If Engrams Are the Answer, What Is the Question?

Abstract

Engram labelling and manipulation methodologies are now a staple of contemporary neuroscientific practice, giving the impression that the physical basis of engrams has been discovered. Despite enormous progress, engrams have not been clearly identified, and it is unclear what they should look like. There is an epistemic bias in engram neuroscience toward characterizing biological changes while neglecting the development of theory. However, the tools of engram biology are exciting precisely because they are not just an incremental step forward in understanding the mechanisms of plasticity and learning but because they can be leveraged to inform theory on one of the fundamental mysteries in neuroscience-how and in what format the brain stores information. We do not propose such a theory here, as we first require an appreciation for what is lacking. We outline a selection of issues in four sections from theoretical biology and philosophy that engram biology and systems neuroscience generally should engage with in order to construct useful future theoretical frameworks. Specifically, what is it that engrams are supposed to explain? How do the different building blocks of the brain-wide engram come together? What exactly are these component parts? And what information do they carry, if they carry anything at all? Asking these questions is not purely the privilege of philosophy but a key to informing scientific hypotheses that make the most of the experimental tools at our disposal. The risk for not engaging with these issues is high. Without a theory of what engrams are, what they do, and the wider computational processes they fit into, we may never know when they have been found.