Anatomical compensation of retinal nerve fiber layer improves the detection of glaucoma between ethnicities

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1111/nyas.15208
Jacqueline Chua, Chi Li, Damon W. K. Wong, Rachel S. Chong, Rahat Husain, Tina T. Wong, Clemens Vass, Ching-Yu Cheng, Tin Aung, Leopold Schmetterer
{"title":"Anatomical compensation of retinal nerve fiber layer improves the detection of glaucoma between ethnicities","authors":"Jacqueline Chua,&nbsp;Chi Li,&nbsp;Damon W. K. Wong,&nbsp;Rachel S. Chong,&nbsp;Rahat Husain,&nbsp;Tina T. Wong,&nbsp;Clemens Vass,&nbsp;Ching-Yu Cheng,&nbsp;Tin Aung,&nbsp;Leopold Schmetterer","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aimed to evaluate the impact of compensating retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness for demographic and anatomical factors on glaucoma detection in Chinese and Indian adults. A population-based study included 1995 healthy participants (1076 Chinese and 919 Indians) to construct a multivariable linear regression compensation model. This model was applied to 357 Chinese glaucoma patients, 357 healthy Chinese, and 357 healthy Indians using Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). The compensated RNFL thickness considered age, refractive error, optic disc parameters, and retinal vessel density. Results showed that although the average RNFL thickness was significantly higher in Chinese participants compared to Indians, the compensation model reduced this difference to nonsignificance. Moreover, the compensation model significantly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.90 vs. 0.78; <i>p</i>&lt;0.001), sensitivity (75% vs. 51%), and specificity (67% vs. 32%) in distinguishing Chinese glaucoma patients from healthy Indian individuals. The compensation model significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of RNFL thickness in distinguishing glaucoma in the Chinese ethnic group compared to the OCT instrument's default values. These results suggest that modifying RNFL measurements based on individual characteristics can yield substantial benefits for glaucoma detection across ethnicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1540 1","pages":"338-349"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.15208","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of compensating retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness for demographic and anatomical factors on glaucoma detection in Chinese and Indian adults. A population-based study included 1995 healthy participants (1076 Chinese and 919 Indians) to construct a multivariable linear regression compensation model. This model was applied to 357 Chinese glaucoma patients, 357 healthy Chinese, and 357 healthy Indians using Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). The compensated RNFL thickness considered age, refractive error, optic disc parameters, and retinal vessel density. Results showed that although the average RNFL thickness was significantly higher in Chinese participants compared to Indians, the compensation model reduced this difference to nonsignificance. Moreover, the compensation model significantly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.90 vs. 0.78; p<0.001), sensitivity (75% vs. 51%), and specificity (67% vs. 32%) in distinguishing Chinese glaucoma patients from healthy Indian individuals. The compensation model significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of RNFL thickness in distinguishing glaucoma in the Chinese ethnic group compared to the OCT instrument's default values. These results suggest that modifying RNFL measurements based on individual characteristics can yield substantial benefits for glaucoma detection across ethnicities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜神经纤维层的解剖补偿改善了不同种族间青光眼的检测。
该研究旨在评估人口统计学和解剖学因素对视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度的补偿对中国和印度成年人青光眼检测的影响。一项基于人群的研究纳入了 1995 名健康参与者(1076 名中国人和 919 名印度人),以构建一个多变量线性回归补偿模型。使用 Cirrus 光谱域光学相干断层扫描 (OCT) 将该模型应用于 357 名中国青光眼患者、357 名健康中国人和 357 名健康印度人。补偿后的 RNFL 厚度考虑了年龄、屈光不正、视盘参数和视网膜血管密度。结果显示,虽然中国人的平均 RNFL 厚度明显高于印度人,但补偿模型将这一差异降低到了非显著性水平。此外,补偿模型明显改善了接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(0.90 vs. 0.78; p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
期刊最新文献
Researching gender and loneliness differently The helmeted hornbill casque is reinforced by a bundle of exceptionally thick, rod‐like trabeculae Audio-visual concert performances synchronize audience's heart rates Geometric series exists in nature: Evidence from sorted area sequences of floral parts and leaves The rhythm of horse gaits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1