The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene by Michael J. Gormley (review)

IF 0.3 4区 文学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Configurations Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1353/con.2024.a932030
Ian Hill
{"title":"The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene by Michael J. Gormley (review)","authors":"Ian Hill","doi":"10.1353/con.2024.a932030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene</em> by Michael J. Gormley <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ian Hill (bio) </li> </ul> Michael J. Gormley, <em>The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene</em>. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2021, 206 pp., ISBN: 1498594050. <p>In <em>The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene</em>, Michael J. Gormley sheds the limitations of strictly earthbound ecocriticism and looks forward to an era of interplanetary colonization, which he terms “the Astropocene.” Through a series of close readings, Gormley theorizes about how humans might and should interact with novel environments—the moon, Mars, the vacuum of space—and employs ecocriticism in novel ways to interrogate the ethical ramifications of cosmic expansion. <em>The End of the Anthropocene</em> does an admirable job of jarring ecocriticism loose from terrestrial confines and showing its universal value and applicability. In so doing, Gormley carves out new space in ecological discourse, though his efforts are slightly dampened by an overly optimistic view of the near future, an underemphasis on the history and implications of colonization, and a limited archive.</p> <p>Gormley’s book follows the same path humanity has and (he predicts) will, beginning with wilderness before moving to the climate apocalypse in which we currently find ourselves, to near-space colonization, to outer-space colonization, all the while gathering theoretical and speculative momentum. The first chapter, “Ecocriticism and the Universal Ecosystem,” deals with grounded, terrestrial, and familiar subjects that both ecocritics and nonspecialized readers will readily grasp. The book begins with the wolf—a primally familiar figure—and returns to it throughout, just as it does to the dirty, hands-on practice of tracking. Though <em>The End of the Astropocene</em> promises a scientific and perhaps even sci-fi reading experience with its title and lunar cover (and mostly delivers on these promises), it rarely loses sight of the immediate world around us. Gormley takes pains not to alienate the reader. After all, since “the true scope of this book is to prepare humanity for its fast-approaching integration with extraplanetary ecosystems,” it makes sense that he would want to welcome as many readers as possible (14). He even bakes this broad human inclusivity into the word <strong>[End Page 323]</strong> “Astropocene,” preferring it over the more etymologically sound “Astrocene” to retain the human connection.</p> <p>The second chapter, “The Biotic World,” concerns animals (human and otherwise) and how they interface with other creatures and their environment, all of which falls under the umbrella of “biotic identity.” Gormley locates in Cormac McCarthy’s <em>The Crossing</em> and <em>Blood Meridian</em> lessons we can learn and directions we can take to exist “ecoethically” and to “speak as nature”—two goals he deems crucial if we are to move beyond the Anthropocene. Here we see Gormley push against the traditional bounds of ecocriticism with self-awareness and tact. He resists ecocritical pioneer Lawrence Buell’s injunction against trying to speak on behalf of nature and in opposition to “human dominationism” (19), identifies that “ecocriticism needs a novel technique for assessing the biotic human body in forthcoming environs” (72), and accepts the burden of a sort of guide preparing humanity for interplanetary colonization. It is as if the exigency of the incoming Astropocene has overthrown some of the restrictions normally associated with ecocritical writing.</p> <p>In the third chapter, “A Body in the Universal Ecosystem,” we find ourselves in space at last, moving from the history of the International Space Station through readings of what Gormley calls “science fact fiction”—sci-fi texts that prove instructive, via ecocriticism, for humanity’s expansion into space (76). Here the brightest exemplar is Ridley Scott’s film <em>The Martian</em>, which Gormley reads as a “nature narrative” reflecting our future and present (77). He uses this film to imagine what life might be like for the explorers who first colonize and begin to terraform Mars. Terraforming becomes the focus of chapter 4, “The Astropocene,” as it represents the absolute closure of the Anthropocene. Gormley figures terraforming as a flashpoint that “human technology funnels toward” (106), the zenith of environmental efforts, a <em>singularity</em>. He balances his interest in and passion for terraforming with a repeated call for a coherent ecoethic...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":55630,"journal":{"name":"Configurations","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Configurations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2024.a932030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene by Michael J. Gormley
  • Ian Hill (bio)
Michael J. Gormley, The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2021, 206 pp., ISBN: 1498594050.

In The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene, Michael J. Gormley sheds the limitations of strictly earthbound ecocriticism and looks forward to an era of interplanetary colonization, which he terms “the Astropocene.” Through a series of close readings, Gormley theorizes about how humans might and should interact with novel environments—the moon, Mars, the vacuum of space—and employs ecocriticism in novel ways to interrogate the ethical ramifications of cosmic expansion. The End of the Anthropocene does an admirable job of jarring ecocriticism loose from terrestrial confines and showing its universal value and applicability. In so doing, Gormley carves out new space in ecological discourse, though his efforts are slightly dampened by an overly optimistic view of the near future, an underemphasis on the history and implications of colonization, and a limited archive.

Gormley’s book follows the same path humanity has and (he predicts) will, beginning with wilderness before moving to the climate apocalypse in which we currently find ourselves, to near-space colonization, to outer-space colonization, all the while gathering theoretical and speculative momentum. The first chapter, “Ecocriticism and the Universal Ecosystem,” deals with grounded, terrestrial, and familiar subjects that both ecocritics and nonspecialized readers will readily grasp. The book begins with the wolf—a primally familiar figure—and returns to it throughout, just as it does to the dirty, hands-on practice of tracking. Though The End of the Astropocene promises a scientific and perhaps even sci-fi reading experience with its title and lunar cover (and mostly delivers on these promises), it rarely loses sight of the immediate world around us. Gormley takes pains not to alienate the reader. After all, since “the true scope of this book is to prepare humanity for its fast-approaching integration with extraplanetary ecosystems,” it makes sense that he would want to welcome as many readers as possible (14). He even bakes this broad human inclusivity into the word [End Page 323] “Astropocene,” preferring it over the more etymologically sound “Astrocene” to retain the human connection.

The second chapter, “The Biotic World,” concerns animals (human and otherwise) and how they interface with other creatures and their environment, all of which falls under the umbrella of “biotic identity.” Gormley locates in Cormac McCarthy’s The Crossing and Blood Meridian lessons we can learn and directions we can take to exist “ecoethically” and to “speak as nature”—two goals he deems crucial if we are to move beyond the Anthropocene. Here we see Gormley push against the traditional bounds of ecocriticism with self-awareness and tact. He resists ecocritical pioneer Lawrence Buell’s injunction against trying to speak on behalf of nature and in opposition to “human dominationism” (19), identifies that “ecocriticism needs a novel technique for assessing the biotic human body in forthcoming environs” (72), and accepts the burden of a sort of guide preparing humanity for interplanetary colonization. It is as if the exigency of the incoming Astropocene has overthrown some of the restrictions normally associated with ecocritical writing.

In the third chapter, “A Body in the Universal Ecosystem,” we find ourselves in space at last, moving from the history of the International Space Station through readings of what Gormley calls “science fact fiction”—sci-fi texts that prove instructive, via ecocriticism, for humanity’s expansion into space (76). Here the brightest exemplar is Ridley Scott’s film The Martian, which Gormley reads as a “nature narrative” reflecting our future and present (77). He uses this film to imagine what life might be like for the explorers who first colonize and begin to terraform Mars. Terraforming becomes the focus of chapter 4, “The Astropocene,” as it represents the absolute closure of the Anthropocene. Gormley figures terraforming as a flashpoint that “human technology funnels toward” (106), the zenith of environmental efforts, a singularity. He balances his interest in and passion for terraforming with a repeated call for a coherent ecoethic...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类世的终结:迈克尔-J-戈姆利(Michael J. Gormley)的《生态批评、宇宙生态系统和天体世》(评论
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 人类世的终结:迈克尔-J.-戈姆利(Michael J. Gormley)著,《人类世的终结:生态批评、普遍生态系统和天体世》(The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene by Michael J. Gormley Ian Hill (bio) Michael J. Gormley 著:生态批评、全球生态系统和天体新世》(Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene)。Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2021, 206 pp.人类世的终结》(The End of the Anthropocene:中,迈克尔-J-戈姆利摆脱了严格意义上的地球生态批评的局限性,展望了一个星际殖民时代,他称之为 "天体纪"。通过一系列细读,戈姆雷从理论上探讨了人类可能以及应该如何与新环境--月球、火星、太空真空--进行互动,并以新颖的方式运用生态批评来审视宇宙扩张的伦理影响。人类世的终结》将生态批评从地球的束缚中解放出来,展示了其普遍价值和适用性,令人钦佩。在这样做的过程中,戈姆雷在生态论述中开辟了新的空间,尽管他的努力因对不远的未来过于乐观的看法、对殖民化的历史和影响强调不够以及有限的档案而略显不足。戈姆雷在书中沿着人类已经走过和(他预言)将要走过的道路,从荒野开始,然后到我们目前所处的气候启示录,到近太空殖民,再到外太空殖民,同时凝聚着理论和推测的动力。第一章 "生态批评与世界生态系统 "涉及的是生态批评家和非专业读者都很容易掌握的、接地气的、熟悉的主题。本书从狼开始--一个人们最熟悉的形象--一直回到狼,就像回到肮脏的、亲身实践的追踪一样。尽管《天体纪的终结》以其书名和月球封面承诺了一种科学甚至是科幻的阅读体验(并在很大程度上兑现了这些承诺),但它很少忽略我们身边的世界。戈姆雷竭力避免疏远读者。毕竟,既然 "本书的真正目的是让人类为快速融入行星外生态系统做好准备",那么他希望欢迎尽可能多的读者也就在情理之中了(14)。他甚至将这种广泛的人类包容性融入了 "Astropocene "一词 [第 323 页完],而不是词源上更贴切的 "Astrocene",以保留与人类的联系。第二章 "生物世界 "涉及动物(人类和其他动物)以及它们如何与其他生物和环境互动,所有这些都属于 "生物特性 "的范畴。戈姆利在科马克-麦卡锡的《穿越》和《血色子午线》中找到了我们可以学习的经验和方向,以 "生态伦理 "和 "作为自然说话 "的方式生存--他认为,如果我们要超越人类世,这两个目标至关重要。在这里,我们看到戈姆雷以自我意识和机智挑战了生态批评的传统界限。他抵制生态批评先驱劳伦斯-布尔(Lawrence Buell)的禁令,反对试图代表自然说话,反对 "人类统治主义"(19),指出 "生态批评需要一种新的技术来评估即将到来的环境中的人类生物体"(72),并接受了为人类准备星际殖民的某种指南的重任。仿佛即将到来的 "天体纪 "的紧迫性推翻了通常与生态批评写作相关的一些限制。在第三章 "宇宙生态系统中的躯体 "中,我们发现自己终于进入了太空,从国际空间站的历史出发,阅读了戈姆雷所说的 "科学事实小说"--这些科幻文本通过生态批评证明了对人类向太空扩张的指导意义(76)。雷德利-斯科特(Ridley Scott)的电影《火星救援》(The Martian)就是最典型的例子,戈姆利将其解读为反映我们未来和现在的 "自然叙事"(77)。他用这部电影来想象首次殖民火星并开始对火星进行地球化改造的探险家们的生活会是什么样子。地球化成为第四章 "天体世 "的重点,因为它代表了人类世的绝对终结。戈姆雷将地球化描绘成 "人类技术驶向"(106)的一个爆发点,一个环保努力的顶点,一个奇点。他在对地形改造的兴趣和热情之间取得了平衡,并一再呼吁建立一个连贯的生态伦理...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Configurations
Configurations Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Configurations explores the relations of literature and the arts to the sciences and technology. Founded in 1993, the journal continues to set the stage for transdisciplinary research concerning the interplay between science, technology, and the arts. Configurations is the official publication of the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts (SLSA).
期刊最新文献
Reading Storied Corals with the Scientific Poetics of Water The Global Distribution, Life History, and Taxonomic Description of the Common Oceanic Plastic Bag: Plasticus sacculi sp. nov The Immersive Enclosure: Virtual Reality in Japan by Paul Roquet (review) Contributors The End of the Anthropocene: Ecocriticism, the Universal Ecosystem, and the Astropocene by Michael J. Gormley (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1