{"title":"Capacitated Mobile Facility Location Problem with Mobile Demand: Efficient relief aid provision to en route refugees","authors":"Amirreza Pashapour , Dilek Günneç , F. Sibel Salman , Eda Yücel","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a humanity crisis, the tragedy of forced displacement entails relief aid distribution efforts among en route refugee to alleviate their migration hardships. This study aims to assist humanitarian organizations in cost-efficiently optimizing the logistics of capacitated mobile facilities utilized to deliver relief aid to transiting refugees in a multi-period setting. The problem is referred to as the Capacitated Mobile Facility Location Problem with Mobile Demands (CMFLP-MD). In CMFLP-MD, refugee groups follow specific paths, and meanwhile, they receive relief aid at least once every fixed number of consecutive periods, maintaining continuity of service. To this end, the overall costs associated with capacitated mobile facilities, including fixed, service provision, and relocation costs, are minimized. We formulate a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model and propose two solution methods to solve this complex problem: an accelerated Benders decomposition approach as an exact solution method and a matheuristic algorithm that relies on an enhanced fix-and-optimize agenda. We evaluate our methodologies by designing realistic instances based on the Honduras migration crisis that commenced in 2018. Our numerical results reveal that the accelerated Benders decomposition excels MILP with a 46% run time improvement on average while acquiring solutions at least as good as the MILP across all instances. Moreover, our matheuristic acquires high-quality solutions with a 2.4% average gap compared to best-incumbents rapidly. An in-depth exploration of the solution properties underscores the robustness of our relief distribution plans under varying migration circumstances. Across several metrics, our sensitivity analyses also highlight the managerial advantages of implementing CMFLP-MD solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103138"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832400104X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As a humanity crisis, the tragedy of forced displacement entails relief aid distribution efforts among en route refugee to alleviate their migration hardships. This study aims to assist humanitarian organizations in cost-efficiently optimizing the logistics of capacitated mobile facilities utilized to deliver relief aid to transiting refugees in a multi-period setting. The problem is referred to as the Capacitated Mobile Facility Location Problem with Mobile Demands (CMFLP-MD). In CMFLP-MD, refugee groups follow specific paths, and meanwhile, they receive relief aid at least once every fixed number of consecutive periods, maintaining continuity of service. To this end, the overall costs associated with capacitated mobile facilities, including fixed, service provision, and relocation costs, are minimized. We formulate a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model and propose two solution methods to solve this complex problem: an accelerated Benders decomposition approach as an exact solution method and a matheuristic algorithm that relies on an enhanced fix-and-optimize agenda. We evaluate our methodologies by designing realistic instances based on the Honduras migration crisis that commenced in 2018. Our numerical results reveal that the accelerated Benders decomposition excels MILP with a 46% run time improvement on average while acquiring solutions at least as good as the MILP across all instances. Moreover, our matheuristic acquires high-quality solutions with a 2.4% average gap compared to best-incumbents rapidly. An in-depth exploration of the solution properties underscores the robustness of our relief distribution plans under varying migration circumstances. Across several metrics, our sensitivity analyses also highlight the managerial advantages of implementing CMFLP-MD solutions.
作为一场人类危机,被迫流离失所的悲剧需要向途中难民分发救济援助,以减轻他们的迁移困难。本研究旨在帮助人道主义组织以具有成本效益的方式优化用于在多周期环境下向过境难民提供救济援助的移动设施的物流。该问题被称为移动需求下的移动设施定位问题(Capacitated Mobile Facility Location Problem with Mobile Demands,CMFLP-MD)。在 CMFLP-MD 中,难民群体遵循特定路径,同时每隔固定数量的连续时段至少接受一次救济援助,以保持服务的连续性。为此,需要最大限度地降低与容纳性移动设施相关的总体成本,包括固定成本、服务提供成本和迁移成本。我们提出了一个混合整数线性规划(MILP)模型,并为解决这一复杂问题提出了两种求解方法:一种是作为精确求解方法的加速本德斯分解法,另一种是依赖于增强的固定和优化议程的成熟算法。我们通过设计基于 2018 年开始的洪都拉斯移民危机的现实实例来评估我们的方法。我们的数值结果表明,加速本德斯分解法优于 MILP,运行时间平均缩短了 46%,同时在所有实例中获得的解决方案至少与 MILP 一样好。此外,我们的数学启发式还能快速获得高质量的解决方案,与现有最佳方案相比,平均差距仅为 2.4%。对解决方案特性的深入探讨强调了我们的救济分配计划在不同迁移情况下的稳健性。在多个指标上,我们的敏感性分析也凸显了实施 CMFLP-MD 解决方案的管理优势。
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.