Digital transformation decoupling: The impact of willful ignorance on public sector digital transformation

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101958
Jonathan Crusoe , Johan Magnusson , Johan Eklund
{"title":"Digital transformation decoupling: The impact of willful ignorance on public sector digital transformation","authors":"Jonathan Crusoe ,&nbsp;Johan Magnusson ,&nbsp;Johan Eklund","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2024.101958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The public sector is actively pursuing digital transformation to ensure continuous operations and relevance. While existing research has outlined essential prerequisites for successful digital transformation, there is recognition of willful ignorance concerning these prerequisites. Public servants may in other words deliberately avoid understanding the necessary conditions for digital transformation, often driven by strategic motives such as evading responsibility and/or accountability. The phenomenon of willful ignorance constitutes an important yet under-researched area within the study of digital government. To close this gap, we investigate the latent factors of willful ignorance in public sector digital transformation, utilizing three sets of national panel data focused on digital transformation prerequisites. Employing exploratory factor analysis on an initial sample, we construct a factor model, subsequently assessing its validity through confirmatory factor analysis on two additional samples. Our research identifies and validates latent factors associated with willful ignorance in the digital transformation of the public sector. Building on these findings, we propose a mid-range variance theory termed “digital transformation decoupling”. By integrating this theory with existing knowledge, we present a set of propositions to guide future research in the realm of public sector digital transformation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"41 3","pages":"Article 101958"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000509/pdfft?md5=6c85db118e6e31164541ba166aea10b0&pid=1-s2.0-S0740624X24000509-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000509","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The public sector is actively pursuing digital transformation to ensure continuous operations and relevance. While existing research has outlined essential prerequisites for successful digital transformation, there is recognition of willful ignorance concerning these prerequisites. Public servants may in other words deliberately avoid understanding the necessary conditions for digital transformation, often driven by strategic motives such as evading responsibility and/or accountability. The phenomenon of willful ignorance constitutes an important yet under-researched area within the study of digital government. To close this gap, we investigate the latent factors of willful ignorance in public sector digital transformation, utilizing three sets of national panel data focused on digital transformation prerequisites. Employing exploratory factor analysis on an initial sample, we construct a factor model, subsequently assessing its validity through confirmatory factor analysis on two additional samples. Our research identifies and validates latent factors associated with willful ignorance in the digital transformation of the public sector. Building on these findings, we propose a mid-range variance theory termed “digital transformation decoupling”. By integrating this theory with existing knowledge, we present a set of propositions to guide future research in the realm of public sector digital transformation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化转型脱钩:故意忽视对公共部门数字化转型的影响
公共部门正在积极推进数字化转型,以确保持续运营和相关性。虽然现有研究概述了成功实现数字化转型的基本前提,但人们也认识到对这些先决条件的故意忽视。换句话说,公务员可能故意回避了解数字化转型的必要条件,这往往是出于战略动机,如逃避责任和/或问责。故意无知现象是数字政府研究中一个重要但研究不足的领域。为了填补这一空白,我们利用三组以数字化转型先决条件为重点的国家面板数据,研究了公共部门数字化转型中故意无知的潜在因素。通过对初始样本进行探索性因子分析,我们构建了一个因子模型,随后通过对另外两个样本进行确认性因子分析来评估其有效性。我们的研究发现并验证了与公共部门数字化转型中故意忽视相关的潜在因素。在这些研究结果的基础上,我们提出了一个称为 "数字化转型脱钩 "的中程变异理论。通过将这一理论与现有知识相结合,我们提出了一系列命题,以指导公共部门数字化转型领域的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
A more secure framework for open government data sharing based on federated learning Does trust in government moderate the perception towards deepfakes? Comparative perspectives from Asia on the risks of AI and misinformation for democracy Open government data and self-efficacy: The empirical evidence of micro foundation via survey experiments Transforming towards inclusion-by-design: Information system design principles shaping data-driven financial inclusiveness Bridging the gap: Towards an expanded toolkit for AI-driven decision-making in the public sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1