Factors affecting shared decision-making concerning menopausal hormone therapy

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/nyas.15185
Kanyada Koysombat, Annice Mukherjee, Sandhi Nyunt, Hugo Pedder, Yana Vinogradova, Jo Burgin, Harshida Dave, Alexander N. Comninos, Vikram Talaulikar, Julia V. Bailey, Waljit S. Dhillo, Ali Abbara
{"title":"Factors affecting shared decision-making concerning menopausal hormone therapy","authors":"Kanyada Koysombat,&nbsp;Annice Mukherjee,&nbsp;Sandhi Nyunt,&nbsp;Hugo Pedder,&nbsp;Yana Vinogradova,&nbsp;Jo Burgin,&nbsp;Harshida Dave,&nbsp;Alexander N. Comninos,&nbsp;Vikram Talaulikar,&nbsp;Julia V. Bailey,&nbsp;Waljit S. Dhillo,&nbsp;Ali Abbara","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is an effective treatment for menopause-related symptoms. Menopause management guidelines recommend a personalized approach to menopause care, including MHT use. Decision-making around menopause care is a complex, iterative process influenced by multiple factors framed by perspectives from both women and healthcare providers (HCPs). This narrative review aims to summarize evidence around factors affecting decision-making regarding menopause-related care. For HCPs, the provision of individualized risk estimates is challenging in practice given the number of potential benefits and risks to consider, and the complexity of the data available, especially within time-limited consultations. Women seeking menopause care have the difficult task of making sense of the benefit versus risk profiles to make choices in line with their decisional needs influenced by sociocultural/economic, educational, demographic, and personal characteristics. The press, social media, and influential celebrities also impact the perception of menopause and decision-making around it. Understanding these factors can lead to improved participation in shared decision-making, satisfaction with the decision and decision-making process, adherence to treatment, reduced decisional regret, efficient use of resources, and ultimately long-term satisfaction with care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.15185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is an effective treatment for menopause-related symptoms. Menopause management guidelines recommend a personalized approach to menopause care, including MHT use. Decision-making around menopause care is a complex, iterative process influenced by multiple factors framed by perspectives from both women and healthcare providers (HCPs). This narrative review aims to summarize evidence around factors affecting decision-making regarding menopause-related care. For HCPs, the provision of individualized risk estimates is challenging in practice given the number of potential benefits and risks to consider, and the complexity of the data available, especially within time-limited consultations. Women seeking menopause care have the difficult task of making sense of the benefit versus risk profiles to make choices in line with their decisional needs influenced by sociocultural/economic, educational, demographic, and personal characteristics. The press, social media, and influential celebrities also impact the perception of menopause and decision-making around it. Understanding these factors can lead to improved participation in shared decision-making, satisfaction with the decision and decision-making process, adherence to treatment, reduced decisional regret, efficient use of resources, and ultimately long-term satisfaction with care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响更年期激素治疗共同决策的因素。
更年期激素疗法(MHT)是治疗更年期相关症状的有效方法。更年期管理指南建议采用个性化的更年期护理方法,包括使用更年期激素疗法。更年期护理决策是一个复杂、反复的过程,受妇女和医疗保健提供者(HCPs)观点等多种因素的影响。本叙述性综述旨在总结影响更年期相关护理决策因素的相关证据。对于医疗保健提供者而言,鉴于需要考虑的潜在益处和风险的数量以及可用数据的复杂性,尤其是在有时间限制的咨询中,提供个体化的风险估计在实践中具有挑战性。寻求更年期治疗的女性面临着一项艰巨的任务,即如何理解收益与风险之间的关系,以便根据受社会文化/经济、教育、人口和个人特征影响的决策需求做出选择。新闻媒体、社交媒体和有影响力的名人也会影响人们对更年期的看法和相关决策。了解这些因素可以提高共同决策的参与度、对决策和决策过程的满意度、坚持治疗、减少决策遗憾、有效利用资源,并最终提高对护理的长期满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular disease and testosterone therapy in male hypogonadism. Process evaluation of the initial implementation of the Moments that Matter parenting program in Kenya Current landscape of fertility induction in males with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Issue Information Anatomical compensation of retinal nerve fiber layer improves the detection of glaucoma between ethnicities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1