[Personal and Environmental Contextual Factors in Socio-Medical Orthopedic Evaluation Reports].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1055/a-2308-7319
Judith Gartmann, Christoph Egen, Christian Sturm, Andrea Bökel
{"title":"[Personal and Environmental Contextual Factors in Socio-Medical Orthopedic Evaluation Reports].","authors":"Judith Gartmann, Christoph Egen, Christian Sturm, Andrea Bökel","doi":"10.1055/a-2308-7319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The personal and environmental contextual factors of the ICF describe not only physical and mental health but also (occupational) participation. So far, the extent to which these contextual factors are taken into account in the socio-medical evaluation has not been clarified. Contextual factors can guide allocation to disability pension or rehabilitative interventions in an individualized and targeted manner. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of ICF contextual factors in socio-medical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A frequency analysis of contextual factors in socio-medical reports for musculoskeletal disorders was performed. Contextual factors mentioned several times were coded once in the report. In the frequency ranking, each environmental and personal factor was categorized as \"frequent,\" \"moderate,\" and \"rare.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>215 socio-medical reports with musculoskeletal diagnoses starting from 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All socio medical reports were analyzed for the occurence of personal contextual and environmental factors. In particular, personal factors were identified, which provide information about general personal characteristics or the general state of health. Almost half of the environmental factors were rarely identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many ICF contextual factors are constantly recorded in the analyzed reports. The important influence of these factors on return to work is well known. Thus, the absence or low presence of the ICF contextual factors from the chapters Attitudes (i4), Basic Skills (i4) and Support & Relationships (e3), which are also contextual to the assessed person's experience of the world of work, was surprising. The relevance of the frequently and rarely identified contextual factors for the socio-medical evaluation of musculoskeletal disability pension applicants must be questioned.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2308-7319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The personal and environmental contextual factors of the ICF describe not only physical and mental health but also (occupational) participation. So far, the extent to which these contextual factors are taken into account in the socio-medical evaluation has not been clarified. Contextual factors can guide allocation to disability pension or rehabilitative interventions in an individualized and targeted manner. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of ICF contextual factors in socio-medical evaluation.

Methodology: A frequency analysis of contextual factors in socio-medical reports for musculoskeletal disorders was performed. Contextual factors mentioned several times were coded once in the report. In the frequency ranking, each environmental and personal factor was categorized as "frequent," "moderate," and "rare."

Results: 215 socio-medical reports with musculoskeletal diagnoses starting from 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All socio medical reports were analyzed for the occurence of personal contextual and environmental factors. In particular, personal factors were identified, which provide information about general personal characteristics or the general state of health. Almost half of the environmental factors were rarely identified.

Conclusion: Many ICF contextual factors are constantly recorded in the analyzed reports. The important influence of these factors on return to work is well known. Thus, the absence or low presence of the ICF contextual factors from the chapters Attitudes (i4), Basic Skills (i4) and Support & Relationships (e3), which are also contextual to the assessed person's experience of the world of work, was surprising. The relevance of the frequently and rarely identified contextual factors for the socio-medical evaluation of musculoskeletal disability pension applicants must be questioned.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[社会医学矫形评估报告中的个人和环境背景因素]。
导言:国际功能、残疾和健康分类》中的个人和环境因素不仅描述了身心健康,还描述了 (职业)参与情况。迄今为止,这些背景因素在社会医疗评估中的考虑程度尚未明确。环境因素可以指导以个性化和有针对性的方式分配残疾抚恤金或进行康复干预。本研究旨在确定《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》背景因素在社会医疗评估中的频率:方法:对肌肉骨骼疾病社会医疗报告中的背景因素进行频率分析。在报告中多次提及的背景因素被编码为一次。在频率排序中,每个环境因素和个人因素被分为 "频繁"、"中等 "和 "罕见"。"结果:对自2017年起的215份诊断为肌肉骨骼疾病的社会医疗报告进行了回顾性分析。分析了所有社会医疗报告中出现的个人背景因素和环境因素。特别是个人因素,它提供了有关一般个人特征或一般健康状况的信息。近一半的环境因素很少被发现:结论:在分析的报告中不断记录了许多《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的背景因素。这些因素对重返工作岗位的重要影响是众所周知的。因此,《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》中的态度(i4)、基本技能(i4)和支持与关系(e3)等章节中没有或很少出现环境因素令人惊讶,因为这些因素也与被评估者的工作经历有关。必须质疑的是,这些经常被发现和很少被发现的背景因素与肌肉骨骼残疾抚恤金申请人的社会医疗评估是否相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Professional Health Literacy of General Practitioners - Results of the HLS-PROF]. [Rehabilitation Recommendations According to § 31 SGB XI: Empiricism, Discussion and Health Policy Implications]. [The Effect of Service Concentration on Outcome Quality in Obstetrics Departments - An Empirical Analysis of Newborn Mortality in German Hospitals]. [Development Of Long-Term Care Dependency And Utilisation Of Long-Term Care Services From 2017 To 2022 In Germany, Saxony-Anhalt: Analysis Of Health Insurance Data]. [Subjective Health Impairment And Associated Factors In The Heatwave Of Summer 2022: An Online Survey].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1