{"title":"Addressing cultural context is the missing piece in policy solutions to plastic pollution","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The dialogue on solutions to plastic pollution to date has largely focussed on targeting commonly found items or areas where large volumes of litter accumulate in the environment. The need to identify better solutions to reduce plastic pollution at the global scale has been highlighted in recent G7 and G20 discussions. Negotiations are underway for a global, legally-binding Plastics Treaty that countries will hopefully agree on, however, the local implementation of the global agreement will be challenging and complex. Cultural norms and values are likely to influence the adoption of new waste disposal practices and rules, and also impact industry and consumer behaviour and compliance more generally. To date, cultural norms and values have not entered the global solution dialogue. If a global treaty to reduce plastic pollution is to succeed, understanding the potential impact of these cultural dimensions on the potential effectiveness of implementing the agreement is crucial. Building upon the cross-culture research, this paper describes the potential impact of failing to consider cultural aspects in the decision-making process and implementation of the Global Plastics Treaty. As Treaty negotiations are underway, actively considering and addressing the influence of culture will contribute to more inclusive Treaty obligations. This in turn could influence new national plans of action, reporting, compliance and monitoring of plastic pollution by signatory member states.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001631/pdfft?md5=cf8347e7238fbc06145507540fc9034d&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124001631-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001631","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The dialogue on solutions to plastic pollution to date has largely focussed on targeting commonly found items or areas where large volumes of litter accumulate in the environment. The need to identify better solutions to reduce plastic pollution at the global scale has been highlighted in recent G7 and G20 discussions. Negotiations are underway for a global, legally-binding Plastics Treaty that countries will hopefully agree on, however, the local implementation of the global agreement will be challenging and complex. Cultural norms and values are likely to influence the adoption of new waste disposal practices and rules, and also impact industry and consumer behaviour and compliance more generally. To date, cultural norms and values have not entered the global solution dialogue. If a global treaty to reduce plastic pollution is to succeed, understanding the potential impact of these cultural dimensions on the potential effectiveness of implementing the agreement is crucial. Building upon the cross-culture research, this paper describes the potential impact of failing to consider cultural aspects in the decision-making process and implementation of the Global Plastics Treaty. As Treaty negotiations are underway, actively considering and addressing the influence of culture will contribute to more inclusive Treaty obligations. This in turn could influence new national plans of action, reporting, compliance and monitoring of plastic pollution by signatory member states.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.