 0.98, 1.62) times greater risk of incident dementia than low CRP ( < 4.73μg/mL). Decomposition analysis comparing minoritized versus non-Hispanic white participants shows that the mediating effect of CRP accounts for 3% (95% CI: 0%, 6%) of the racial disparity, while the interaction effect between minoritized group status and high CRP accounts for 14% (95% CI: 1%, 27%) of the disparity. Findings are robust to potential violations of causal mediation assumptions. Minoritized group membership modifies the relationship between systemic inflammation and incident dementia. Higher levels of inflammation in blood are linked to greater dementia risk in older adults. Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Americans have higher inflammation levels compared to non-Hispanic white Americans. We conducted a study to examine whether high levels of inflammation could explain differences in dementia risk among these racial groups. We found that differences in inflammation levels in non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic adults modestly explain their higher risk of dementia compared to non-Hispanic white adults. These findings suggest that interventions aimed at reducing high levels of inflammation in minoritized US adults could ameliorate racial differences in dementia risk. Higgins Tejera et al. employ mediation-interaction decomposition analyses in a large population study to demonstrate how the racialization process and systemic inflammation interact to explain racial disparities in dementia risk. They propose a causal framework to integrate biological pathways in the study of racial disparities in health.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性炎症在痴呆症发病差异中的中介作用和种族化的调节作用。
背景:暴露于系统性种族主义与痴呆症负担的增加有关。为了评估系统性炎症作为连接种族主义暴露和痴呆症差异的潜在途径,我们研究了系统性炎症标志物--C反应蛋白(CRP)的中介作用,以及种族化过程在痴呆症事件中的调节作用:在美国健康与退休研究中(n = 6,908),对血清 CRP 进行了基线测量(2006 年和 2008 年)。在为期六年的随访中,通过认知测试对痴呆症进行分类。自我报告的种族化类别代表了种族化过程的暴露程度。我们将痴呆症发病率的种族差异(非西班牙裔黑人和/或西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人)分解为:1)CRP的中介效应;2)种族化群体成员身份与CRP之间相互作用的调节效应;3)受控直接效应(种族主义发挥作用的其他途径):结果:痴呆症的 6 年累计发病率为 12%。在少数族裔参与者(即非西班牙裔黑人和/或西班牙裔)中,高 CRP 水平(≥ 75th 百分位数或 4.73μg/mL)与低 CRP 相比,痴呆症发病风险高出 1.26(95%CI:0.98,1.62)倍(结论:少数群体成员身份改变了全身炎症与痴呆症之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Correction: A cross-sectional and population-based study from primary care on post-COVID-19 conditions in non-hospitalized patients An integrated empirical and computational study to decipher help-seeking behaviors and vocal stigma Survey of the risk behaviors and mental health of adolescents in Gabon risky behaviors and vulnerability of adolescent Africans Inclusiveness of the All of Us Research Program improves polygenic risk scores and fosters genomic medicine for all Recommendations for the equitable integration of digital health interventions across the HIV care cascade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1